Land-use changes, farm management and the decline of butterflies associated with semi-natural grasslands in southern Sweden

Currently, we are experiencing biodiversity loss on different spatial scales. One of the best studied taxonomic groups in decline is the butterflies. Here, we review evidence for such declines using five systematic studies from southern Sweden that compare old butterfly surveys with the current situation. Additionally, we provide data on butterfly and burnet moth extinctions in the region’s counties. In some local areas, half of the butterfly fauna has been lost during the last 60-100 years. In terms of extinctions, counties have lost 2-10 butterfly and burnet moth species. Land use has changed markedly with key butterfly habitats such as hay meadows disappearing at alarming rates. Grazed, mixed open woodlands have been transformed into dense coniferous forests and clear-cuts and domestic grazers have been relocated from woodlands to arable fields and semi-natural grasslands. Ley has increased rapidly and is used for bale silage repeatedly during the season. Overall, the changed and intensified land use has markedly reduced the availability of nectar resources in the landscape. Species that decline in Sweden are strongly decreasing or already extinct in other parts of Europe. Many typical grassland species that were numerous in former times have declined severely; among those Hesperia comma, Lycaena virgaureae, Lycaena hippothoe, Argynnis adippe, and Polyommatus semiargus. Also, species associated with open woodlands and wetlands such as, Colias palaeno, Boloria euphrosyne and the glade-inhabiting Leptidea sinapis have all decreased markedly. Current management practise and EU Common Agricultural Policy rules favour intensive grazing on the remaining semi-natural grasslands, with strong negative effects on butterfly diversity. Abandoned grasslands are very common in less productive areas of southern Sweden and these habitats may soon become forests. There is an urgent need for immediate action to preserve unfertilized, mown and lightly grazed grasslands. It is also crucial to encourage that management of abandoned grasslands resumes before it is too late. In order to mitigate risks of further species loss and to work towards recovery of threatened butterfly populations using best known practises, we recommend twelve types of management measures favourable for many butterflies. (Less)

[1]  N. Ryrholm,et al.  With that diet, you will go far: trait-based analysis reveals a link between rapid range expansion and a nitrogen-favoured diet , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  M. WallisDeVries,et al.  Impact of grazing management on hibernating caterpillars of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia in calcareous grasslands , 2012, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[3]  J. Settele,et al.  Dos and Don’ts for butterflies of the Habitats Directive of the European Union , 2012 .

[4]  Warren,et al.  The State of the UK's Butterflies 2011 , 2011 .

[5]  T. Hyvönen,et al.  Differential responses of bumblebees and diurnal Lepidoptera to vegetation succession in long‐term set‐aside , 2011 .

[6]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  S. Collins,et al.  Grassland butterflies and low intensity farming in Europe , 2011, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[8]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Developing European conservation and mitigation tools for pollination services: approaches of the STEP (Status and Trends of European Pollinators) project , 2011 .

[9]  R. Dennis A Resource-Based Habitat View for Conservation: Butterflies in the British Landscape , 2010 .

[10]  H. Van Dyck,et al.  Declines in Common, Widespread Butterflies in a Landscape under Intense Human Use , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  R. Clarke,et al.  Successful Conservation of a Threatened Maculinea Butterfly , 2009, Science.

[12]  M. Luoto,et al.  Species traits explain recent range shifts of Finnish butterflies , 2009 .

[13]  S. Nilsson,et al.  How can we preserve and restore species richness of pollinating insects on agricultural land , 2008 .

[14]  E J Milner-Gulland,et al.  Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN's System for Classifying Threatened Species , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Long‐term land‐use changes and extinction of specialised butterflies , 2008 .

[16]  M. Konvička,et al.  How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold , 2008, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[17]  J. Wissman,et al.  Biodiversity and Traditional Land Use in South-Central Sweden: The Significance of Management Timing , 2008 .

[18]  Tomas Pärt,et al.  Linking agricultural policies to population trends of Swedish farmland birds in different agricultural regions , 2007 .

[19]  J. Settele,et al.  Effects of management cessation on grassland butterflies in southern Poland , 2007 .

[20]  M. Franzén,et al.  Predicting extinction risk of butterflies and moths (Macrolepidoptera) from distribution patterns and species characteristics , 2007, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[21]  Kimmo Saarinen,et al.  Contrasting trends of butterfly species preferring semi-natural grasslands, field margins and forest edges in northern Europe , 2007, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[22]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants , 2006 .

[23]  Chris van Swaay,et al.  Biotope Use and Trends of European Butterflies , 2006, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[24]  Matthias Weitzel,et al.  The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcareous grasslands during the last 30 years: A conservation problem , 2006 .

[25]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  The relationship between local extinctions of grassland butterflies and increased soil nitrogen levels , 2006 .

[26]  F. Herzog,et al.  Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[27]  Carsten Thies,et al.  REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management , 2005 .

[28]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection , 2004 .

[29]  Mikko Kuussaari,et al.  RESTORATION OF BUTTERFLY AND MOTH COMMUNITIES IN SEMI-NATURAL GRASSLANDS BY CATTLE GRAZING , 2004 .

[30]  M. Franzén,et al.  Occurrence patterns of butterflies (Rhopalocera) in semi-natural pastures in southeastern Sweden , 2004 .

[31]  M. Franzén,et al.  Habitat associations and occupancy patterns of burnet moths (Zygaenidae) in semi-natural pastures in Sweden , 2004 .

[32]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The need for evidence-based conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? , 2003 .

[34]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Land-use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia , 2002 .

[35]  B. Söderström,et al.  Species‐Richness Correlations of Six Different Taxa in Swedish Seminatural Grasslands , 2002 .

[36]  Birgitta Svensson,et al.  Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors , 2001, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[37]  J. K. Hill,et al.  Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change , 2001, Nature.

[38]  Jan G. M. Roelofs,et al.  The effects of air‐borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi‐natural European vegetation , 1998 .

[39]  A. Erhardt Diurnal Lepidoptera: sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned Grassland , 1985 .

[40]  B. Fontaine,et al.  The European Grassland Butterfly Indicator: 1990–2011 , 2013 .

[41]  T. Brereton,et al.  The state of the UK's butterflies , 2012 .

[42]  L. Pettersson,et al.  Swedish Butterfly Monitoring Scheme, annual report for 2014 , 2011 .

[43]  J. Settele,et al.  Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: How red is the Red List of European butterflies? , 2011 .

[44]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  Effect of field margins on moths depends on species mobility: Field-based evidence for landscape-scale conservation , 2009 .

[45]  S. Nilsson Utmarksskogen förr i tiden - uppgifter från Linnés hembygd , 2006 .

[46]  Chris van Swaay,et al.  Biotope use and trends of European butterflies , 2006, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[47]  S. Nilsson The changing structure and tree composition in the traditionally grazed forests in the parish of Stenbrohult, southern Sweden , 2006 .