Capacity of large-scale, long-term biodiversity monitoring programmes to detect trends in species prevalence

There is a critical need for monitoring programmes to assess change or trends in species status to inform conservation. A key aspect in developing such programmes is evaluating their statistical power—the ability to detect a real change. Here we examine the capacity of a broad-scale biodiversity monitoring programme in Alberta, Canada to measure changes in species prevalence. Using observed variation in detectability and prevalence for 252 species monitored at 85 sites, we simulated 3% annual declines and evaluated sample size (6 different sizes) and length of monitoring (5 different durations) necessary to detect change with a 90% certainty (power) at an α of 0.1. Our results suggest that after four monitoring cycles (e.g., 20 years for a 5-year cycle) a power of 90% can be expected for 99% of species when monitoring 1,625 sites, 65% of species for 300 sites, 27% of species for 75 sites, and 8% of species for 25 sites. We found that 66% detectability and 50% prevalence were needed to ensure that 3% annual change is detected at 50 sites over a 20-year period. Our results demonstrate that broad-scale monitoring programmes cannot effectively detect trends in all species at all spatial scales. The time period and spatial scale necessary to detect a real change at a specified level needs to be provided to stakeholders to ensure the short-term success of biodiversity monitoring programmes and to ensure that the most robust indicators of biodiversity are selected.

[1]  William J. Zielinski,et al.  EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐SPECIES APPROACH TO MONITORING SPECIES AT THE ECOREGIONAL SCALE , 2004 .

[2]  G. Mace,et al.  Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  J. Karr,et al.  Restoring life in running waters : better biological monitoring , 1998 .

[4]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[5]  Queensland Townsville.  Observer effects and training in underwater visual surveys of reef fishes , 1997 .

[6]  David M Marsh,et al.  Current Trends in Plant and Animal Population Monitoring , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Integrating ongoing biodiversity monitoring: potential benefits and methods , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[8]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[9]  Pierre-Yves Henry,et al.  A review and a framework for the integration of biodiversity monitoring at the habitat level , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[10]  J. Lawton,et al.  Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies , 1993, Nature.

[11]  K. Gaston,et al.  Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Tim Gerrodette,et al.  The Uses of Statistical Power in Conservation Biology: The Vaquita and Northern Spotted Owl , 1993 .

[13]  D. Moss,et al.  The statistical power of two butterfly monitoring schemes to detect trends , 1997 .

[14]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The Focal‐Species Approach and Landscape Restoration: a Critique , 2002 .

[15]  A. Purvis,et al.  Getting the measure of biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[16]  B. Mapstone.  Scalable Decision Rules for Environmental Impact Studies: Effect Size, Type I, and Type II Errors , 1995 .

[17]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  ASSESSING RARITY OF SPECIES WITH LOW DETECTABILITY: LICHENS IN PACIFIC NORTHWEST FORESTS , 2004 .

[18]  Data quality in monitoring plant species richness in Switzerland , 2004 .

[19]  F. Archaux,et al.  Optimising vegetation monitoring. A case study in A French lowland forest , 2008, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[20]  Pierre-Yves Henry,et al.  Habitat monitoring in Europe: a description of current practices , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[21]  P. Drapeau,et al.  Refining the use of point counts at the scale of individual points in studies of bird-habitat relationships , 1999 .

[22]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Development of a large area biodiversity monitoring system driven by remote sensing , 2007 .

[23]  D. MacKenzie.  Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[24]  S. Menard.  Coefficients of Determination for Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis , 2000 .

[25]  J. Nichols,et al.  IMPROVING INFERENCES IN POPULATION STUDIES OF RARE SPECIES THAT ARE DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2005 .

[26]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Minimizing the cost of environmental management decisions by optimizing statistical thresholds , 2004 .

[27]  P. Manley,et al.  A FIELD-BASED EVALUATION OF A PRESENCE–ABSENCE PROTOCOL FOR MONITORING ECOREGIONAL-SCALE BIODIVERSITY , 2005 .

[28]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  D. Simberloff.  Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? , 1998 .

[30]  Katherine A. Eschelbach,et al.  Recommendations for Assessing the Effectiveness of Surrogate Species Approaches , 2006, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[31]  James W. Haefner,et al.  Modeling Biological Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[32]  C. Allen,et al.  Observer Bias in Anuran Call Surveys , 2007 .

[33]  Jim Schieck,et al.  Indices for monitoring biodiversity change: Are some more effective than others? , 2009 .

[34]  D. R. Fox,et al.  Environmental power analysis – a new perspective , 2001 .

[35]  Geir-Harald Strand,et al.  Detection of observer bias in ongoing forest health monitoring programmes , 1996 .

[36]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Mammal Population Losses and the Extinction Crisis , 2002, Science.

[37]  J. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring for conservation. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  Peter Rothery,et al.  Reduced‐effort schemes for monitoring butterfly populations , 2007 .

[39]  B. McCune,et al.  Repeatability of Community Data: Species Richness Versus Gradient Scores in Large-scale Lichen Studies , 1997 .

[40]  R. Clarke,et al.  Effects of locally rare taxa on the precision and sensitivity of RIVPACS bioassessment of freshwaters , 2006 .

[41]  Jim Schieck,et al.  Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Program – Monitoring Effectiveness of Sustainable Forest Management Planning , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[42]  E. Bayne,et al.  A new method to estimate species and biodiversity intactness using empirically derived reference conditions , 2007 .

[43]  Monitoring ecological representation in currently non-harvestable areas: Four British Columbia case studies , 2006 .

[44]  Laszlo Nagy,et al.  Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[45]  Peter G. Fairweather,et al.  Statistical Power and Design Requirements for Environmental Monitoring , 1991 .

[46]  N. S. Urquhart,et al.  Designs for Detecting Trend From Repeated Surveys of Ecological Resources , 1999 .