Practices and Trends of Machine Learning Application in Nanotoxicology

Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been applied in the field of nanotoxicology with very encouraging results. Adverse effects of nanoforms are affected by multiple features described by theoretical descriptors, nano-specific measured properties, and experimental conditions. ML has been proven very helpful in this field in order to gain an insight into features effecting toxicity, predicting possible adverse effects as part of proactive risk analysis, and informing safe design. At this juncture, it is important to document and categorize the work that has been carried out. This study investigates and bookmarks ML methodologies used to predict nano (eco)-toxicological outcomes in nanotoxicology during the last decade. It provides a review of the sequenced steps involved in implementing an ML model, from data pre-processing, to model implementation, model validation, and applicability domain. The review gathers and presents the step-wise information on techniques and procedures of existing models that can be used readily to assemble new nanotoxicological in silico studies and accelerates the regulation of in silico tools in nanotoxicology. ML applications in nanotoxicology comprise an active and diverse collection of ongoing efforts, although it is still in their early steps toward a scientific accord, subsequent guidelines, and regulation adoption. This study is an important bookend to a decade of ML applications to nanotoxicology and serves as a useful guide to further in silico applications.

[1]  Supratik Kar,et al.  On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models , 2015 .

[2]  F. Gharagheizi,et al.  A Molecular‐Based Model for Prediction of Solubility of C60 Fullerene in Various Solvents , 2008 .

[3]  R. Judson,et al.  Integrating data gap filling techniques: A case study predicting TEFs for neurotoxicity TEQs to facilitate the hazard assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[4]  Amir Amani,et al.  Cytotoxicity of chitosan/streptokinase nanoparticles as a function of size: An artificial neural networks study. , 2016, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[5]  Terry Wilkins,et al.  Accurate and interpretable nanoSAR models from genetic programming-based decision tree construction approaches , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[6]  Andrey A Toropov,et al.  Quasi-SMILES and nano-QFAR: united model for mutagenicity of fullerene and MWCNT under different conditions. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[7]  Irini Furxhi,et al.  Nanotoxicology data for in silico tools: a literature review , 2020, Nanotoxicology.

[8]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling. , 2010, ACS nano.

[9]  Irini Furxhi,et al.  Hazard Screening Methods for Nanomaterials: A Comparative Study , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[10]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[11]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Zeta Potential for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Predictive Model Developed by a Nano-Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship Approach , 2015 .

[12]  Haralambos Sarimveis,et al.  A safe-by-design tool for functionalised nanomaterials through the Enalos Nanoinformatics Cloud platform , 2018, Nanoscale advances.

[13]  Lindsey M. Bishop,et al.  Sparse Supervised Classification Methods Predict and Characterize Nanomaterial Exposures: Independent Markers of MWCNT Exposures , 2018, Toxicologic pathology.

[14]  Zhaoqing Pan,et al.  Multivariate statistical analysis for selecting optimal descriptors in the toxicity modeling of nanomaterials , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[15]  Shikha Gupta,et al.  Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting biological activity of diverse nanomaterials , 2014 .

[16]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Towards understanding mechanisms governing cytotoxicity of metal oxides nanoparticles: Hints from nano-QSAR studies , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[17]  Joris T.K. Quik,et al.  Directions in QPPR development to complement the predictive models used in risk assessment of nanomaterials , 2018, NanoImpact.

[18]  Haralambos Sarimveis,et al.  Perspectives from the NanoSafety Modelling Cluster on the validation criteria for (Q)SAR models used in nanotechnology. , 2017, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[19]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  Addressing a bottle neck for regulation of nanomaterials: quantitative read-across (Nano-QRA) algorithm for cases when only limited data is available , 2017 .

[20]  R. Lins,et al.  Comparative hazard analysis and toxicological modeling of diverse nanomaterials using the embryonic zebrafish (EZ) metric of toxicity , 2015, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[21]  E Benfenati,et al.  A quasi-QSPR modelling for the photocatalytic decolourization rate constants and cellular viability (CV%) of nanoparticles by CORAL† , 2015, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[22]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles in Escherichia coli correlates with conduction band and hydration energies. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Kostas Kostarelos,et al.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of nanoparticles. , 2010, ACS nano.

