While shows like The X-Files and 24 have merged conspiracy theories with popular science (fictions), some video games have been pushing the narrative even further. Electronic Art’s Majestic game was released in July 2001 and quickly generated media buzz with its unusual multi-modal gameplay. Mixing phone calls, faxes, instant messaging, real and ‘fake’ websites, and email, the game provides a fascinating case of an attempt at new directions for gaming communities. Through story, mode of playing, and use of technology, Majestic highlights the uncertain status of knowledge, community and self in a digital age; at the same time, it allows examination of alternative ways of understanding games’ role and purpose in the larger culture. Drawing on intricate storylines involving government conspiracies, techno-bio warfare, murder and global terror, players were asked to solve mysteries in the hopes of preventing a devastating future of domination. Because the game drew in both actual and Majestic-owned/-designed websites, it constantly pushed those playing the game right to borders where simulation collides with ‘factuality’. Given the wide variety of ‘legitimate’ conspiracy theory, alien encounters and alternative science web pages, users often could not distinguish when they were leaving the game’s pages and venturing into ‘real’ World Wide Web sites. Its further use of AOL’s instant messenger system, in which gamers spoke not only to bots but to other players, pushed users to evaluate constantly both the status of those they were talking to and the information being provided. Additionally, the game required players to occupy unfamiliar subject positions, ones where agency was attenuated, and which subsequently generated a multi-layered sense of unease among players. This mix of authentic and staged information in conjunction with technologically mediated roles highlights what are often seen as phenomenon endemic to the Internet itself ; that is, the destabilization of categories of knowing, relating, and being.
[1]
D. Mattison.
The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age
,
1997
.
[2]
F. Jameson,et al.
Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism
,
1992
.
[3]
Paul Smith.
Discerning The Subject
,
1988
.
[4]
Steven G. Jones.
Cybersociety 2.0: revisiting computer-mediated communication and community
,
1998
.
[6]
Jane McGonigal.
'This Is Not a Game': Immersive Aesthetics and Collective Play
,
2003
.
[7]
Pierre Lévy,et al.
Becoming Virtual: Reality in the Digital Age
,
1998
.
[8]
Beth Kolko,et al.
Dissolution and fragmentation: problems in on-line communities
,
1998
.
[9]
T. L. Taylor,et al.
"Whose Game Is This Anyway?": Negotiating Corporate Ownership in a Virtual World
,
2002,
CGDC Conf..
[10]
Paul Virilio.
Speed and Information: Cyberspace Alarm!
,
1995
.
[11]
Umberto Eco,et al.
Travels in hyperreality : essays
,
1987
.
[12]
Andrew Darley,et al.
Visual Digital Culture: Surface Play and Spectacle in New Media Genres
,
2000
.
[13]
M. Poster.
The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context
,
1990
.
[14]
Richard Shusterman,et al.
Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism
,
1992
.
[15]
S. Turkle.
Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet
,
1997
.
[16]
R. A. G.,et al.
The War of the Worlds
,
1898,
Nature.
[17]
Jan Fernback,et al.
The individual within the collective: virtual ideology and the realization of collective principles
,
1997
.