Law and Neuroscience

This article discusses how the intersection of perennial legal questions and new neuroscientific advances has fueled the emergence of a new field: law and neuroscience. It provides an overview of issues, discussing both the promise and the limitations.

[1]  Michael S. Pardo,et al.  Philosophical foundations of law and neuroscience , 2016, Legal Theory and the Natural Sciences Volume VI.

[2]  Alisa R Gutman,et al.  A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience , 2014 .

[3]  K. Kiehl,et al.  The Impact of Neuroimages in the Sentencing Phase of Capital Trials , 2014 .

[4]  M. Farah,et al.  Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Neuroscientists in court , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  O. Jones Seven Ways Neuroscience Aids Law , 2013 .

[7]  S. Lilienfeld,et al.  Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience , 2013 .

[8]  Daeyeol Lee Decision Making: From Neuroscience to Psychiatry , 2013, Neuron.

[9]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Neuroprediction of future rearrest , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M. Chun,et al.  Neurolaw: Differential brain activity for Black and White faces predicts damage awards in hypothetical employment discrimination cases , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[11]  R. Marois,et al.  The roots of modern justice: cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Moreno,et al.  Neuroscience, Ethics, and National Security: The State of the Art , 2012, PLoS biology.

[13]  Dardo Tomasi,et al.  Addiction circuitry in the human brain. , 2012, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[14]  S. Morse,et al.  Avoiding Irrational NeuroLaw Exuberance: A Plea for Neuromodesty , 2011 .

[15]  Wendell Wallach,et al.  From Robots to Techno Sapiens: Ethics, Law and Public Policy in the Development of Robotics and Neurotechnologies , 2011 .

[16]  Francis X. Shen,et al.  Law and Neuroscience in the United States , 2011 .

[17]  M. E. Smith,et al.  Are prescription stimulants "smart pills"? The epidemiology and cognitive neuroscience of prescription stimulant use by normal healthy individuals. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  S. Morse Lost in Translation?: An Essay on Law and Neuroscience , 2011 .

[19]  E. Murphy,et al.  Neuroimages as Evidence in a Mens Rea Defense: No Impact , 2011 .

[20]  N. J. Schweitzer,et al.  Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense. , 2011, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[21]  P. Legrenzi,et al.  Neuromania: On the limits of brain science , 2011 .

[22]  S. Danziger,et al.  Extraneous factors in judicial decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Owen D. Jones,et al.  Brain Scans as Evidence: Truths, Proofs, Lies, and Lessons , 2011 .

[24]  R. Bonnie Responsibility for Addiction , 2011, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[25]  J Peter Rosenfeld,et al.  A mock terrorism application of the P300-based concealed information test. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Lessons from Libet , 2010 .

[27]  A. Roskies,et al.  How does neuroscience affect our conception of volition? , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  Anthony D. Wagner,et al.  Detecting individual memories through the neural decoding of memory states and past experience , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Brian Y. Hwang,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces: military, neurosurgical, and ethical perspective. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[30]  Virginia Hughes,et al.  Science in court: Head case , 2010, Nature.

[31]  K. Nader,et al.  Memory reconsolidation: an update , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  B. Luna,et al.  What has fMRI told us about the Development of Cognitive Control through Adolescence? , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  Laurence Steinberg,et al.  Are adolescents less mature than adults?: minors' access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA "flip-flop". , 2009, The American psychologist.

[34]  Kenneth A. Norman,et al.  Recollection, Familiarity, and Cortical Reinstatement: A Multivoxel Pattern Analysis , 2009, Neuron.

[35]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  A. McKee,et al.  Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in Athletes: Progressive Tauopathy After Repetitive Head Injury , 2009, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[37]  E. Murphy,et al.  Through a scanner darkly: functional neuroimaging as evidence of a criminal defendant's past mental states. , 2009, Stanford law review.

[38]  T. Maroney,et al.  The False Promise of Adolescent Brain Science in Juvenile Justice , 2009 .

[39]  O. Goodenough,et al.  Law, Mind and Brain , 2009 .

[40]  D. Eagleman,et al.  Why Neuroscience Matters for a Rational Drug Policy , 2009 .