[24]  Feng Luan,et al.  Computational ecotoxicology: simultaneous prediction of ecotoxic effects of nanoparticles under different experimental conditions. , 2014, Environment international.

[25]  Yuliang Zhao,et al.  Intelligent testing strategy and analytical techniques for the safety assessment of nanomaterials , 2018, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[26]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  Critical Assessment of QSAR Models of Environmental Toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: Focusing on Applicability Domain and Overfitting by Variable Selection , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[27]  Georgia Melagraki,et al.  Enalos InSilicoNano platform: an online decision support tool for the design and virtual screening of nanoparticles , 2014 .

[28]  Haizhou Li,et al.  The Pareto Principle Is Everywhere: Finding Informative Sentences for Opinion Summarization Through Leader Detection , 2015, Recommendation and Search in Social Networks.

[29]  Nikita Basant,et al.  Multi-target QSTR modeling for simultaneous prediction of multiple toxicity endpoints of nano-metal oxides , 2017, Nanotoxicology.

[30]  Peter C. Jurs,et al.  Prediction of C60 Solubilities from Solvent Molecular Structures , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[31]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  CORAL: QSPR models for solubility of [C60] and [C70] fullerene derivatives , 2011, Molecular Diversity.

[32]  Bo-Han Su,et al.  Dependence of QSAR Models on the Selection of Trial Descriptor Sets: A Demonstration Using Nanotoxicity Endpoints of Decorated Nanotubes , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[33]  My Kieu Ha,et al.  Curation of datasets, assessment of their quality and completeness, and nanoSAR classification model development for metallic nanoparticles , 2018 .

[34]  Fabio Roli,et al.  Reject option with multiple thresholds , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[35]  Lin Zhao,et al.  An Experimental and Computational Approach to the Development of ZnO Nanoparticles that are Safe by Design. , 2016, Small.

[36]  Robert Rallo,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships for cellular uptake of surface-modified nanoparticles. , 2015, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[37]  Antonios D. Niros,et al.  Optimized Classification Predictions with a New Index Combining Machine Learning Algorithms , 2018, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[38]  A Worth,et al.  Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: a review , 2018, Nanotoxicology.

[39]  Hyung-Gi Byun,et al.  Quasi-SMILES-Based Nano-Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Model to Predict the Cytotoxicity of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes to Human Lung Cells. , 2018, Chemical research in toxicology.

[40]  Christian Micheletti,et al.  Implementation of Safe-by-Design for Nanomaterial Development and Safe Innovation: Why We Need a Comprehensive Approach , 2018, Nanomaterials.

[41]  Irini Furxhi,et al.  Predicting Nanomaterials toxicity pathways based on genome-wide transcriptomics studies using Bayesian networks , 2018, 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO).

[42]  Ceyda Oksel,et al.  Structure-activity Relationship Models for Hazard Assessment and Risk Management of Engineered Nanomaterials , 2015 .

[43]  Micha Rautenberg,et al.  Nano-Lazar: Read across Predictions for Nanoparticle Toxicities with Calculated and Measured Properties , 2017, Front. Pharmacol..

[44]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Computer-aided design of carbon nanotubes with the desired bioactivity and safety profiles , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[45]  Andrew Emili,et al.  Protein corona fingerprinting predicts the cellular interaction of gold and silver nanoparticles. , 2014, ACS nano.

[46]  Sabri Boughorbel,et al.  Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric , 2017, PloS one.

[47]  David A Groneberg,et al.  Gold nanoparticles: recent aspects for human toxicology , 2013, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology.

[48]  T Burgdorf,et al.  Workshop on the validation and regulatory acceptance of innovative 3R approaches in regulatory toxicology - Evolution versus revolution. , 2019, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[49]  Igor V Tetko,et al.  Modelling the toxicity of a large set of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles using the OCHEM platform. , 2017, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[50]  Finbarr Murphy,et al.  Application of Bayesian networks for hazard ranking of nanomaterials to support human health risk assessment , 2017, Nanotoxicology.

