Selecting best mapping strategies for storm runoff modeling in a mountainous semi‐arid area

Accurate runoff and soil erosion modeling is constrained by data availability, particularly for physically based models such as OpenLISEM that are data demanding, as the processes are calculated on a cell-by-cell basis. The first decision when using such models is to select mapping units that best reflect the spatial variability of the soil and hydraulic properties in the catchment. In environments with limited data, available maps are usually generic, with large units that may lump together the values of the soil properties, affecting the spatial patterns of the predictions and output values in the outlet. Conversely, the output results may be equally acceptable, following the principle of equifinality. To studyhow the mapping method selected affects the model outputs, four types of input maps with different degrees of complexity were created: average values allocated to general soil map units (ASG1), average values allocated to detailed map units (ASG2), values interpolated by ordinary kriging (OK) and interpolated by kriging with external drift (KED). The study area was Ribeira Seca, a 90 km2 catchment located in Santiago Island, Cape Verde (West Africa), a semi-arid country subject to scarce but extreme rainfall during the short tropical summer monsoon. To evaluate the influence of rainfall on runoff and erosion, two storm events with different intensity and duration were considered. OK and KED inputs produced similar results, with the latter being closer to the observed hydrographs. The highest soil losses were obtained with KED (43 ton ha− 1 for the strongest event). To improve the results of soil loss predictions, higher accurate spatial information on the processes is needed; however, spatial information of input soil properties alone is not enough in complex landscapes. The results demonstrate the importance of selecting the appropriate mapping strategy to obtain reliable runoff and erosion estimates. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[2]  Jean Poesen,et al.  Spatial evaluation of a physically-based distributed erosion model (LISEM) , 1999 .

[3]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Transfer functions and threshold values: from soil characteristics to land qualities. , 1987 .

[4]  Walter G. Lovely,et al.  The Analysis of Soil Surface Roughness , 1970 .

[5]  Renduo Zhang,et al.  Determination of soil sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity from the disk infiltrometer , 1997 .

[6]  J. Feyen,et al.  Comparison of three hydraulic property measurement methods , 1997 .

[7]  D. Bosch,et al.  Hydraulic conductivity variability for two sandy soils , 1998 .

[8]  E. L. Skidmore.  Comment on Chain Method for Measuring Soil Roughness , 1997 .

[9]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[10]  M. Lubczynski,et al.  Topsoil thickness prediction at the catchment scale by integration of invasive sampling, surface geophysics, remote sensing and statistical modeling , 2011 .

[11]  A. D. Roo,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Erosion Conservation Measures with LISEM , 2001 .

[12]  M. Löffler-Mang,et al.  An Optical Disdrometer for Measuring Size and Velocity of Hydrometeors , 2000 .

[13]  M. Moustafa.  A geostatistical approach to optimize the determination of saturated hydraulic conductivity for large-scale subsurface drainage design in Egypt , 2000 .

[14]  V. Jetten,et al.  Exploring effects of rainfall intensity and duration on soil erosion at the catchment scale using openLISEM: Prado catchment, SE Spain , 2012 .

[15]  M. Julià,et al.  Constructing a saturated hydraulic conductivity map of Spain using pedotransfer functions and spatial prediction , 2004 .

[16]  A. D. Roo,et al.  LISEM: a single-event physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins; I: theory, input and output , 1996 .

[17]  J. B. Bebiano.  A geologia do Arquipélago de Cabo Verde , 1932 .

[18]  Dominique King,et al.  Improving the kriging of a soil variable using slope gradient as external drift , 1996 .

[19]  John E. Gilley,et al.  Random Roughness Assessment by the Pin and Chain Method , 1995 .

[20]  Ajay Kumar,et al.  Modelling spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity using Fourier series analysis , 1994 .

[21]  David G. Rossiter,et al.  Prediction of soil depth using environmental variables in an anthropogenic landscape, a case study in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India. , 2009 .

[22]  J. Feyen,et al.  Spatial analysis of saturated hydraulic conductivity in a soil with macropores , 1997 .

[23]  David Russo,et al.  Soil Hydraulic Properties as Stochastic Processes: I. An Analysis of Field Spatial Variability , 1981 .

[24]  Ramesh S. Kanwar,et al.  Comparison of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Measurement Methods for a Glacial-Till Soil , 1994 .

[25]  G. Topp,et al.  COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED AND MEASURED HORIZONTAL Ksat VALUES , 1985 .

[26]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[27]  Edoardo Costantini,et al.  The Land Capability Classification , 2009 .

[28]  Alex. B. McBratney,et al.  Some considerations on methods for spatially aggregating and disaggregating soil information , 1998, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[29]  W. Deming.  Some Criteria for Judging the Quality of Surveys * , 1947 .

[30]  Dominique King,et al.  Using multiple external drifts to estimate a soil variable , 2003 .

[31]  D. Hillel,et al.  COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ASSESSING SOIL HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES , 1993 .

[32]  C. Mannaerts,et al.  Rainfall kinetic energy-intensity and rainfall momentum-intensity relationships for Cape Verde , 2012 .

[33]  Eric B. Sucre,et al.  The Use of Ground-Penetrating Radar to Accurately Estimate Soil Depth in Rocky Forest Soils , 2011 .

[34]  Chris M. Mannaerts,et al.  Influence of topography on rainfall variability in Santiago Island, Cape Verde , 2014 .

[35]  M. S. M. Amin,et al.  Pedo-transfer function for saturated hydraulic conductivity of lowland paddy soils , 2009, Paddy and Water Environment.

[36]  Donald Gabriëls,et al.  A probabilistic approach for predicting rainfall soil erosion losses in semiarid areas , 2000 .

[37]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  Cautionary notes on the use of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil hydraulic properties , 1996 .

[38]  Edzer J. Pebesma,et al.  Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[39]  Gerard Govers,et al.  Erosion models: quality of spatial predictions , 2003 .

[40]  Ali Saleh,et al.  Soil roughness measurement: Chain method , 1993 .

[41]  Olaf Tietje,et al.  Accuracy of the saturated hydraulic conductivity prediction by pedo-transfer functions compared to the variability within FAO textural classes , 1996 .

[42]  Mark A. Nearing,et al.  A Dual Monte Carlo Approach to Estimate Model Uncertainty and its Application to the Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model , 2008 .

[43]  T. Vogel,et al.  Improving hydraulic conductivity estimates from Minidisk infiltrometer measurements for soils with wide pore-size distributions. , 2010 .

[44]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Using Soil Survey Data for Quantitative Land Evaluation , 1989 .

[45]  Brent Clothier,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THREE FIELD METHODS FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY , 1985 .

[46]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[47]  D. Rossiter,et al.  Geophysical and remote sensing-based approach to model regolith thickness in a data-sparse environment , 2011 .

[48]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  Scale dependency in spatial patterns of saturated hydraulic conductivity , 2004 .

[49]  W. Edwards Deming.  Some theory of sampling , 1951 .

[50]  J. D. Jabro,et al.  Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils from particle size distribution and bulk density data , 1992 .

[51]  T. Zeleke,et al.  Scaling Relationships between Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Soil Physical Properties , 2005 .

[52]  J. T. Douglas,et al.  Predicting depressional storage from soil surface roughness. , 2000 .