[41]  B. Bottoms,et al.  Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law. , 2009, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[42]  David H. Zald,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Third-Party Punishment , 2008, Neuron.

[43]  John Harris,et al.  Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy , 2008, Nature.

[44]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Law and neuroscience , 2011 .

[45]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  The influence of prior record on moral judgment , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[47]  H. Greely Neuroscience and Criminal Justice: Not Responsibility but Treatment , 2008 .

[48]  Mahzarin R. Banaji,et al.  The Neural Basis of Implicit Attitudes , 2008 .

[49]  L. Steinberg A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking. , 2008, Developmental review : DR.

[50]  Deena Skolnick Weisberg,et al.  The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  A. Roskies Response to Sie and Wouters: A neuroscientific challenge to free will and responsibility? , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Kay L. Levine,et al.  The role of imaging in United States courtrooms. , 2007, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[53]  Judy Illes,et al.  Neuroscience-Based Lie Detection: The Urgent Need for Regulation , 2007, American Journal of Law & Medicine.

[54]  J. Lewine,et al.  Objective Documentation of Traumatic Brain Injury Subsequent to Mild Head Trauma: Multimodal Brain Imaging With MEG, SPECT, and MRI , 2007, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[55]  K. Jellinger Law and the Brain , 2007 .

[56]  Adam J Kolber Pain Detection and the Privacy of Subjective Experience , 2007, American Journal of Law & Medicine.

[57]  S. Hyman The Neurobiology of Addiction: Implications for Voluntary Control of Behavior , 2007, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[58]  S. Morse Voluntary Control of Behavior and Responsibility , 2007, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[59]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[60]  D. Kumaran,et al.  Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain , 2006, Science.

[61]  S. Morse Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note , 2006 .

[62]  Adam J Kolber Therapeutic Forgetting: The Legal and Ethical Implications of Memory Dampening , 2006 .

[63]  Kevin A. Johnson,et al.  Detecting Deception Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[64]  H. Greely Premarket Approval Regulation for Lie Detections: An Idea Whose Time May Be Coming , 2005, American Journal of Bioethics.

[65]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[66]  R. Sapolsky The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[67]  Samir Chopra,et al.  Artificial Agents - Personhood in Law and Philosophy , 2004, ECAI.

[68]  Hugo Cesar Hoeschl,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Law , 2004, AIAI.

[69]  D. Schacter,et al.  A sensory signature that distinguishes true from false memories , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[70]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[71]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[72]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children Evidence from fMRI , 2002, Neuron.

[73]  B. Price,et al.  Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behaviour: a critical review , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[74]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[75]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[76]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[77]  Bent Stamnes Texas , 2000, SIGGRAPH '11.

[78]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[79]  M. Bushnell,et al.  Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. , 1997, Science.

[80]  E Donchin,et al.  The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[81]  Lenford C. Sutton Alabama , 1896, The Journal of comparative medicine and veterinary archives.

[82]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It , 2012 .

[83]  H. Walter,et al.  From moral to legal judgment: the influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[84]  Dennis A. Turner,et al.  The development of brain-machine interface neuroprosthetic devices , 2011, Neurotherapeutics.

[85]  Morris B Hoffman Problem-Solving Courts and the Psycholegal Error , 2011 .

[86]  J. Rilling,et al.  The neuroscience of social decision-making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[87]  Francis X. Shen The Law and Neuroscience Bibliography: Navigating the Emerging Field of Neurolaw† , 2010, International Journal of Legal Information.

[88]  H. Greely Law and the Revolution in Neuroscience: An Early Look at the Field , 2009 .

[89]  A. Pustilnik Violence on the Brain: A Critique of Neuroscience in Criminal Law , 2009 .

[90]  D. K. Marcus,et al.  The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses. , 2008, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[91]  J. Grafman,et al.  Opinion: the neural basis of human moral cognition. , 2005, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[92]  Sophie Rovner,et al.  NEUROSCIENCE AND THE LAW: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice , 2005 .

[93]  Zhou Yu,et al.  ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF , 2002 .

[94]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[95]  W. Grove,et al.  Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Psychological assessment.