Incorporation of ARMA models into flow forecasting by artificial neural networks

A frequently encountered problem during the application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) to various water resource problems is the limitation of the data sets required for the training stage of ANNs. This prevents ANNs from learning input and output data sets within different ranges, thus decreasing the prediction capability during the testing stage. In this article the well known ARMA models are used to generate synthetic series, and these series are incorporated into the training data sets of ANNs. The method is applied to the monthly mean river flow data of a station in the East Mediterranean region of Turkey. The forecasting accuracy of the future monthly flows carries significance because a water reservoir is planned for the downstream of this station. Because the available data record length is limited studies should be carried out to extend the training data set of ANNs. It is seen that the extension of input and output data sets in the training stage improves the accuracy of forecasting using ANNs. The introduction of periodicity components in the input layer also increases the forecasting accuracy of ANNs. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  B. Bobée,et al.  Multivariate Reservoir Inflow Forecasting Using Temporal Neural Networks , 2001 .

[2]  Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu,et al.  A Method Based on Taking the Average of Probabilities to Compute the Flow Duration Curve , 2000 .

[3]  K. Thirumalaiah,et al.  Hydrological Forecasting Using Neural Networks , 2000 .

[4]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu,et al.  Application of Gamma Autoregressive Model to Analysis of Dry Periods , 1998 .

[6]  A. W. Jayawardena,et al.  Runoff Forecasting Using RBF Networks with OLS Algorithm , 1998 .

[7]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[8]  H. Raman,et al.  Multivariate modelling of water resources time series using artificial neural networks , 1995 .

[9]  N. J. De Vos Rainfall-Runoff modelling using artificial neural networks , 2003 .

[10]  A. Elshorbagy,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Networks for Runoff Prediction , 2000 .

[11]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall‐Runoff Process , 1995 .

[12]  W. Kirby,et al.  Computer‐oriented Wilson‐Hilferty transformation that preserves the first three moments and the lower bound of the Pearson type 3 distribution , 1972 .

[13]  A. Tokar,et al.  Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[14]  Andrew Metcalfe,et al.  Bivariate stochastic modelling of ephemeral streamflow , 2002 .

[15]  A. Soldati,et al.  Forecasting river flow rate during low‐flow periods using neural networks , 1999 .

[16]  A. Soldati,et al.  River flood forecasting with a neural network model , 1999 .

[17]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Neural network PC tools: a practical guide , 1990 .

[18]  H. Kerem Cigizoglu,et al.  A generalized seasonal model for flow duration curve , 2000 .