A reduced model for the ITER divertor based on SOLPS solutions for ITER Q = 10 baseline conditions: A. identifying options for the control parameters

Edge codes such as SOLPS coupled to neutral codes such as EIRENE have become so comprehensive and sophisticated that they now constitute, in effect, ‘code-experiments’ that, as for actual experiments, can benefit from interpretation using simple models and conceptual frameworks, i.e. reduced models. The first task is the identification of options for the reduced model control parameters that are best suited for control of the action of the divertor, i.e. for control of target power loading and sputter-erosion, primarily. A strong correlation between the electron temperature at the divertor target, T e,t, and the neutral deuterium D2 density at the target, n D2,t, flux-tube resolved, has recently been reported for a number of code studies including SOLPS-4.3 modeling of a set of ∼50 ITER baseline cases: Q DT = 10, q 95 = 3, P SOL = 100 MW, metallic walls, and Ne seeding (Pitts et al 2019 Nucl. Mater. Energy 20 100696). This part A of the present study reports new results for largely the same ITER cases, confirming the strong correlations reported earlier between local values of T e,t, and (i) n D2,t, and (ii) normalized volumetric losses of power and pressure in the divertor. Strong correlations have now also been found, and are reported here for the first time, between T e,t and all of the divertor target quantities of practical interest. A physical explanation for this surprising result has not been fully identified; nevertheless it has encouraging implications for reduced modeling of the ITER divertor. For such ITER conditions, (i) the global Ne injection rate, InjNe (Ne s−1), and (ii) the electron temperature at the location on the target where the peak power deposition occurs, T e,t @q ⊥,pk (eV), are found to be promising reduced model control parameters. In the companion report, part B, a reduced model for the ITER divertor is developed and described in detail, based on reversed-direction 2 point modelling, Rev2PM. The input to the reduced model is a value of the variable pair Te,t@q⊥,pk,InjNe and the output are values of the various target as well as divertor-entrance quantities of practical interest, e.g. q ⊥,pk, n e,Xpt (the electron density at the poloidal location of the X-point), etc. In part B the reduced model is quantitatively characterized using one half of the code cases; it is then used to successfully predict (replicate) the code values of e.g. n e,Xpt for the other half of the cases.

[1]  X. Bonnin,et al.  High gas throughput SOLPS-ITER simulations extending the ITER database to strong detachment , 2022, Nuclear Fusion.

[2]  X. Bonnin,et al.  Comparison between SOLPS-4.3 and the Lengyel Model for ITER baseline neon-seeded plasmas , 2021 .

[3]  P. Stangeby,et al.  A simple analytic model of impurity leakage from the divertor and accumulation in the main scrape-off layer , 2020, Nuclear Fusion.

[4]  V. Rozhansky,et al.  Physics basis for the first ITER tungsten divertor , 2019, Nuclear Materials and Energy.

[5]  A. Leonard,et al.  Dependence of neutral pressure on detachment in the small angle slot divertor at DIII-D , 2019, Nuclear Materials and Energy.

[6]  R. Dux,et al.  Neutral pressure and separatrix density related models for seed impurity divertor radiation in ASDEX Upgrade , 2019, Nuclear Materials and Energy.

[7]  P. Stangeby Basic physical processes and reduced models for plasma detachment , 2018 .

[8]  H. Eixenberger,et al.  Status of the development of diagnostic pressure gauges for the operation in ITER , 2017 .

[9]  P. Stangeby,et al.  Strong correlation between D2 density and electron temperature at the target of divertors found in SOLPS analysis , 2017 .

[10]  H. Ogawa,et al.  Failure mode analysis of preliminary design of ITER divertor impurity monitor , 2016 .

[11]  A. Kukushkin,et al.  Impurity seeding in ITER DT plasmas in a carbon-free environment , 2015 .

[12]  D. Reiter,et al.  Two-point analysis of the numerical modelling of detached divertor plasmas , 2009 .

[13]  A. Scarabosio,et al.  Measurements of neutral gas fluxes under different plasma and divertor regimes in ASDEX Upgrade , 2009 .

[14]  D. Reiter,et al.  On the measurement of molecular particle fluxes in fusion boundary plasmas , 2003 .

[15]  P. Stangeby,et al.  The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices , 2000 .

[16]  H. Bosch,et al.  In vessel pressure measurement in nuclear fusion experiments with ASDEX gauges , 1998 .