New Ways of Setting Rewards: The beyond Budgeting Model

The vast majority of companies today use fixed performance contracts to drive performance improvement. The core elements of this contract are fixed annual targets reinforced by financial incentives. It is the intense pressure placed on meeting these contracts that leads to "gaming the numbers" as managers at every level of the firm fight tooth and nail to meet their targets and earn their bonuses. Not only is this process often stressful but it can also lead to actions that destroy value for the firm. There are, however, a number of companies that have broken free from the reliance on contracts and incentives. They have typically changed their evaluation and rewards processes from fixed to relative measures. This article explores the problems of fixed contracts and how alternative rewards programs can be used to avoid gaming and provide managers with more honest numbers.

[1]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Matrix management: not a structure, a frame of mind. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[2]  P. Drucker They're not employees, they're people. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[3]  C. Argyris Empowerment: the emperor's new clothes. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[4]  M. Rogers,et al.  Control in an Age of Empowerment , 1995 .

[5]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  CEO Incentives - It's Not How Much You Pay, But How , 1990, Harvard business review.

[6]  A. Kohn Why incentive plans cannot work , 1993 .

[7]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Six dangerous myths about pay. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[8]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Corporate Budgeting is Broken, Let's Fix it , 2001 .

[9]  G T Watts,et al.  Risks and rewards. , 1977, British medical journal.

[10]  Alfie kohn Challenging Behaviorist Dogma: Myths About Money and Motivation , 1998 .

[11]  A. Rappaport,et al.  New thinking on how to link executive pay with performance. , 1999, Harvard business review.