Variational quantum simulation of long-range interacting systems

Current quantum simulators suffer from multiple limitations such as short coherence time, noisy operations, faulty readout and restricted qubit connectivity in some platforms. Variational quantum algorithms are the most promising approach in near-term quantum simulation to achieve practical quantum advantage over classical computers. Here, we explore variational quantum algorithms, with different levels of qubit connectivity, for digital simulation of the ground state of long-range interacting systems as well as generation of spin squeezed states. We find that as the interaction becomes more long-ranged, the variational algorithms become less efficient, achieving lower fidelity and demanding more optimization iterations. In particular, when the system is near its criticality the efficiency is even lower. Increasing the connectivity between distant qubits improves the results, even with less quantum and classical resources. Our results show that by mixing circuit layers with different levels of connectivity one can sensibly improve the performance. Interestingly, the order of layers becomes very important and grouping the layers with long-distance connectivity at the beginning of the circuit outperforms other permutations. The same design of circuits can also be used to variationally produce spin squeezed states, as a resource for quantum metrology.

[1]  Ken M. Nakanishi,et al.  Subspace variational quantum simulator , 2019, Physical Review Research.

[2]  K. Mitarai,et al.  Classically optimized variational quantum eigensolver with applications to topological phases , 2022, Physical Review Research.

[3]  Jun Li,et al.  Towards a Larger Molecular Simulation on the Quantum Computer: Up to 28 Qubits Systems Accelerated by Point Group Symmetry , 2021, 2109.02110.

[4]  C. Png,et al.  Exploring variational quantum eigensolver ansatzes for the long-range XY model , 2021, 2109.00288.

[5]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  Long-time simulations with high fidelity on quantum hardware , 2021, ArXiv.

[6]  Frederic T. Chong,et al.  Adaptive Circuit Learning for Quantum Metrology , 2020, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE).

[7]  Randall D. Kamien,et al.  Reviews of Modern Physics at 90 , 2019, Physics Today.

[8]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[9]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[10]  Hartmut Neven,et al.  Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors , 2018, 1802.06002.

[11]  Ronald de Wolf,et al.  A Survey of Quantum Learning Theory , 2017, ArXiv.

[12]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[13]  E. Farhi,et al.  A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm , 2014, 1411.4028.

[14]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[15]  M. Lavagna Quantum phase transitions , 2001, cond-mat/0102119.

[16]  W. Ritz Über eine neue Methode zur Lösung gewisser Variationsprobleme der mathematischen Physik. , 1909 .

[17]  L. W.,et al.  The Theory of Sound , 1898, Nature.