[51]  Danail Hristozov,et al.  Predicting toxic potencies of metal oxide nanoparticles by means of nano-QSARs , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[52]  J. Leszczynski,et al.  Modeling the Dispersibility of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Organic Solvents by Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Approach , 2015, Nanomaterials.

[53]  J. Leszczynski,et al.  Second generation periodic table-based descriptors to encode toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to multiple species: QSTR modeling for exploration of toxicity mechanisms , 2018 .

[54]  Egon L. Willighagen,et al.  RRegrs: an R package for computer-aided model selection with multiple regression models , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[55]  Mohmmad Younus Wani,et al.  Nanotoxicity: Dimensional and Morphological Concerns , 2011 .

[56]  Katarzyna Odziomek,et al.  Decision tree models to classify nanomaterials according to the DF4nanoGrouping scheme , 2018, Nanotoxicology.

[57]  Sanjay Mathur,et al.  Mapping the surface adsorption forces of nanomaterials in biological systems. , 2011, ACS nano.

[58]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic data into prediction of cytotoxicity for metal oxide nanoparticles under different conditions. , 2015, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[59]  Robert Rallo,et al.  Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with in vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials. , 2011, ACS nano.

[60]  Brajesh Dubey,et al.  Particle size, surface charge and concentration dependent ecotoxicity of three organo-coated silver nanoparticles: comparison between general linear model-predicted and observed toxicity. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[61]  Mohammad Hossein Habibi,et al.  Least square-support vector (LS-SVM) method for modeling of methylene blue dye adsorption using copper oxide loaded on activated carbon: Kinetic and isotherm study , 2014 .

[62]  Amalia Luque,et al.  The impact of class imbalance in classification performance metrics based on the binary confusion matrix , 2019, Pattern Recognit..

[63]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Causal inference methods to assist in mechanistic interpretation of classification nano-SAR models , 2015 .

[64]  Hamidreza Ghandehari,et al.  Predicting cytotoxicity of PAMAM dendrimers using molecular descriptors , 2015, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[65]  M. Natália D. S. Cordeiro,et al.  Probing the toxicity of nanoparticles: a unified in silico machine learning model based on perturbation theory , 2017, Nanotoxicology.

[66]  Irini Furxhi,et al.  Machine learning prediction of nanoparticle in vitro toxicity: A comparative study of classifiers and ensemble-classifiers using the Copeland Index. , 2019, Toxicology letters.

[67]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Understanding the toxicity of aggregated zero valent copper nanoparticles against Escherichia coli. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[68]  Tomasz Puzyn,et al.  Comparing the CORAL and Random Forest Approaches for Modelling the In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Silica Nanomaterials , 2016, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[69]  Iris Eisenberger,et al.  Making Nanomaterials Safer by Design? , 2017 .

[70]  Andrea-Nicole Richarz,et al.  Identification and description of the uncertainty, variability, bias and influence in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for toxicity prediction. , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[71]  Igor L. Medintz,et al.  Meta-analysis of cellular toxicity for cadmium-containing quantum dots. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.

[72]  T. Xia,et al.  Development of structure-activity relationship for metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2013, Nanoscale.

[73]  I. Ivanov,et al.  Comparative Study of Predictive Computational Models for Nanoparticle‐Induced Cytotoxicity , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[74]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Optimal nano-descriptors as translators of eclectic data into prediction of the cell membrane damage by means of nano metal-oxides , 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[75]  Jahan B. Ghasemi,et al.  An Alignment Independent 3D-QSAR Modeling of Dispersibility of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes in Different Organic Solvents , 2014 .

[76]  R. Natarajan,et al.  QSPR Modeling for Solubility of Fullerene (C60) in Organic Solvents , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[77]  Yong Pan,et al.  Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles using novel descriptors , 2016 .

