High‐frequency terrestrial water storage signal capture via a regularized sliding window mascon product from GRACE

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission has provided an unprecedented global, homogeneous observational data set of time variation in terrestrial water storage since 2002. The typical GRACE product uses approximately 30 equally weighted days of data to estimate a monthly mean gravity field with 300+ km resolution. The coarse spatial and temporal resolution of the typical GRACE solution, however, limits scientific analysis to primarily seasonal and long‐term hydrological processes. In this study, we enhance the temporal and spatial resolution of the GRACE data product through the use of sliding windows, regularization, and mascon basis functions in the estimation process. Each regularized sliding window mascon (RSWM) gravity field is composed of 21 days of observational data differentially weighted to optimize the frequency retention while ensuring sufficient observability for a global solution. Tikhonov regularization informed by RL05 error is applied in the estimation process, and the product is derived in mascon basis functions to increase the amplitude and localization of signal retention. The final RSWM data product is the first daily time‐variable gravity data set created solely from GRACE information. The improved filter design reduces aliasing, increases the signal bandwidth, and better captures the amplitude and power of geophysical signals. Comparison with land surface model and in situ data sets shows a similar spatial and temporal signal content at all frequencies within the filter bandwidth and highlights the overall accuracy of the product. The new data set expands opportunities for scientific analysis of subseasonal terrestrial water storage variability.

[1]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[2]  J. B. Thomas.  An Analysis of Gravity-Field Estimation Based on Intersatellite Dual-1-Way Biased Ranging , 1999 .

[3]  P. Döll,et al.  A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation , 2003 .

[4]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system , 2004 .

[5]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[6]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[7]  B. Tapley,et al.  Statistical Orbit Determination , 2004 .

[8]  J. Kusche.  Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE-type gravity field models , 2007 .

[9]  M. Rodell,et al.  Assimilation of GRACE Terrestrial Water Storage Data into a Land Surface Model: Results for the Mississippi River Basin , 2008 .

[10]  K. Lambeck,et al.  GRACE estimates of sea surface height anomalies in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia , 2008 .

[11]  Guillaume Ramillien,et al.  Detection of Continental Hydrology and Glaciology Signals from GRACE: A Review , 2008 .

[12]  S. Petrovic,et al.  Integration of GRACE mass variations into a global hydrological model , 2009 .

[13]  V. M. Tiwari,et al.  Dwindling groundwater resources in northern India, from satellite gravity observations , 2009 .

[14]  H. Save.  Using regularization for error reduction in GRACE gravity estimation , 2009 .

[15]  J. Bonin.  Improving the observation of time-variable gravity using GRACE RL04 data , 2010 .

[16]  S. Bettadpur,et al.  Modeling Earth deformation from monsoonal flooding in Bangladesh using hydrographic, GPS, and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data , 2010 .

[17]  Robert Pincus,et al.  DART/CAM: An Ensemble Data Assimilation System for CESM Atmospheric Models , 2012 .

[18]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  Reducing errors in the GRACE gravity solutions using regularization , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[19]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  Improved daily GRACE gravity field solutions using a Kalman smoother , 2012 .

[20]  Don P. Chambers,et al.  Evaluation of Release-05 GRACE time-variable gravity coefficients over the ocean , 2012 .

[21]  R. Houborg,et al.  Drought indicators based on model‐assimilated Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) terrestrial water storage observations , 2012 .

[22]  Eric Rignot,et al.  A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance , 2012, Science.

[23]  B. Scanlon,et al.  GRACE satellite monitoring of large depletion in water storage in response to the 2011 drought in Texas , 2013 .

[24]  Louise Sandberg Sørensen,et al.  Scatter of mass changes estimates at basin scale for Greenland and Antarctica , 2013 .

[25]  James S. Famiglietti,et al.  Remote Sensing of Terrestrial Water Storage, Soil Moisture and Surface Waters , 2013 .

[26]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  Groundwater depletion during drought threatens future water security of the Colorado River Basin , 2014, Geophysical research letters.

[27]  Yoann Malbéteau,et al.  Surface Freshwater Storage Variations in the Orinoco Floodplains Using Multi-Satellite Observations , 2014, Remote. Sens..