Cue Combinatorics in Memory Retrieval for Anaphora

Many studies have shown that memory retrieval for real-time language processing relies on a cue-based access mechanism, which allows the cues available at the retrieval site to directly access the target representation in memory. An open question is how different types of cues are combined at retrieval to create a single retrieval probe ("cue combinatorics"). This study addresses this question by testing whether retrieval for antecedent-reflexive dependencies combines cues in a linear (i.e., additive) or nonlinear (i.e., multiplicative) fashion. Results from computational simulations and a reading time experiment show that target items that match all the cues of the reflexive are favored more than target items that mismatch these cues, and that different degrees of mismatches slow reading times in comparable amounts. This profile is consistent with the predictions of a nonlinear cue combination and provides evidence against models in which all cues combine in a linear fashion. A follow-up set of simulations shows that a nonlinear rule also captures previous demonstrations of interference from nontarget items during retrieval for reflexive licensing. Taken together, these results shed new light on how different types of cues combine at the retrieval site and reveal how the method of cue combination impacts the accessibility of linguistic information in memory.

[1]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Natural Languages , 1968 .

[2]  B. McElree,et al.  Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[3]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A Theory of Sentence Memory as Part of A General Theory of Memory , 2001 .

[4]  C. Phillips,et al.  Reflexive attraction in comprehension is selective , 2017 .

[5]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[6]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Ali Idrissi,et al.  Representing number in the real-time processing of agreement: self-paced reading evidence from Arabic , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[8]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[9]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Finitary models of language users , 1963 .

[10]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis , 2017 .

[11]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[12]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension , 2015 .

[13]  W. Badecker,et al.  The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  John Hale,et al.  Parallel processing and sentence comprehension difficulty , 2011 .

[15]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules , 1963 .

[16]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[17]  Zhong Chen,et al.  How structure-sensitive is the parser? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2012 .

[18]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension , 1999 .

[20]  M. Wagers The structure of memory meets memory for structure in linguistic cognition , 2008 .

[21]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[22]  C. Clifton,et al.  Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension , 2008 .

[23]  J. S. Nairne A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[24]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[25]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Statistical Methods for Linguistic Research: Foundational Ideas - Part I , 2016, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[26]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Local anaphor licensing in an SOV language: implications for retrieval strategies , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[27]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[28]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[29]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Models of retrieval in sentence comprehension: A computational evaluation using Bayesian hierarchical modeling , 2018, ArXiv.

[30]  John R. Anderson The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[31]  Ekaterina P. Volkova,et al.  Emotion categorization of body expressions in narrative scenarios , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[32]  Andrea E. Martin,et al.  Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension , 2011, NeuroImage.

[33]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Processing Reflexives and Pronouns in Picture Noun Phrase , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Speech recognition: A model and a program for research , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[35]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Interference in the processing of adjunct control , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[37]  C. Phillips,et al.  Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence , 2009, Brain and Language.

[38]  Dario L. J. F. Paape,et al.  Filling the Silence: Reactivation, not Reconstruction , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[39]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[40]  R. Saxe,et al.  A Noisy-Channel Account of Crosslinguistic Word-Order Variation , 2013, Psychological science.

[41]  Wing-Yee Chow,et al.  The Relationship Between Anaphor Features and Antecedent Retrieval: Comparing Mandarin Ziji and Ta-Ziji , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[42]  A. Giannakidou,et al.  Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[43]  David Poeppel,et al.  Feedforward and feedback in speech perception: Revisiting analysis by synthesis , 2011 .

[44]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[45]  R. Ratcliff Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  B. McElree,et al.  A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis , 2008 .

[47]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .

[48]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. , 2009 .

[49]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Natalia Slioussar,et al.  Gender Agreement Attraction in Russian: Production and Comprehension Evidence , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[51]  C. Phillips,et al.  Negative polarity illusions and the format of hierarchical encodings in memory , 2016, Cognition.

[52]  Brian Dillon,et al.  Syntactic Memory in the Comprehension of Reflexive Dependencies: an Overview , 2014, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[53]  Brian Dillon,et al.  Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence , 2013 .

[54]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[55]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Teasing apart retrieval and encoding interference in the processing of anaphors , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[56]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[57]  Laurel Brehm,et al.  The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[58]  Roger Levy,et al.  A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input , 2008, EMNLP 2008.

[59]  Kam L. Wong Analysis or synthesis , 1985 .

[60]  Dan Parker,et al.  Encoding and Accessing Linguistic Representations in a Dynamically Structured Holographic Memory System , 2017, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[61]  J. Kimball Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[62]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[63]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  The mind and brain of short-term memory. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[64]  Satinder Singh,et al.  Computational Rationality: Linking Mechanism and Behavior Through Bounded Utility Maximization , 2014, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[65]  J. V. Van Dyke Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[66]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[67]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human memory: An adaptive perspective. , 1989 .

[68]  R. Jarvella Syntactic processing of connected speech , 1971 .

[69]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power , 2009 .

[70]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  The syntactic domain of anaphora , 1976 .

[71]  Sol Lagoa,et al.  Agreement Processes in Spanish Comprehension , 2014 .

[72]  G. Waters,et al.  Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[73]  C. Felser,et al.  The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives , 2013 .

[74]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[75]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[76]  J. W. Kimball,et al.  Predictive analysis and over-the-top parsing , 1975 .

[77]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[78]  Diogo Almeida,et al.  The complex structure of agreement errors: Evidence from distributional analyses of agreement attraction in Arabic* , 2017 .

[79]  Andrea E. Martin,et al.  Language Processing as Cue Integration: Grounding the Psychology of Language in Perception and Neurophysiology , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[80]  Dave W. Kush,et al.  Respecting Relations: Memory Access and Antecedent Retrieval in Incremental Sentence Processing , 2013 .

[81]  B McElree,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[82]  J. V. Van Dyke Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[83]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  When High-Capacity Readers Slow Down and Low-Capacity Readers Speed Up: Working Memory and Locality Effects , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[84]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Processing Polarity: How the Ungrammatical Intrudes on the Grammatical , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[85]  R. Jarvella,et al.  Clause structure of sentences and speech processing , 1972 .

[86]  J. S. Nairne Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[87]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Sensory Cue Integration , 2011 .

[88]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modeling , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[89]  A. Staub On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[90]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Retrieval Interference in Syntactic Processing: The Case of Reflexive Binding in English , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[91]  Ian Cunnings,et al.  Coargumenthood and the processing of reflexives , 2014 .

[92]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations , 2007 .

[93]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.

[94]  Nathan Salmon,et al.  Reflexivity , 1986, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[95]  E. Matthew Husband,et al.  Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[96]  Richard L. Lewis Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[97]  B. McElree,et al.  Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.