[78]  Hwanho Choi,et al.  Development and application of a comprehensive machine learning program for predicting molecular biochemical and pharmacological properties. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[79]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  QSAR as a random event: modeling of nanoparticles uptake in PaCa2 cancer cells. , 2013, Chemosphere.

[80]  Maqc Consortium The MicroArray Quality Control ( MAQC )-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models , 2012 .

[81]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[82]  V. V. Kleandrova,et al.  Computational tool for risk assessment of nanomaterials: novel QSTR-perturbation model for simultaneous prediction of ecotoxicity and cytotoxicity of uncoated and coated nanoparticles under multiple experimental conditions. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[83]  Andrea Haase,et al.  Nanomaterial grouping: Existing approaches and future recommendations , 2019, NanoImpact.

[84]  Hans Bouwmeester,et al.  Characterization of translocation of silver nanoparticles and effects on whole-genome gene expression using an in vitro intestinal epithelium coculture model. , 2011, ACS nano.

[85]  Scott D. Kahn,et al.  Current Status of Methods for Defining the Applicability Domain of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[86]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Multiplicative SMILES-based optimal descriptors: QSPR modeling of fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents , 2007 .

[87]  Andrea Torsello,et al.  Making use of available and emerging data to predict the hazards of engineered nanomaterials by means of in silico tools: A critical review , 2019, NanoImpact.

[88]  Andrey A Toropov,et al.  Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic data into endpoint prediction: mutagenicity of fullerene as a mathematical function of conditions. , 2014, Chemosphere.

[89]  Cristian R. Munteanu,et al.  Experimental-Computational Study of Carbon Nanotube Effects on Mitochondrial Respiration: In Silico Nano-QSPR Machine Learning Models Based on New Raman Spectra Transform with Markov-Shannon Entropy Invariants , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[90]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. , 2012, ACS nano.

[91]  Andrey A Toropov,et al.  Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic information into the prediction of membrane damage by means of various TiO(2) nanoparticles. , 2013, Chemosphere.

[92]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Improved model for fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents based on quantum-chemical and topological descriptors , 2011 .

[93]  Juan José Villaverde,et al.  Considerations of nano-QSAR/QSPR models for nanopesticide risk assessment within the European legislative framework. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[94]  Serdar Durdagi,et al.  Computational design of novel fullerene analogues as potential HIV-1 PR inhibitors: Analysis of the binding interactions between fullerene inhibitors and HIV-1 PR residues using 3D QSAR, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. , 2008, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[95]  J. Leszczynski,et al.  Introduction of simplex-informational descriptors for QSPR analysis of fullerene derivatives , 2016, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry.

[96]  Chun Wei Yap,et al.  Quantitative Nanostructure–Activity Relationship modelling of nanoparticles , 2012 .

[97]  Jang Sik Choi,et al.  Toxicity Classification of Oxide Nanomaterials: Effects of Data Gap Filling and PChem Score-based Screening Approaches , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[98]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Modeling biological activities of nanoparticles. , 2012, Nano letters.

[99]  Tomasz Puzyn,et al.  Nano-quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling using easily computable and interpretable descriptors for uptake of magnetofluorescent engineered nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells. , 2014, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[100]  Oded Maimon,et al.  Predictive toxicology of cobalt nanoparticles and ions: comparative in vitro study of different cellular models using methods of knowledge discovery from data. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[101]  Christian Borgs,et al.  Unreasonable effectiveness of learning neural networks: From accessible states and robust ensembles to basic algorithmic schemes , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[102]  Hagar I. Labouta,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Cytotoxicity via Data-Mining the Literature. , 2019, ACS nano.

[103]  Qixing Zhou,et al.  Screening Priority Factors Determining and Predicting the Reproductive Toxicity of Various Nanoparticles. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[104]  Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg,et al.  Development of nanostructure–activity relationships assisting the nanomaterial hazard categorization for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making , 2016 .

[105]  Richarz Andrea,et al.  Evaluation of the availability and applicability of computational approaches in the safety assessment of nanomaterials: Final report of the Nanocomput project , 2017 .

[106]  Igor L. Medintz,et al.  Bayesian Network Resource for Meta-Analysis: Cellular Toxicity of Quantum Dots. , 2019, Small.

