An MPEG-2 to H.264 Video Transcoder in the Baseline Profile

Based on our previous efforts, we introduce in this letter a high-efficient MPEG-2 to H.264 transcoder for the baseline profile in the spatial domain. Machine learning tools are used to exploit the correlation between the macroblock (MB) decision of the H.264 video format and the distribution of the motion compensated residual in MPEG-2. Moreover, a dynamic motion estimation technique is also proposed to further speed-up the decision process. Finally, we go a step further on our previous research efforts by combining the two aforementioned speed-up approaches. Our simulation results over more than 40 sequences at common intermediate format and quarter common intermediate format resolutions show that our proposal outperforms the MB mode selection of the rate-distortion optimization option of the H.264 encoder process by reducing the computational requirements by up to 90%, while maintaining the same coding efficiency. Finally, we conduct a comparative study of our approach with the most relevant fast inter-prediction methods for MPEG-2 to H.264 transcoder recently reported in the literature.

[1]  Itu-T and Iso Iec Jtc Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services , 2010 .

[2]  Iain E. G. Richardson,et al.  H.264/MPEG4 Part 10 , 2004 .

[3]  Yoram Singer,et al.  A simple, fast, and effective rule learner , 1999, AAAI 1999.

[4]  Zhi Zhou,et al.  Motion information and coding mode reuse for MPEG-2 to H.264 transcoding , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[5]  Yongdong Zhang,et al.  Efficient block size selection for MPEG-2 to H.264 transcoding , 2004, MULTIMEDIA '04.

[6]  Pedro Cuenca,et al.  Reducing Motion Estimation Complexity in MPEG-2 TO H.264 Transcoding , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[7]  Pedro Cuenca,et al.  Low-Complexity Heterogeneous Video Transcoding Using Data Mining , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[8]  Gary Sullivan,et al.  Recommended Simulation Common Conditions for H.26L Coding Efficiency Experiments on Low Resolution Progressive Scan Source Material , 2001 .

[9]  李青龙 视频压缩标准的新进展——H.264/MPEG-4 Part 10 , 2003 .

[10]  H. Kalva,et al.  Issues in H.264/MPEG-2 video transcoding , 2004, First IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2004. CCNC 2004..

[11]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Rate-constrained coder control and comparison of video coding standards , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[12]  G. Bjontegaard,et al.  Calculation of Average PSNR Differences between RD-curves , 2001 .

[13]  Mohammed Ghanbari,et al.  Heterogeneous Video Transcoding to Lower Spatio-Temporal Resolutions and Different Encoding Formats , 2000, IEEE Trans. Multim..

[14]  Iain E. G. Richardson,et al.  H.264 and MPEG-4 Video Compression: Video Coding for Next-Generation Multimedia , 2003 .

[15]  Pedro Cuenca,et al.  A Fast MB Mode Decision Algorithm for MPEG-2 to H.264 P-Frame Transcoding , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.