Choosing the realist framework

There has been an empiricist tradition in the core of Logical Positivism/Empiricism, starting with Moritz Schlick and ending in Herbert Feigl (via Hans Reichenbach), according to which the world of empiricism need not be a barren place devoid of all the explanatory entities posited by scientific theories. The aim of this paper is to articulate this tradition and to explore ways in which its key elements can find a place in the contemporary debate over scientific realism. It presents a way empiricism can go for scientific realism without metaphysical anxiety, by developing an indispensability argument for the adoption of the realist framework. This argument, unlike current realist arguments, has a pragmatic ring to it: there is no ultimate argument for the adoption of the realist framework.

[1]  Grover Maxwell,et al.  The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities , 1962 .

[2]  R. Carnap.  Foundations of Logic and Mathematics , 1937 .

[3]  Michel Ghins,et al.  Putnam’s No-Miracle Argument: A Critique , 2002 .

[4]  R. Carnap.  Meaning and necessity : a study in semantics and modal logic , 1948 .

[5]  Phillipp Frank,et al.  Logical Empiricism I , 2004, Synthese.

[6]  R. Carnap.  Empiricism , Semantics , and Ontology , 2007 .

[7]  S. Psillos.  Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth , 1999 .

[8]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  On Carnap's views on ontology , 1951 .

[9]  M. Alspector-Kelly,et al.  On Quine on Carnap on Ontology , 2001 .

[10]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Ontology and ideology , 1951 .

[11]  H. Reichenbach.  Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge , 1938 .

[12]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[13]  Stathis Psillos,et al.  Tracking the Real: Through Thick and Thin , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[14]  Wilfrid S. Sellars.  Science, perception, and reality , 1963 .

[15]  R. Carnap.  The Two Concepts of Probability: The Problem of Probability , 1945 .

[16]  Stathis Psillos.  On Reichenbach’s argument for scientific realism , 2009, Synthese.

[17]  Steve Clarke,et al.  Recent Themes in the Philosophy of Science , 2002 .

[18]  Herbert Feigl,et al.  Existential Hypotheses. Realistic versus Phenomenalistic Interpretations , 1950, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  Willard Van Orman Quine.  Ontology and Ideology Revisited , 1983 .

[20]  M. Schlick,et al.  Positivismus und Realismus , 1932 .

[21]  H. Reichenbach.  Experience And Prediction , 1938 .