Overdenture retaining bar stress distribution: A finite-element analysis

Abstract Objective. Evaluate the stress distribution on the peri-implant bone tissue and prosthetic components of bar-clip retaining systems for overdentures presenting different implant inclinations, vertical misfit and framework material. Materials and methods. Three-dimensional models of a jaw and an overdenture retained by two implants and a bar-clip attachment were modeled using specific software (SolidWorks 2010). The studied variables were: latero-lateral inclination of one implant (–10°, –5°, 0°, +5°, +10°); vertical misfit on the other implant (50, 100, 200 µm); and framework material (Au type IV, Ag-Pd, Ti cp, Co-Cr). Solid models were imported into mechanical simulation software (ANSYS Workbench 11). All nodes on the bone’s external surface were constrained and a displacement was applied to simulate the settling of the framework on the ill-fitted component. Von Mises stress for the prosthetic components and maximum principal stress to the bone tissue were evaluated. Results. The +10° inclination presented the worst biomechanical behavior, promoting the highest stress values on the bar framework and peri-implant bone tissue. The –5° group presented the lowest stress values on the prosthetic components and the lowest stress value on peri-implant bone tissue was observed in –10°. Increased vertical misfit caused an increase on the stress values in all evaluated structures. Stiffer framework materials caused a considerable stress increase in the framework itself, prosthetic screw of the fitted component and peri-implant bone tissue. Conclusions. Inclination of one implant associated with vertical misfit caused a relevant effect on the stress distribution in bar-clip retained overdentures. Different framework materials promoted increased levels of stress in all the evaluated structures.

[1]  A. Bacchi,et al.  The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures. , 2014, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[2]  M. Pimentel,et al.  Stress analysis of different configurations of 3 implants to support a fixed prosthesis in an edentulous jaw. , 2014, Brazilian oral research.

[3]  R. Consani,et al.  Influence of different soft liners on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during healing period. A 3D finite element analysis. , 2013, The Journal of oral implantology.

[4]  A. Bacchi,et al.  Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis , 2013, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[5]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Effect of bar cross-section geometry on stress distribution in overdenture-retaining system simulating horizontal misfit and bone loss. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  A. Bacchi,et al.  Influence of different mucosal resiliency and denture reline on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during osseointegration. A three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2012, Gerodontology.

[7]  O. Geçkili,et al.  Complication rates and patient satisfaction with removable dentures , 2012, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[8]  J. M. Thomason The use of mandibular implant-retained overdentures improve patient satisfaction and quality of life. , 2012, The journal of evidence-based dental practice.

[9]  R. Consani,et al.  Effects of horizontal misfit and bar framework material on the stress distribution of an overdenture-retaining bar system: a 3D finite element analysis. , 2011, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[10]  L. Marchini,et al.  Patients' expectations before and evaluation after dental implant therapy. , 2011, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[11]  P. Noritomi,et al.  Influence of material of overdenture-retaining bar with vertical misfit on three-dimensional stress distribution. , 2010, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[12]  Karl Lyons,et al.  Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[13]  Jasson Gryzagoridis,et al.  Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  Marco Bevilacqua,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths. , 2008, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[15]  L. Marchini,et al.  General health of elderly institutionalised and community-dwelling Brazilians. , 2007, Gerodontology.

[16]  Arturo N Natali,et al.  Evaluation of stress induced in peri-implant bone tissue by misfit in multi-implant prosthesis. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  P. Petersen,et al.  Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. , 2005, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[18]  P. Trisi,et al.  Bone-to-implant apposition with machined and MTX microtextured implant surfaces in human sinus grafts. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[19]  T D Taylor,et al.  The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  T D Taylor,et al.  The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. , 2002, Gerodontology.

[21]  Lisa A Lang,et al.  Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. , 2002, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[22]  E. Lautenschlager,et al.  Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[23]  C. Peck,et al.  Implant angulation: a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[24]  M. Çehreli,et al.  The Significance Of Passive Framework Fit In Implant Prosthodontics: Current Status , 2001, Implant dentistry.

[25]  D. Cochran,et al.  The scientific basis for and clinical experiences with Straumann implants including the ITI Dental Implant System: a consensus report. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  A. Carr,et al.  Distortion of three-unit implant frameworks during casting, soldering, and simulated porcelain firings. , 1999, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[27]  V. Petropoulos,et al.  Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  E A Patterson,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[29]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.