Accounting Students’ Perceptions of a Learning Management System: An International Comparison

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to investigate student perceptions of the design features included in an off the shelf Learning Management System (LMS) in teaching undergraduate accounting students. Design/methodology/approach - Questionnaire responses from 846 accounting students studying in the UK, Australia and New Zealand provide international data to develop a model to explain student perception of the LMS. Findings - The final model shows student satisfaction with the use of a LMS is positively associated with three variables: usefulness of lecture notes, bulletin boards and discussion forums, and other LMS tools. Further, the comparison of cultural differences of the three countries shows all students treat the provision of notes as a desirable attribute on a LMS. Findings also suggest that although students find the provision of materials over the LMS does not enhance student engagement in class, overall a comparison of the three countries shows all students treat the provision of notes as a desirable attribute of a LMS. Research limitations/implications - Future research should collect ethnicity data to enable an analysis of cultural influence on student perceptions of the LMS. Practical implications - As increased motivation to learn is found to contribute to improved achievement of learning outcomes, the study's findings have implications for faculty contemplating the adoption of a LMS in their courses. The findings specifically confirm that usefulness of lecture notes, use of bulletin/discussion boards, and other LMS tools are positively endorsed by students and hence increase their motivation to learn. Originality/value - The current paper adds to the literature as the motivation to use and engage with LMSs by accounting students is not well understood.

[1]  Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis,et al.  The SOLO Taxonomy as a means of shaping and assessing learning in higher education , 1995 .

[2]  Paul Chang,et al.  Teaching and learning online for the first time: Student and coordinator perspectives , 2003 .

[3]  Ferdinand A. Gul,et al.  Predicting success for introductory accounting students: some further Hong Kong evidence , 1993 .

[4]  R. Kozma.  Learning with Media , 1991 .

[5]  David Kember,et al.  Open Learning Courses for Adults: A Model of Student Progress , 1995 .

[6]  Jim Prentzas,et al.  Adult Distance Learning Using a Web-Based Learning Management System: Methodology and Results , 2007, ICWL.

[7]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature , 2000 .

[8]  J. Keller.  Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn , 1987 .

[9]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Alternative instructional strategies for creative and critical thinking in the accounting curriculum , 1998 .

[10]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Virtual Learning Environments , 2020, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education.

[11]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[12]  Gordon Boyce,et al.  Computer-assisted teaching and learning in accounting: pedagogy or product? , 1999 .

[13]  Kamal S. Ali,et al.  The Internet as an educational tool , 1996 .

[14]  P. Booth,et al.  The quality of learning in accounting education: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance , 1999 .

[15]  Markus J. Milne,et al.  Identifying and overcoming obstacles to learner-centred approaches in tertiary accounting education: a field study and survey of accounting educators' perceptions , 2000 .

[16]  J. Arbaugh,et al.  Technological and Structural Characteristics, Student Learning and Satisfaction with Web-Based Courses , 2002 .

[17]  A Fransson,et al.  On qualitative differences in learning: IV -- effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. , 1977, The British journal of educational psychology.

[18]  Henry William Rawson Wade.  What Do Students Know and How Do We Know That They Know It , 1999 .

[19]  Themin Suwardy,et al.  Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: determinants of student motivation , 2003 .

[20]  Scott B. Follows.  Virtual Learning Environments. , 1999 .

[21]  Paul K. Wells,et al.  Integrating a Virtual Learning Environment into a Second-Year Accounting Course: Determinants of Overall Student Perception , 2008 .

[22]  James E. Hunton,et al.  The Use of Technology in the Delivery of Instruction: Implications for Accounting Educators and Education Researchers , 2000 .

[23]  Nia Love,et al.  Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net? , 2006 .

[24]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[25]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  An analysis of the use of virtual delivery of undergraduate lectures , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Lawrence A. Beard,et al.  Student Perceptions of Online versus on Campus Instruction , 2002 .

[27]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[28]  Hian Chye Koh,et al.  The determinants of performance in an accountancy degree programme , 1999 .

[29]  Themin Suwardy,et al.  Delivery of Accounting Subjects via the Internet: Student Perceptions , 1998 .

[30]  Jane Seale,et al.  An introduction to learning technology in tertiary education in the UK. , 2001 .

[31]  John O'Malley,et al.  Students Perceptions of Distance Learning, Online Learning and the Traditional Classroom , 1999 .

[32]  Shumin Kang.  Toward a Collaborative Model for the Design of Web-based Courses. , 2001 .

[33]  Sarah E. Bonner.  Choosing Teaching Methods Based on Learning Objectives: An Integrative Framework , 1999 .

[34]  J. Brace-Govan,et al.  Varying expectations of online students and the implications for teachers: Findings from a journal study , 2000 .

[35]  Caroline Ramsey,et al.  Using Virtual Learning Environments to Facilitate New Learning Relationships , 2003 .