Synergizing in Cyberinfrastructure Development

This paper investigates the work of creating infrastructure, using as a case study the development of cyberinfrastructure for metagenomics research. Specifically, the analysis focuses on the role of embeddedness in infrastructure development. We expand on the notion of human infrastructure to develop the concepts of synergizing, leveraging, and aligning, which denote the active processes of creating and managing relationships among people, organizations, and technologies in the creation of cyberinfrastructure. This conceptual lens highlights how embeddedness is not only an important result of infrastructure development, but is also a precursor that can act as both a constraint and a resource for development activities.

[1]  W A Wulf,et al.  The collaboratory opportunity. , 1993, Science.

[2]  E. Marshall.  Bermuda Rules: Community Spirit, With Teeth , 2001, Science.

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[5]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[6]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Infrastructuring for the long-term: ecological information management , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[7]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science , 2005, Science.

[8]  S. Kravitz,et al.  CAMERA: A Community Resource for Metagenomics , 2007, PLoS biology.

[9]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[10]  Andrew A. Chien,et al.  The OptIPuter , 2003, CACM.

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[12]  Christopher Gad,et al.  On the Consequences of Post-ANT , 2010 .

[13]  G. Olson,et al.  Scientific Collaboration on the Internet , 2008 .

[14]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  NEESgrid: Lessons Learned for Future Cyberinfrastructure Development , 2008 .

[16]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[17]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[18]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[19]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Tensions across the scales: planning infrastructure for the long-term , 2007, GROUP.

[20]  Cecilia R. Aragon,et al.  Context-linked virtual assistants for distributed teams: an astrophysics case study , 2008, CSCW.

[21]  Chris F. Taylor,et al.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  A. Strauss.  THE ARTICULATION OF PROJECT WORK: AN ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS , 1988 .

[23]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[24]  S. L. Star,et al.  How to Infrastructure , 2002 .

[25]  Christina Courtright,et al.  Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[26]  George M. Garrity,et al.  Standards in Genomic Sciences , 2009, Standards in genomic sciences.

[27]  Carla Simone,et al.  Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design , 1996, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[28]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[29]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Collaboration in Metagenomics: Sequence Databases and the Organization of Scientific Work , 2009, ECSCW.

[30]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Work at the Boundaries of Science: Information and the Interdisciplinary Research Process , 2001 .

[31]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  e-Science and its implications , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[33]  Elihu M. Gerson,et al.  Reach, Bracket, and the Limits of Rationalized Coordination: Some Challenges for CSCW , 2008, Theory in CSCW.

[34]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  NetWORKers and their Activity in Intensional Networks , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[35]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[36]  C. Palmer.  Work at the Boundaries of Science , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[37]  David Theo Goldberg,et al.  A Manifesto for the Humanities in a Technological Age , 2004 .

[38]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure , 2006, CSCW '06.

[39]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[40]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Collaboratories , 2002, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  J. Simpson,et al.  The Oxford English Dictionary , 1884 .

[42]  Cory P. Knobel,et al.  Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design , 2007 .

[43]  S. Traweek,et al.  Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists , 1988 .

[44]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..