Holistic Assessment of Situated Cooking Interactions: Preliminary Results of an Observational Study

This study presents the preliminary results of in situ observations of 2 cooking moments among 16 households. The aim of the study was to map the domestic cooking ecosystem from a user’s perspective and define which components of that environment influence the user’s cooking experience. Preliminary results show that contextual components and in particular, situations, shape cooking experiences in the domestic kitchen. Four opposite situational contexts, i.e., cooking for oneself or cooking for guests, cooking on a weekday or cooking during the weekend, cooking routine dishes or cooking dishes for the first time, and cooking alone or cooking together were distinguished. Situational context will influence temporal context, social context, physical context perceptions and information and task context of the cooking activity. These will in turn influence interactions with objects (i.e., ingredients, kitchen utensils), kitchen technology and their interfaces, content and other people present during the cooking activity. This study suggests that future kitchen technologies can match or enhance current practices only if designers and user researchers understand and define their situational context. This study goes beyond the state of the art, as this is the first study that aims to provide a holistic analysis of the current state of domestic cooking experiences using in-situ observations in order to inform design of future technologies. Implications for design are discussed.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[2]  Andrew Tokmakoff,et al.  Designing socially acceptable multimodal interaction in cooking assistants , 2011, IUI '11.

[3]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[4]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[5]  Bill Buxton,et al.  Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design , 2007 .

[6]  Wendy Ju,et al.  CounterActive: an interactive cookbook for the kitchen counter , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Richard Harper,et al.  Celebratory technology: new directions for food research in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[8]  Margaretha Nydahl,et al.  The Meal as a Gift—The Meaning of Cooking Among Retired Women , 2000 .

[9]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  MimiCook: a cooking assistant system with situated guidance , 2014, TEI '14.

[10]  Ben Kirman,et al.  There's a monster in my kitchen: using aversive feedback to motivate behaviour change , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  Pei-Yu Chi,et al.  Designing Smart Living Objects - Enhancing vs. Distracting Traditional Human-Object Interaction , 2007, HCI.

[12]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies , 2005, TCHI.

[13]  Daniel Jackson,et al.  The french kitchen: task-based learning in an instrumented kitchen , 2012, UbiComp.

[14]  Luc Martens,et al.  Linking an integrated framework with appropriate methods for measuring QoE , 2010, 2010 Second International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[15]  J. H. Crouch,et al.  SSR analysis of cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm resistant to rust and late leaf spot diseases , 2006, Euphytica.

[16]  Stephanie Van Hove,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction to Human-Computer-Context Interaction: Towards a Conceptual Framework for Conducting User Studies for Shifting Interfaces , 2018, HCI.

[17]  Ronald Poppe,et al.  Evaluating the Future of HCI: Challenges for the Evaluation of Emerging Applications , 2007, Artifical Intelligence for Human Computing.

[18]  Hiroshi Murase,et al.  Video CooKing: Towards the Synthesis of Multimedia Cooking Recipes , 2011, MMM.

[19]  Taysheng Jeng,et al.  Sociable kitchen: Interactive recipe system in kitchen island , 2009 .

[20]  Michael Macht,et al.  The Pleasures of Eating: A Qualitative Analysis , 2005 .

[21]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Augmenting kitchen appliances with a shared context using knowledge about daily events , 2006, IUI '06.

[22]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Kitchen stories: sharing recipes with the Living Cookbook , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[23]  Shin'ichi Satoh,et al.  Cooking navi: assistant for daily cooking in kitchen , 2005, ACM Multimedia.

[24]  Hirokazu Kato,et al.  Remote assistance using visual prompts for demented elderly in cooking , 2011, ISABEL '11.

[25]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Web browsing on mobile phones : characteristics of user experience ; Internet-selailu kännykällä - käyttäjäkokemuksen piirteitä , 2009 .

[26]  Timo Saari,et al.  Understanding the most influential user experiences in successful and unsuccessful technology adoptions , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Sebastian Möller,et al.  Quality-of-user-experience: a position paper , 2018 .

[28]  Jan O. Borchers,et al.  First-person cooking: a dual-perspective interactive kitchen counter , 2010, CHI EA '10.

[29]  Silvia Gherardi,et al.  Situated Knowledge and Situated Action: What do Practice-Based Studies Promise? , 2008 .

[30]  Johanna Gummerus,et al.  Context and mobile services' value-in-use , 2011 .

[31]  David Marshall,et al.  Living Together and Eating Together: Changes in Food Choice and Eating Habits during the Transition from Single to Married/Cohabiting , 1998 .

[32]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Theory and method for experience centered design , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[33]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  COOK’S COLLAGE , 2005 .

[34]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Domestic Routines and Design for the Home , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[35]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[36]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  On tangible user interfaces, humans and spatiality , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[37]  Pei-Yu Chi,et al.  Enabling Calorie-Aware Cooking in a Smart Kitchen , 2008, PERSUASIVE.

[38]  John Zimmerman,et al.  How routine learners can support family coordination , 2010, CHI.

[39]  Menno D. T. de Jong,et al.  Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[40]  Kewalin Angkananon,et al.  Towards a Technology Enhanced Interaction Framework , 2013 .

[41]  Álvaro Marco,et al.  A Smart Kitchen for Ambient Assisted Living , 2014, Sensors.

[42]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Connecting in the Kitchen: An Empirical Study of Physical Interactions while Cooking Together at Home , 2015, CSCW.

[43]  Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö,et al.  Framing the Context of Use for Mobile HCI , 2010, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[44]  Donna Maurer,et al.  Comfort Foods: An Exploratory Journey Into The Social and Emotional Significance of Food , 2005 .

[45]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[46]  Masahiko Inami,et al.  Experience "panavi,": challenge to master professional culinary arts , 2012, CHI EA '12.

[47]  Mark Newman,et al.  SuChef: an in-kitchen display to assist with "everyday" cooking , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[48]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Context-aware kitchen utilities , 2007, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[49]  Angela Meah,et al.  Reflections on the Use of Visual Methods in a Qualitative Study of Domestic Kitchen Practices , 2016 .

[50]  Jeni Paay,et al.  Indexing to situated interactions , 2006 .

[51]  Frank Vetere,et al.  Kitchen kinesics: situating gestural interaction within the social contexts of family cooking , 2014, OZCHI.