Retinal Axon Response to Ephrin-As Shows a Graded, Concentration-Dependent Transition from Growth Promotion to Inhibition

Ephrin-As act as retinal topographic mapping labels, but the molecular basis for two key aspects of mapping remains unclear. First, although mapping is believed to require balanced opposing forces, ephrin-As have been reported to be retinal axon repellents, and the counterbalanced force has not been molecularly identified. Second, although graded responsiveness across the retina is required for smooth mapping, a sharp discontinuity has instead been reported. Here, an axon growth assay was developed to systematically vary both retinal position and ephrin concentration and test responses quantitatively. Responses varied continuously with retinal position, fulfilling the requirement for smooth mapping. Ephrin-A2 inhibited growth at high concentrations but promoted growth at lower concentrations. Moreover, the concentration producing a transition from promotion to inhibition varied topographically with retinal position. These results lead directly to a mapping model where position within a concentration gradient may be specified at the neutral point between growth promotion and inhibition.

[1]  J G Flanagan,et al.  The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  Matthias Mann,et al.  RGM is a repulsive guidance molecule for retinal axons , 2002, Nature.

[3]  A. Lane,et al.  Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses. , 1998, Genes & development.

[4]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographic Guidance Labels in a Sensory Projection to the Forebrain , 1998, Neuron.

[5]  R. Sperry CHEMOAFFINITY IN THE ORDERLY GROWTH OF NERVE FIBER PATTERNS AND CONNECTIONS. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  F. Bonhoeffer,et al.  On the turning of Xenopus retinal axons induced by ephrin-A5 , 2003, Development.

[7]  J. Frisén,et al.  Ephrins are not only unattractive , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  Geoffrey J. Goodhill,et al.  Retinotectal maps: molecules, models and misplaced data , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  John G. Flanagan,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Ephrin-A2 and Ephrin-A5 Shows Their Requirement in Multiple Aspects of Retinocollicular Mapping , 2000, Neuron.

[10]  Jonas Frisén,et al.  Ephrin-A5 (AL-1/RAGS) Is Essential for Proper Retinal Axon Guidance and Topographic Mapping in the Mammalian Visual System , 1998, Neuron.

[11]  R. Klein,et al.  Excitatory Eph receptors and adhesive ephrin ligands. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[12]  A Gierer,et al.  Model for the retino-tectal projection , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  J Walter,et al.  Recognition of position-specific properties of tectal cell membranes by retinal axons in vitro. , 1987, Development.

[14]  C. Nobes,et al.  Rac-dependent trans-endocytosis of ephrinBs regulates Eph–ephrin contact repulsion , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Loss-of-Function Analysis of EphA Receptors in Retinotectal Mapping , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Arber,et al.  Repulsive Guidance Molecule (RGM) Gene Function Is Required for Neural Tube Closure But Not Retinal Topography in the Mouse Visual System , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographically Specific Effects of ELF-1 on Retinal Axon Guidance In Vitro and Retinal Axon Mapping In Vivo , 1996, Cell.

[18]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map , 1995, Cell.

[19]  C. Holt,et al.  Topographic Mapping in Dorsoventral Axis of the Xenopus Retinotectal System Depends on Signaling through Ephrin-B Ligands , 2002, Neuron.

[20]  J Huf,et al.  Response of retinal ganglion cell axons to striped linear gradients of repellent guidance molecules. , 1998, Journal of neurobiology.

[21]  S. Thanos,et al.  Outgrowth and directional specificity of fibers from embryonic retinal transplants in the chick optic tectum. , 1987, Brain research.

[22]  H. Baier,et al.  Axon guidance by gradients of a target-derived component. , 1992, Science.

[23]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Bifunctional action of ephrin-B1 as a repellent and attractant to control bidirectional branch extension in dorsal-ventral retinotopic mapping , 2003, Development.

[24]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphA-ephrinA gradients, axon-axon interactions, and patterned activity. , 2004, Journal of neurobiology.

[25]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Detection of Ligands in Regions Anatomically Connected to Neurons Expressing the Eph Receptor Bsk: Potential Roles in Neuron–Target Interaction , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Cerretti,et al.  Ephrin-dependent growth and pruning of hippocampal axons. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J. Frisén,et al.  Regulation of repulsion versus adhesion by different splice forms of an Eph receptor , 2000, Nature.

[28]  D. O'Leary,et al.  EphB Forward Signaling Controls Directional Branch Extension and Arborization Required for Dorsal-Ventral Retinotopic Mapping , 2002, Neuron.

[29]  Cori Bargmann,et al.  Dynamic regulation of axon guidance , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  David G. Wilkinson,et al.  Multiple roles of eph receptors and ephrins in neural development , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  F. Hefti,et al.  Cloning of AL-1, a ligand for an Eph-related tyrosine kinase receptor involved in axon bundle formation , 1995, Neuron.

[32]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Graded and lamina-specific distributions of ligands of EphB receptor tyrosine kinases in the developing retinotectal system. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[33]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Graded Positional Information Interpretation for Both Fate and Guidance , 2003, Cell.

[34]  H Honda,et al.  Topographic mapping in the retinotectal projection by means of complementary ligand and receptor gradients: a computer simulation study. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF‐1 in guiding retinal axons , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[36]  J G Flanagan,et al.  Regulated cleavage of a contact-mediated axon repellent. , 2000, Science.

[37]  D. Willshaw,et al.  On a role for competition in the formation of patterned neural connexions , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[38]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Topographic Mapping from the Retina to the Midbrain Is Controlled by Relative but Not Absolute Levels of EphA Receptor Signaling , 2000, Cell.

[39]  Scott E. Fraser,et al.  Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on optic axon branching and remodelling in vivo , 1995, Nature.

[40]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases , 1995, Cell.