Impact of the flexible spectrum aggregation schemes on the cost of future mobile network

Nowadays the spectrum regulations landscape is changing towards more flexible spectrum management schemes, such trends are expected to make additional spectrum resources available and lowers the spectrum access hurdles. In this paper, different spectrum aggregation scenarios have been compared focusing on the tradeoff between the total cost of ownership and the targeted QoS under different market conditions. The main finding in this study thereof indicates that the addition of more spectrum resources will lead to an overall reduction in the total cost of ownership (TCO) as long as the spectrum price remains small compared to the cost of the network infrastructure. Moreover, schemes such as LSA and secondary access will enable operators who have insufficient licensed spectrum resource to expand their mobile network infrastructure especially in hotspots with high subscribers demand in a cost-effective way. In this regard, the harmonization of spectrum use for LSA and TVWS across multiple countries stands as a key requirement for the reduction of the production cost of equipment and hence, the creation of an economy of scale considering both of the network equipment (i.e. radio base station) and end-subscriber devices.

[1]  Marina Petrova,et al.  Wi-Fi, but not on Steroids: Performance analysis of a Wi-Fi-like Network operating in TVWS under realistic conditions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[2]  Zoraida Frias,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of femtocell deployment in long-term evolution networks , 2012, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[3]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  Mobile Broadband Expansion Calls for More Spectrum or Base Stations - Analysis of the Value of Spectrum and the Role of Spectrum Aggregation , 2010 .

[4]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  A comparative study of deployment options, capacity and cost structure for macrocellular and femtocell networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications Workshops.

[5]  Antonio Nicita,et al.  Authorised Shared Access (ASA): An Innovative Model of Pro-Competitive Spectrum Management , 2011 .

[6]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Spectrum Aggregation Technology: Benefit- Cost Analysis and its Impact on Spectrum Value , 2011 .

[7]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  Impact of deployment costs and spectrum prices on the business viability of mobile broadband using TV white space , 2012, 2012 7th International ICST Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CROWNCOM).

[8]  Yang Yang,et al.  Carrier aggregation for LTE-advanced mobile communication systems , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Hauke Holtkamp,et al.  Enhancing the Energy Efficiency of Radio Base Stations , 2013, ArXiv.

[10]  Ki Won Sung,et al.  A techno-economic framework of spectrum combining for indoor capacity provisioning , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[11]  Chandan Bhagat,et al.  Technological and cost-based comparison of next generation PON technologies : 10 GPON and WDM PON , 2011 .

[12]  Jens Zander,et al.  Impact of Backhauling Power Consumption on the Deployment of Heterogeneous Mobile Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[13]  Petri Mähönen,et al.  Riding the data tsunami in the cloud: myths and challenges in future wireless access , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Pedro Ferreira,et al.  Infrastructure Sharing as an Opportunity to Promote Competition in Local Access Networks , 2012, J. Comput. Networks Commun..

[15]  Luc Martens,et al.  Energy efficiency of femtocell deployment in combined wireless/optical access networks , 2013, Comput. Networks.

[16]  Lan Chen,et al.  Hybrid Spectrum Usage for Overlaying LTE Macrocell and Femtocell , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.