Managing e‐Government: value positions and relationships

Public sector managers take much of the responsibility for selecting, commissioning, implementing and realising benefits from information technology (IT) projects. However, e‐Government initiatives often suffer from complexity, vision failure, lack of goal clarity and insufficient commitment. These problems may stem from value traditions that are deeply ingrained in managers' cultural environments but not always in harmony with each other. A first step towards working with value complexity is to understand it; we synthesise a model of value positions for e‐Government derived from major traditions in the public administration literature. Four value positions relevant to e‐Government together with their IT assumptions are identified; they reflect the ideals of professionalism, efficiency, service and engagement. A qualitative investigation of Danish local authority managers displays both value congruence and value divergence. The interpretive study results in a theoretical model that combines value positions and relationships, and the model's implications for researchers and practitioners in focusing successful e‐Government initiatives are outlined.

[1]  Michael L. Best,et al.  Impact and Sustainability of E-Government Services in Developing Countries: Lessons Learned from Tamil Nadu, India , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[2]  Saad Haj Bakry,et al.  Development of e‐government: a STOPE view , 2004, International Journal of Network Management.

[3]  Joan C. Steyaert Measuring the performance of electronic government services , 2004 .

[4]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Z. Wal,et al.  Is Public Value Pluralism Paramount? The Intrinsic Multiplicity and Hybridity of Public Values , 2009 .

[6]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  Toward a Theory of the Public for Public Administration , 1991 .

[7]  R. Denhardt,et al.  The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering , 2000 .

[8]  Linda Shields,et al.  Content Analysis , 2015 .

[9]  Robin Gauld,et al.  Public sector information system project failures: Lessons from a New Zealand hospital organization , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[11]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Public Sector Reforms and the Notion of 'Public Value': Implications for eGovernment Deployment , 2009, AMCIS.

[12]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information infrastructure, governance, and socio-economic development in developing countries , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Saggi Nevo,et al.  Classifying Information Technologies: A Multidimensional Scaling Approach , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  eParticipation: Designing and Managing Political Discussion Forums , 2010 .

[15]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Reconciling two approaches to critical success factors: The case of shared services in the public sector , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[16]  John Fenwick,et al.  The Elected Mayor and Local Leadership , 2005 .

[17]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[19]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Mis problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective , 1977 .

[20]  Chien-Chih Yu A value-based strategic management process for e-government strategy planning and performance control , 2007, ICEGOV.

[21]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Conflicts in implementing interoperability: Re-operationalizing basic values , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Mahadeo Jaiswal,et al.  A conceptual framework for measuring public value of enterprise applications , 2009, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[23]  Philip W. Graham,et al.  Predication and propagation : a method for analyzing evaluative meanings in technology policy , 2002 .

[24]  Paul Foley,et al.  The Real Benefits, Beneficiaries and Value of E-Government , 2005 .

[25]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[26]  Jianwei Liu,et al.  eGovernment Project Evaluation: An Integrated Framework , 2008, EGOV.

[27]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  E-government value priorities of Danish local authority managers , 2012 .

[28]  Wing Lam,et al.  Barriers to e-government integration , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Alina M. Chircu E-government evaluation: towards a multidimensional framework , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[30]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  M. Moore,et al.  PUBLIC VALUE AS THE FOCUS OF STRATEGY , 1994 .

[32]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  John Dewey,et al.  Theory of valuation , 1939 .

[34]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[35]  Rhoda C. Joseph,et al.  A comprehensive framework for the assessment of eGovernment projects , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  R. Moe,et al.  THE REINVENTING GOVERNMENT EXERCISE: MISINTERPRETING THE PROBLEM, MISJUDGING THE CONSEQUENCES , 1994 .

[38]  Benoît Otjacques,et al.  Interoperability of E-Government Information Systems: Issues of Identification and Data Sharing , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Paul A. Swatman,et al.  Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research , 2000, ECIS.

[40]  Peter Axel Nielsen,et al.  IT Management in Local Government: The DISIMIT Project , 2012 .

[41]  Linda Deleon,et al.  The Political Theory of Reinvention , 2000 .

[42]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  N. Fairclough Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research , 2003 .

[44]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. , 1979 .

[45]  Mustafa O. Attir,et al.  Field Research: A Manual for Logistics and Management of Scientific Studies in Natural Settings , 1979 .

[46]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[47]  S. Schwartz Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[48]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[49]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  MIS Problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the cause , 1977 .

[50]  B. Bozeman,et al.  Public Values , 2007 .

[51]  Tânia Margarete Mezzomo Keinert,et al.  Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector , 1993 .

[52]  J. Patrick Dobel,et al.  Public Management as Ethics , 2007 .

[53]  William Golden,et al.  Understanding Net Benefits: A Citizen-Based Perspective on eGovernment Success , 2009, ICIS.

[54]  John Krogstie,et al.  What is the value of eGovernment – and how can we actually realize it? , 2009 .

[55]  Michael Grimsley,et al.  Attaining social value from electronic government , 2008 .

[56]  Yu Chien-Chih A value-based strategic management process for e-government strategy planning and performance control , 2007 .

[57]  Ulrik Kjaer,et al.  Municipal Amalgamations and the Democratic Functioning of Local Councils: The Case of The Danish 2007 Structural Reform , 2010 .

[58]  Soonhee Kim,et al.  South Korean Public Officials' Perceptions of Values, Failure, and Consequences of Failure in E-Government Leadership , 2003 .

[59]  A. Sikula,et al.  The Values and Value Systems of Governmental Executives , 1973 .

[60]  R. Horowitz,et al.  Field Research: A Manual for Logistics and Management of Scientific Studies in Natural Settings. , 1980 .

[61]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[62]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[63]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Identifying the security risks associated with governmental use of cloud computing , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[64]  G. Garson,et al.  Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State , 2008 .

[65]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[66]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[67]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[68]  M. Zairi,et al.  Critical Success Factors of E-Government: A Proposed Model for E-Government Implementation , 2006, 2006 Innovations in Information Technology.

[69]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[70]  J. Rockart The changing role of the information systems executive : a critical success factors perspective , 1982 .

[71]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Government Value Paradigms - Bureaucracy, New Public Management, and E-Government , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[72]  J. Sheyholislami,,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis , 2019, Research Methods for Classroom Discourse.

[73]  Frank Bannister,et al.  ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[74]  M. Rutgers,et al.  Sorting Out Public Values? On the Contingency of Value Classification in Public Administration , 2008 .

[75]  David Osborne,et al.  Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government , 1997 .

[76]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[77]  Sabrina Ching Yuen Luk,et al.  The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[78]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[79]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[80]  M. Moore Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[81]  Trudi C. Miller The Operation of Democratic Institutions , 1989 .

[82]  Shoshana Zuboff Automatefin-fonnate: The two faces of intelligent technology , 1985 .

[83]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic.@@@Bureaucratic Power in Society. , 1985 .

[84]  Robin Gauld,et al.  Dangerous Enthusiasms: E-government, Computer Failure and Information System Development , 2006 .

[85]  Montgomery Van Wart,et al.  Changing Public Sector Values , 1998 .

[86]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Walking atop the cliffs: avoiding failure and reducing risk in large scale e-government projects , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[87]  Barney Tan,et al.  Demystifying case research: A structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[88]  Y. Lacasse,et al.  From the authors , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.