Identifying Damage Location under Statistical Pattern Recognition by New Feature Extraction and Feature Analysis Methods

The main objective of this article is to identify the location of damage by a new feature extraction technique and propose some efficient feature analysis tools as statistical distance measures. The proposed algorithm of feature extraction relies on a combination of the well-known Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a convolution strategy. After extracting the features from raw vibration signals of undamaged and damaged conditions, those are applied to the proposed feature analysis approaches called coefficient of variation, Fisher criterion, Fano factor, and relative reliability index, all of which are formulated by using statistical moments of the features extracted from the PCA-convolution algorithm. To localize damage, the sensor location with the distance value exceeded from a threshold limit is identified as the damaged area. The main innovations of this research are to present a new hybrid technique of feature extraction suitable for SHM applications and four effective statistical measures for feature analysis and damage identification. The performance and reliability of the proposed methods are verified by a four-story shear-building model and a benchmark concrete beam. Results demonstrate that the approaches presented here can influentially identify the location of damage by using the features extracted from the proposed PCA-convolution algorithm.

[1]  Charles M. Rader,et al.  Discrete Convolutions via Mersenne Transrorms , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[2]  C. Sidney Burrus,et al.  Fast convolution and filtering , 1997 .

[3]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective , 2012 .

[4]  Jyrki Kullaa,et al.  Vibration-Based Structural Health Monitoring of a Simulated Beam with a Breathing Crack , 2013 .

[5]  Hong Hao,et al.  Integrated ARMA model method for damage detection of subsea pipeline system , 2013 .

[6]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Damage classification in structural health monitoring using principal component analysis and self‐organizing maps , 2013 .

[7]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Recent advances in health monitoring of civil structures , 2014 .

[8]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Stationary and non-stationary random vibration modelling and analysis for an operating wind turbine , 2014 .

[9]  J. P. Amezquita-Sanchez,et al.  Feature extraction and classication techniques for health monitoring of structures , 2015 .

[10]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Signal Processing Techniques for Vibration-Based Health Monitoring of Smart Structures , 2016 .

[11]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Improved damage detectability in a wind turbine blade by optimal selection of vibration signal correlation coefficients , 2016 .

[12]  Abbas Karamodin,et al.  A new iterative model updating technique based on least squares minimal residual method using measured modal data , 2016 .

[13]  Martin Valtierra-Rodriguez,et al.  Neurocomputing in Civil Infrastructure , 2016 .

[14]  G. Ghodrati Amiri,et al.  MODAL DATA BASED APPROACH FOR STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION BY MEANS OF IMPERIALIST COMPETITIVE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM , 2017 .

[15]  K. Rezvani,et al.  A Comparison of Some Methods for Structural Damage Detection , 2017 .

[16]  Abdolreza Joghataie,et al.  Structural damage detection using time domain responses and teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm , 2017 .

[17]  Mehrisadat Makki Alamdari,et al.  A spectral-based clustering for structural health monitoring of the Sydney Harbour Bridge , 2017 .

[18]  Mohd Shahir Liew,et al.  Damage detection in frame structures using noisy accelerometers and Damage Load Vectors (DLV) , 2018 .

[19]  Martin Valtierra-Rodriguez,et al.  Wireless smart sensors for monitoring the health condition of civil infrastructure , 2018 .

[20]  Qipei Mei,et al.  A crowdsourcing-based methodology using smartphones for bridge health monitoring , 2018, Structural Health Monitoring.

[21]  Yun-Lai Zhou,et al.  Damage detection using transmissibility compressed by principal component analysis enhanced with distance measure , 2018 .

[22]  Claudomiro Sales,et al.  Deep principal component analysis: An enhanced approach for structural damage identification , 2018, Structural Health Monitoring.

[23]  Wael A. Altabey,et al.  A Modified Wavelet Energy Rate Based Damage Identification Method for Steel Bridges , 2018, Scientia Iranica.

[24]  Hassan Sarmadi,et al.  Energy-based damage localization under ambient vibration and non-stationary signals by ensemble empirical mode decomposition and Mahalanobis-squared distance , 2019 .

[25]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  Fast unsupervised learning methods for structural health monitoring with large vibration data from dense sensor networks , 2019, Structural Health Monitoring.

[26]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  Damage localization under ambient excitations and non-stationary vibration signals by a new hybrid algorithm for feature extraction and multivariate distance correlation methods , 2019 .

[27]  Saeed Nozhati,et al.  Online nonlinear structural damage detection using Hilbert Huang transform and artificial neural networks , 2019 .

[28]  Xenofon Koutsoukos,et al.  Machine learning based novelty detection using modal analysis , 2019, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[29]  A. Entezami,et al.  Improving feature extraction via time series modeling for structural health monitoring based on unsupervised learning methods , 2020 .

[30]  H. Adeli,et al.  Machine learning in structural engineering , 2020 .

[31]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  Early damage assessment in large-scale structures by innovative statistical pattern recognition methods based on time series modeling and novelty detection , 2020, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[32]  Xianguang Kong,et al.  An adaptive grinding chatter detection method considering the chatter frequency shift characteristic , 2020 .

[33]  Alireza Entezami,et al.  Ensemble learning‐based structural health monitoring by Mahalanobis distance metrics , 2020, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[34]  Hassan Sarmadi,et al.  Application of supervised learning to validation of damage detection , 2020 .

[35]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  Condition Assessment of Civil Structures for Structural Health Monitoring Using Supervised Learning Classification Methods , 2020 .

[36]  Alireza Entezami,et al.  An Unsupervised Learning Approach for Early Damage Detection by Time Series Analysis and Deep Neural Network to Deal with Output-Only (Big) Data , 2020, Proceedings of 7th International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications.

[37]  Stefano Mariani,et al.  Big Data Analytics and Structural Health Monitoring: A Statistical Pattern Recognition-Based Approach , 2020, Sensors.

[38]  Alireza Entezami,et al.  On model-based damage detection by an enhanced sensitivity function of modal flexibility and LSMR-Tikhonov method under incomplete noisy modal data , 2020, Engineering with Computers.

[39]  Alireza Entezami,et al.  A sensitivity‐based finite element model updating based on unconstrained optimization problem and regularized solution methods , 2020, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[40]  Alireza Entezami,et al.  An innovative hybrid strategy for structural health monitoring by modal flexibility and clustering methods , 2020, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring.

[41]  Abbas Karamodin,et al.  A novel anomaly detection method based on adaptive Mahalanobis-squared distance and one-class kNN rule for structural health monitoring under environmental effects , 2020 .

[42]  Ali Nadir Arslan,et al.  A novel data-driven method for structural health monitoring under ambient vibration and high-dimensional features by robust multidimensional scaling , 2021, Structural Health Monitoring.

[43]  Alireza Entezami,et al.  A hybrid sensitivity function and Lanczos bidiagonalization-Tikhonov method for structural model updating: Application to a full-scale bridge structure , 2021 .

[44]  Hassan Sarmadi,et al.  Bridge health monitoring in environmental variability by new clustering and threshold estimation methods , 2021, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring.

[45]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Early damage detection by an innovative unsupervised learning method based on kernel null space and peak‐over‐threshold , 2021, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[46]  S. A. Zareei,et al.  Structural health monitoring using high-dimensional features from time series modeling by innovative hybrid distance-based methods , 2021 .

[47]  Yong Xia,et al.  Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019 , 2021 .

[48]  Stefano Mariani,et al.  Health Monitoring of Large-Scale Civil Structures: An Approach Based on Data Partitioning and Classical Multidimensional Scaling , 2021, Sensors.