Deferred vs Immediate Stenting in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

[1]  I. Elgendy,et al.  Deferred or immediate stent implantation for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta‐analysis of randomized trials , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[3]  E. Ohman,et al.  Relationship between microvascular obstruction and adverse events following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an individual patient data pooled analysis from seven randomized trials , 2017, European heart journal.

[4]  L. Køber,et al.  Myocardial Damage in Patients With Deferred Stenting After STEMI: A DANAMI-3-DEFER Substudy. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  O. Rimoldi,et al.  Identification of High-Risk Patients After ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Comparison Between Angiographic and Magnetic Resonance Parameters , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[6]  T. Park,et al.  Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: An updated meta-analysis of 10 studies. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[7]  E. Oikonomou,et al.  Role of deferred stenting in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[8]  A. Low,et al.  Invasive Assessment of the Coronary Microcirculation in Reperfused ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: Where Do We Stand? , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Deferred Versus Immediate Stenting in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[10]  R. Choi,et al.  INNOVATION Study (Impact of Immediate Stent Implantation Versus Deferred Stent Implantation on Infarct Size and Microvascular Perfusion in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction) , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Mechanical strategies to enhance myocardial salvage during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DANAMI 3-DEFER): an open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[13]  P. Croisille,et al.  Comparison of Immediate With Delayed Stenting Using the Minimalist Immediate Mechanical Intervention Approach in Acute ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The MIMI Study , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  P. Motreff,et al.  Intra-coronary thrombus evolution during acute coronary syndrome: regression assessment by serial optical coherence tomography analyses. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[15]  C. Berry,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI) , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Rebecca M. Turner,et al.  The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  L. Køber,et al.  Deferred stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot study. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  X. Freixa,et al.  Immediate vs. delayed stenting in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  D. Atar,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation , 2013 .

[20]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  J. Tanguay,et al.  From primary to secondary percutaneous coronary intervention: the emerging concept of early mechanical reperfusion with delayed facilitated stenting-when earlier may not be better. , 2011, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[22]  A. Kastrati,et al.  5-year prognostic value of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  E R McVeigh,et al.  Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[27]  C S Berkey,et al.  A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.