Combining temporal-envelope cues across channels: effects of age and hearing loss.

The goal of this study was to examine the ability to combine temporal-envelope information across frequency channels. Three areas were addressed: (a) the effects of hearing loss, (b) the effects of age and (c) whether such effects increase with the number of frequency channels. Twenty adults aged 23-80 years with hearing loss ranging from mild to severe and a control group of 6 adults with normal hearing participated. Stimuli were vowel-consonant-vowel syllables. Consonant identification was measured for 5 conditions: (a) 1-channel temporal-envelope information (minimal spectral cues), (b) 2-channel, (c) 4-channel, (d) 8-channel, and (e) an unprocessed (maximal spectral cues) speech condition. Performance of listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss was similar in the 1-channel condition. Performance increased with the number of frequency channels in both groups; however, increasing the number of channels led to smaller improvements in consonant identification in listeners with hearing loss. Older listeners performed more poorly than younger listeners but did not have more difficulty combining temporal cues across channels than in a simple, 1-channel temporal task. Age was a significant predictor of nonsense syllable identification, whereas amount of hearing loss was not. The results support an age-related deficit in use of temporal-envelope information with age, regardless of the number of channels.

[1]  M. Schroeder Reference Signal for Signal Quality Studies , 1968 .

[2]  M. D. Wang,et al.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M. Storandt,et al.  Misuse of analysis of covariance in aging research and some partial solutions. , 1975, Experimental aging research.

[4]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop-consonant manner , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  E. Andersen,et al.  The role of temporal factors in auditory perception of consonants and vowels. A study of different age groups. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[6]  T. Langhans,et al.  Speech enhancement by nonlinear multiband envelope filtering , 1982, ICASSP.

[7]  P Howell,et al.  Production and perception of rise time in the voiceless affricate/fricative distinction. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  H J Simon,et al.  Perception of temporal differences in speech by "normal-hearing" adults: effects of age and intensity. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  M F Dorman,et al.  Phonetic identification by elderly normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Natural alteration of speaking rate: the effect on passage comprehension by listeners over 75 years of age. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  R. N. Ohde,et al.  Spectral and duration properties of front vowels as cues to final stop-consonant voicing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P W Alberti,et al.  Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[15]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[16]  L E Humes,et al.  Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  L D Braida,et al.  Single Band Amplitude Envelope Cues as an Aid to Speechreading , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies in young and elderly hearing-impaired subjects. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S. Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  M. Leek,et al.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in vowel identification by listeners with impaired hearing. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  S. Rosen Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  L E Humes,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  C W Turner,et al.  Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  S J Norton,et al.  "Say-stay" identification and psychoacoustic performance of hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Recognition of amplitude-modulation patterns in the presence of a distractor. I. Effects of correlation and frequency relation. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R Drullman,et al.  Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[32]  J H Grose,et al.  Gap detection for pairs of noise bands: effects of stimulus level and frequency separation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  C W Turner,et al.  Effect of single-channel compression on temporal speech information. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[35]  P L Divenyi,et al.  Audiological Correlates of Speech Understanding Deficits in Elderly Listeners with Mild‐to‐Moderate Hearing Loss. I. Age and Lateral Asymmetry Effects , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[36]  Pierre L. Divenyi,et al.  Audiological Correlates of Speech Understanding Deficits in Elderly Listeners with Mild‐to‐Moderate Hearing Loss. II. Correlation Analysis , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[37]  D. Grantham,et al.  Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  C W Turner,et al.  Multichannel compression, temporal cues, and audibility. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  P C Loizou,et al.  On the number of channels needed to understand speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  C. Turner,et al.  Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[41]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Recognition of spectrally degraded speech in noise with nonlinear amplitude mapping , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[42]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Importance of temporal-envelope cues in consonant recognition. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  B A Schneider,et al.  Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  L E Humes,et al.  Factors affecting the recognition of reverberant speech by elderly listeners. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[45]  D. Frisina,et al.  Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  J. Grose,et al.  Gap Duration Discrimination in Listeners with Cochlear Hearing Loss: Effects of Gap and Marker Duration, Frequency Separation, and Mode of Presentation , 2001, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[47]  C. Ponton,et al.  Central Auditory Plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 Complex after Speech-Sound Training , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[48]  Olivier Crouzet,et al.  Temporal envelope expansion of speech in noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: effects on identification performance and response times , 2001, Hearing Research.

[49]  Robert V. Shannon The relative importance of amplitude, temporal, and spectral cues for cochlear implant processor design. , 2002 .

[50]  Jos J. Eggermont,et al.  Changes in cat primary auditory cortex after minor-to-moderate pure-tone induced hearing loss , 2002, Hearing Research.

[51]  Henry Simon,et al.  Age-related alterations in the neural coding of envelope periodicities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[53]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Aging alters the neural representation of speech cues , 2002, Neuroreport.

[54]  Joan Besing,et al.  Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  S. Bacon,et al.  Across-frequency comparison of temporal speech information by listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[56]  Eric W Healy,et al.  The role of contrasting temporal amplitude patterns in the perception of speech. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Richard Schulz,et al.  Investigating Moderator Hypotheses in Aging Research: Statistical, Methodological, and Conceptual Difficulties with Comparing Separate Regressions , 2003, International journal of aging & human development.

[58]  Mary Sue Younger,et al.  Labeling of /s/ and /∫/ by Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing, Revisited , 2003 .

[59]  P. Souza,et al.  Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[60]  Claude Alain,et al.  Aging and the processing of sound duration in human auditory cortex , 2003, Hearing Research.

[61]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Tolerable Hearing Aid Delays. III. Effects on Speech Production and Perception of Across-Frequency Variation in Delay , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[63]  Jennifer J. Lister,et al.  Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[64]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  Identification of envelope-expanded sentences in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners , 2004, Hearing Research.

[65]  Lorienne M Jenstad,et al.  Using Multichannel Wide-Dynamic Range Compression in Severely Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Effects on Speech Recognition and Quality , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[66]  James M. Kates,et al.  Multichannel Dynamic-Range Compression Using Digital Frequency Warping , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..