Altruists, Egoists and Hooligans in a Local Interaction Model

This paper studies a population of agents, each of whom can be either an Altruist or an Egoist. Altruists confer benefits on others at a cost to themselves. Altruism is thus a strictly dominated strategy and cannot survive if agents are rational best-responders. We assume that agents choose their actions by imitating others who earn high payoffs. We also assume that interactions between agents are local, so that each agent affects (and is affected by) only his neighbors. Altruists can survive in such a world if they are grouped together, so that the benefits of altruism are enjoyed primarily by other Altruists, who then earn relatively high payoffs and are imitated.

[1]  S. Wright Population structure in evolution. , 1949, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society.

[2]  John G. Kemeny,et al.  Finite Markov Chains. , 1960 .

[3]  V. Wynne-Edwards Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour , 1962 .

[4]  L. Brower,et al.  Birds, butterflies, and plant poisons: A study in ecological chemistry , 1964, Zoologica : scientific contributions of the New York Zoological Society..

[5]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[7]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[8]  George Williams Group Selection , 1971 .

[9]  I. Eshel On the neighbor effect and the evolution of altruistic traits. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  D. Wilson A theory of group selection. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  I. Eshel,et al.  On the founder effect and the evolution of altruistic traits. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[12]  John G. Kemeny,et al.  Finite Markov chains , 1960 .

[13]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma , 1982 .

[14]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  Assortment of encounters and evolution of cooperativeness. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Valerie Isham,et al.  Non‐Negative Matrices and Markov Chains , 1983 .

[16]  F. M. Stewart,et al.  The population biology of bacterial viruses: why be temperate. , 1984, Theoretical Population Biology.

[17]  M. Freidlin,et al.  Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems , 1984 .

[18]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[19]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information , 1986 .

[20]  V. Wynne-Edwards Evolution Through Group Selection , 1986 .

[21]  J. Andreoni IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[22]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[23]  Michihiro Kandori Social Norms and Community Enforcement , 1992 .

[24]  Glenn Ellison Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination , 1993 .

[25]  T. Bergstrom,et al.  How Altruism Can Prevail in an Evolutionary Environment , 1993 .

[26]  H. Young,et al.  The Evolution of Conventions , 1993 .

[27]  R. Rob,et al.  Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games , 1993 .

[28]  M. Nowak,et al.  THE SPATIAL DILEMMAS OF EVOLUTION , 1993 .

[29]  L. Blume The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction , 1993 .

[30]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Muddling Through: Noisy Equilibrium Selection☆ , 1997 .

[31]  L. Samuelson Stochastic Stability in Games with Alternative Best Replies , 1994 .

[32]  M. Nowak,et al.  MORE SPATIAL GAMES , 1994 .

[33]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Social Norms and Random Matching Games , 1995 .

[34]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Case-Based Decision Theory , 1995 .

[35]  Itzhak Gilboa,et al.  Case-Based Optimization , 1996 .

[36]  A. Shaked,et al.  Evolutionary D Ynamics of Populations with a Local Interaction Structure Evolutionary D Ynamics of Populations with a Local Interaction Structure , 1996 .