Sexual dimorphism matches photoreceptor performance to behavioural requirements

Differences in behaviour exist between the sexes of most animal species and are associated with many sex–specific specializations. The visual system of the male housefly is known to be specialized for pursuit behaviour that culminates in mating. Males chase females using a high–acuity region of the fronto–dorsal retina (the ‘love spot’) that drives sex–specific neural circuitry. We show that love spot photoreceptors of the housefly combine better spatial resolution with a faster electrical response, thereby allowing them to code higher velocities and smaller targets than female photoreceptors. Love spot photoreceptors of males are more than 60% faster than their female counterparts and are among the fastest recorded for any animal. The superior response dynamics of male photoreceptors is achieved by a speeding up of the biochemical processes involved in phototransduction and by a tuned voltage–activated conductance that boosts the membrane frequency response. These results demonstrate that the inherent plasticity of phototransduction facilitates the tuning of the dynamics of visual processing to the requirements of visual ecology.

[1]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of motion detectors matched to low image velocities in hovering insects , 1997, Vision Research.

[2]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Insect motion detectors matched to visual ecology , 1996, Nature.

[3]  H. Wagner Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domestica L.) II. Pursuit of targets , 1986 .

[4]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Photoreceptor performance and the co-ordination of achromatic and chromatic inputs in the fly visual system , 2000, Vision Research.

[5]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  The Resolution of Lens and Compound Eyes , 1976 .

[6]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[7]  Roger C. Hardie,et al.  Whole-cell recordings of the light induced current in dissociated Drosophila photoreceptors: evidence for feedback by calcium permeating the light-sensitive channels , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Barbara Blakeslee,et al.  The intracellular pupil mechanism and photoreceptor signal: noise ratios in the fly Lucilia cuprina , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  S B Laughlin,et al.  Matched filtering by a photoreceptor membrane , 1996, Vision Research.

[10]  J. Eilbeck,et al.  Membrane conductances involved in amplification of small signals by sodium channels in photoreceptors of drone honey bee. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  R. Hardie Functional Organization of the Fly Retina , 1985 .

[12]  Hansjochem Autrum,et al.  Comparative Physiology of Invertebrates: Hearing and Vision , 1984 .

[13]  Rob R. de Ruyter van Steveninck,et al.  The metabolic cost of neural information , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Laughlin,et al.  The rate of information transfer at graded-potential synapses , 1996, Nature.

[15]  S B Laughlin,et al.  Voltage‐activated potassium channels in blowfly photoreceptors and their role in light adaptation. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  D. Stavenga Eye regionalization and spectral tuning of retinal pigments in insects , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  Michael F. Land,et al.  Optics and Vision in Invertebrates , 1981 .

[18]  C. Zuker,et al.  Signal transduction in Drosophila photoreceptors. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  S. Laughlin Neural Principles in the Peripheral Visual Systems of Invertebrates , 1981 .

[20]  S. Laughlin A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[21]  N. Franceschini,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in a photoreceptor , 1981, Nature.

[22]  Nicholas J. Strausfeld,et al.  Sexually dimorphic interneuron arrangements in the fly visual system , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  D. Stavenga,et al.  Functional morphology of the divided compound eye of the honeybee drone (Apis mellifera). , 1991, Tissue & cell.