The relevance of Simpson Grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I meningiomas.

OBJECT In 1957, Simpson published a seminal paper defining the risk factors for recurrence following surgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas. Given that Simpson's study was published more than 50 years ago, preceding image guidance technology and MR imaging, the authors reviewed their own experience with surgical treatment of Grade I meningiomas to determine if Simpson's grading scale is still relevant to modern neurosurgical practice. METHODS From this cohort, the authors evaluated all patients undergoing craniotomy for resection of a histologically proven WHO Grade I meningioma as their initial therapy. Clinical information was retrospectively reconstructed using patient medical records and radiological data. Recurrence analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The 5-year recurrence/progression-free survival for all patients receiving a Simpson Grade I, II, III, or IV resection was 95, 85, 88, and 81%, respectively (p = not significant, log-rank test). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in recurrence-free survival between patients receiving a Simpson Grade I, II, III, or IV resection. Analysis limited to meningiomas arising from the skull base (excluding the cavernous sinus) similarly found no significant benefit to Simpson Grade I or II resection, and the survival curves were nearly superimposed. CONCLUSIONS In this study of a cohort of patients undergoing surgery for WHO Grade I meningiomas, the authors demonstrate that the benefit of more aggressive attempts to resect the tumor with dura and underlying bone was negligible compared with simply removing the entire tumor, or even leaving small amounts of tumor attached to critical structures. The authors believe that these data reflect an evolution in the nature of meningioma surgery over the past 2 decades, and bring into question the relevance of using Simpson's grading system as the sole predictor of recurrence.

[1]  M. Berger,et al.  Risk profile associated with convexity meningioma resection in the modern neurosurgical era. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  T. Kawase,et al.  ABC Surgical Risk Scale for skull base meningioma: a new scoring system for predicting the extent of tumor removal and neurological outcome , 2009 .

[3]  A. Sav,et al.  Immunohistochemical expression of SPARC is correlated with recurrence, survival and malignant potential in meningiomas , 2009, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[4]  G. Barnett,et al.  Long-term experience with World Health Organization grade III (malignant) meningiomas at a single institution. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  H. Mehdorn,et al.  Recurrence of intracranial meningiomas: did better methods of diagnosis and surgical treatment change the outcome in the last 30 years? , 2009, Neurological research.

[6]  P. Black,et al.  Surgery for extra-axial tumors of the cerebral convexity and midline. , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[7]  中根 幸実 Malignant transformation-related genes in meningiomas : allelic loss on 1p36 and methylation status of p73 and RASSF1A , 2008 .

[8]  M. del Basso de Caro,et al.  Local versus diffuse recurrences of meningiomas: factors correlated to the extent of the recurrence. , 2008, Clinical neuropathology.

[9]  Feng Li,et al.  Malignant meningiomas: a retrospective study of 22 cases. , 2007, Bulletin du cancer.

[10]  D. Macarthur,et al.  Atypical meningiomas: WHO moved the goalposts? , 2007, British journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  E. R. Orlando,et al.  Meningiomas infiltrating the superior sagittal sinus: surgical considerations of 328 cases , 2006, Neurosurgical Review.

[12]  J. Meixensberger,et al.  Factors influencing meningioma recurrence rate , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[13]  O. Al-Mefty,et al.  Recurrence of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[14]  L Dade Lunsford,et al.  Gamma knife radiosurgery of imaging-diagnosed intracranial meningioma. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  C. Giannini,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery provides equivalent tumor control to Simpson Grade 1 resection for patients with small- to medium-size meningiomas. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Charles B. Wilson,et al.  Delayed Surgical Resection Reduces Intraoperative Blood Loss for Embolized Meningiomas , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[17]  C. Rosen,et al.  Proposed grading system to predict the extent of resection and outcomes for cranial base meningiomas. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[18]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Long-term outcomes after meningioma radiosurgery: physician and patient perspectives. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Primarily resected meningiomas: outcome and prognostic factors in 581 Mayo Clinic patients, 1978 through 1988. , 1998, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[20]  W. Friedman Judicious Resection and/or Radiosurgery for Parasagittal Meningiomas: Outcomes from a Multicenter Review , 1998 .

[21]  M. Pritz,et al.  Neurosarcoidosis Resembling Meningioma: MRI Characteristics and Pathologic Correlation , 1998, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[22]  C. Lindquist,et al.  Recurrence of cranial base meningiomas. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[23]  J. Jääskeläinen,et al.  Seemingly complete removal of histologically benign intracranial meningioma: late recurrence rate and factors predicting recurrence in 657 patients. A multivariate analysis. , 1986, Surgical neurology.

[24]  R. Martuza,et al.  Meningioma: analysis of recurrence and progression following neurosurgical resection. , 1985, Journal of neurosurgery.

[25]  M. Khan,et al.  The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.