Choice of living arrangements.

BACKGROUND The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA. METHOD Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non-family-home service settings in 26 US states. RESULTS Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co-occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency-operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived. CONCLUSIONS In 2008, despite community-living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements.

[1]  R. Stancliffe,et al.  Satisfaction and sense of well being among Medicaid ICF/MR and HCBS recipients in six states. , 2009, Intellectual and developmental disabilities.

[2]  Roy I. Brown,et al.  Choice as an Aspect of Quality of Life for People With Intellectual Disabilities , 2009 .

[3]  Steve Taylor,et al.  Implementation of Consumer-Directed Services for Persons With Intellectual or Developmental Disabilities : A National Study , 2009 .

[4]  S. Larson,et al.  Changes in the number of people with intellectual or developmental disabilities living in homes they own or rent between 1998 and 2007. , 2008, Intellectual and developmental disabilities.

[5]  J. Wiltz,et al.  Aggression, Sociability, and Roommate Friendship: New Findings Translated Into a Resource for Self‐Determined Choices , 2008 .

[6]  A. Petch,et al.  Outcomes Important to People With Intellectual Disabilities , 2008 .

[7]  R. Stancliffe,et al.  Choice-making among Medicaid HCBS and ICF/MR recipients in six states. , 2008, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[8]  H. Kleinert,et al.  Quality of life dimensions for adults with developmental disabilities: a comparative study. , 2005, Mental retardation.

[9]  D. Carran,et al.  Attainment of personal outcomes by people with developmental disabilities. , 2005, Mental retardation.

[10]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  Theory in Self-Determination: Foundations for Educational Practice , 2003 .

[11]  K. Järbrink,et al.  Quality and costs of supported living residences and group homes in the United Kingdom. , 2001, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[12]  R. Stancliffe Proxy respondents and quality of life , 2000 .

[13]  R. Stancliffe,et al.  Outcomes and costs of community living: A matched comparison of group homes and semi-independent living , 2000 .

[14]  R. Stancliffe,et al.  Personal control and the ecology of community living settings: beyond living-unit size and type. , 2000, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[15]  T. Heller,et al.  Autonomy in residential facilities and community functioning of adults with mental retardation. , 1999, Mental retardation.

[16]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  Self-determination across living and working environments: a matched-samples study of adults with mental retardation. , 1999, Mental retardation.

[17]  J. S. Newton,et al.  Comparison of supported living and traditional residential services in the state of Oregon. , 1998, Mental retardation.

[18]  R. Stancliffe,et al.  Longitudinal study of deinstitutionalization and the exercise of choice. , 1997, Mental retardation.

[19]  R. Stancliffe Community living-unit size, staff presence, and residents' choice-making. , 1997, Mental retardation.

[20]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The National Consumer Survey. , 1995, Mental retardation.

[21]  R. Stancliffe Assessing opportunities for choice-making: a comparison of self- and staff reports. , 1995, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[22]  R. Foxx,et al.  "Would I be able to ... "? Teaching clients to assess the availability of their community living life style preferences. , 1993, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[23]  L. Gordon,et al.  An examination of lifestyle and adjustment in three community residential alternatives. , 1991, Research in developmental disabilities.

[24]  Ray Db,et al.  The president's committee on mental retardation. , 1968 .