Collaborative Analytics for Astrophysics Explorations

Many of todayʼs important scientific breakthroughs are made by large, interdisciplinary collaborations of scientists working in geographically distributed locations, producing and collecting vast and complex datasets. Experimental astrophysics, in particular, has recently become a data-intensive science after many decades of relative data poverty. These large-scale science projects require software tools that support not only insight into complex data but collaborative science discovery. Such projects do not easily lend themselves to fully automated solutions, requiring hybrid human–automation systems that facilitate scientist input at key points throughout the data analysis and scientific discovery process. This chapter presents some of the issues to consider when developing such software tools, and describes Sunfall, a collaborative visual analytics system developed for the Nearby Supernova Factory, an international astrophysics experiment and the largest data volume supernova search currently in operation. Sunfall utilizes novel interactive visualization and analysis techniques to facilitate deeper scientific insight into complex, noisy, high-dimensional, high-volume, time-critical data. The system combines novel image-processing algorithms, statistical analysis, and machine learning with highly interactive visual interfaces to enable collaborative, user-driven scientific exploration of supernova image and spectral data. Sunfall is currently in operation at the Nearby Supernova Factory; it is the first visual analytics system in production use at a major astrophysics project. The chapter concludes with a set of guidelines and lessons learned about developing software to support scientific collaborations.

[1]  Daniel J. Garland,et al.  Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement , 2009 .

[2]  Chi-Wing Fu,et al.  Scalable WIM: Effective Exploration in Large-scale Astrophysical Environments , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Christophe Bonnaud,et al.  SNIFS: a wideband integral field spectrograph with microlens arrays , 2003, SPIE Optical Systems Design.

[4]  R. Ellis,et al.  The Supernova Legacy Survey: Measurement of Omega_M, Omega_Lambda,and w from the First Year Data Set , 2005, astro-ph/0510447.

[5]  Laurent Mazuray,et al.  Optical Design and Engineering IV , 2011 .

[6]  William Wright,et al.  GeoTime Information Visualization , 2004 .

[7]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Mobile Devices in Emergency Medical Services: User Evaluation of a PDA-Based Interface for Ambulance Run Reporting , 2007, Mobile Response.

[8]  W. A. Joye,et al.  New Features of SAOImage DS9 , 2003 .

[9]  David S. Ebert,et al.  Visual Analytics on Mobile Devices for Emergency Response , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[10]  Cecilia R. Aragon,et al.  Context-linked virtual assistants for distributed teams: an astrophysics case study , 2008, CSCW.

[11]  Cecilia R. Aragon,et al.  Improving aviation safety with information visualization: a flight simulation study , 2005, CHI.

[12]  R. Ellis,et al.  Measurements of $\Omega$ and $\Lambda$ from 42 high redshift supernovae , 1998, astro-ph/9812133.

[13]  Ralph Roskies,et al.  Fourier Descriptors for Plane Closed Curves , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[14]  S. Bailey,et al.  How to Find More Supernovae with Less Work: Object Classification Techniques for Difference Imaging , 2006, 0705.0493.

[15]  J. Prieto,et al.  THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY-II SUPERNOVA SURVEY: SEARCH ALGORITHM AND FOLLOW-UP OBSERVATIONS , 2007, 0708.2750.

[16]  Rollin C. Thomas,et al.  Sunfall: a collaborative visual analytics system for astrophysics , 2008 .

[17]  King-Sun Fu,et al.  Shape Discrimination Using Fourier Descriptors , 1977, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[18]  David S. Ebert,et al.  Interactive Visualization and Analysis of Network and Sensor Data on Mobile Devices , 2006, 2006 IEEE Symposium On Visual Analytics Science And Technology.

[19]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Fourier Coding of Image Boundaries , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  R. Bacon,et al.  Overview of the Nearby Supernova Factory , 2002, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[21]  Eduardo Serrano,et al.  LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products , 2008, The Astrophysical Journal.

[22]  Stephen G. Eick,et al.  Thin Client Visualization , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[23]  Cecilia R. Aragon,et al.  Using visual analytics to maintain situation awareness in astrophysics , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[24]  Kristin A. Cook,et al.  Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics , 2005 .

[25]  Stephen Kent Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 1994 .

[26]  John R. Goodall,et al.  Balancing Interactive Data Management of Massive Data with Situational Awareness through Smart Aggregation , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[27]  M. Phillips,et al.  Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant , 1998, astro-ph/9805201.

[28]  Ronald Mak,et al.  Reliable Service– Oriented Architecture for NASA’s Mars Exploration Rover Mission , 2005, 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[29]  Cecilia R. Aragon,et al.  A fast contour descriptor algorithm for supernova image classification , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[30]  Chris H. Q. Ding,et al.  Supernova Recognition Using Support Vector Machines , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA'06).

[31]  Prasenjit Mitra,et al.  FemaRepViz: Automatic Extraction and Geo-Temporal Visualization of FEMA National Situation Updates , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[32]  W. Wood-Vasey Rates and progenitors of type Ia supernovae , 2004, astro-ph/0505604.