[107]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Extrapolating between toxicity endpoints of metal oxide nanoparticles: Predicting toxicity to Escherichia coli and human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) with Nano-QTTR. , 2016, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[108]  S. Tofail,et al.  A Tractable Method for Measuring Nanomaterial Risk Using Bayesian Networks , 2016, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[109]  R Weissleder,et al.  Modelling and predicting the biological effects of nanomaterials , 2014, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[110]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  From basic physics to mechanisms of toxicity: the "liquid drop" approach applied to develop predictive classification models for toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2014, Nanoscale.

[111]  Hyung-Gi Byun,et al.  Towards a generalized toxicity prediction model for oxide nanomaterials using integrated data from different sources , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[112]  Irini Furxhi,et al.  Application of Bayesian networks in determining nanoparticle-induced cellular outcomes using transcriptomics , 2019, Nanotoxicology.

[113]  Tomasz Puzyn,et al.  Nano-QSAR modeling for ecosafe design of heterogeneous TiO2-based nano-photocatalysts , 2018 .

[114]  A. Nel,et al.  Classification NanoSAR development for cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2011, Small.

[115]  Jeremy M. Gernand,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Carbon Nanotube Pulmonary Toxicity Studies—How Physical Dimensions and Impurities Affect the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[116]  Xue Z. Wang,et al.  (Q)SAR Modelling of Nanomaterial Toxicity - A Critical Review , 2015 .

[117]  A. Doucet-Panaye,et al.  Linear and non-linear modelling of the cytotoxicity of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles by empirical descriptors† , 2015, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[118]  Kyeongjae Cho,et al.  Developing Descriptors To Predict Mechanical Properties of Nanotubes , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[119]  A. Doucet-Panaye,et al.  Investigation of the influence of protein corona composition on gold nanoparticle bioactivity using machine learning approaches , 2016, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[120]  A Worth,et al.  Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: from data collection to assessment of the grouping hypothesis by application of chemoinformatic techniques , 2018, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[121]  Kaizhi Tang,et al.  Predictive modeling of nanomaterial exposure effects in biological systems , 2013, International journal of nanomedicine.

[122]  M. Ganjali,et al.  QSPR study on solubility of some fullerenes derivatives using the genetic algorithms — Multiple linear regression , 2015 .

[123]  Agnieszka Gajewicz,et al.  What if the number of nanotoxicity data is too small for developing predictive Nano-QSAR models? An alternative read-across based approach for filling data gaps. , 2017, Nanoscale.

[124]  Kunal Roy,et al.  How Precise Are Our Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Derived Predictions for New Query Chemicals? , 2018, ACS omega.

[125]  P. Duchowicz,et al.  Enhanced replacement method integration with genetic algorithms populations in QSAR and QSPR theories , 2015 .

[126]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Additive InChI-based optimal descriptors: QSPR modeling of fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents , 2009 .

[127]  Feng Luan,et al.  nanotoxicology : assessing cytotoxicity of nanoparticles under diverse experimental conditions by using a novel QSTR-perturbation approach † , 2014 .

[128]  G. Melagraki,et al.  A Risk Assessment Tool for the Virtual Screening of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles through Enalos InSilicoNano Platform. , 2015, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[129]  Min Li,et al.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Pharmaceutical Nanoparticles , 2016, The AAPS Journal.

[130]  Tomasz Puzyn,et al.  EU US Roadmap Nanoinformatics 2030 , 2018 .

[131]  Hyung-Gi Byun,et al.  Quasi-QSAR for predicting the cell viability of human lung and skin cells exposed to different metal oxide nanomaterials. , 2019, Chemosphere.

[132]  Kavitha Pathakoti,et al.  Using experimental data of Escherichia coli to develop a QSAR model for predicting the photo-induced cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2014, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[133]  F. Abbasitabar,et al.  New LSER Model Based on Solvent Empirical Parameters for the Prediction and Description of the Solubility of Buckminsterfullerene in Various Solvents , 2013, Journal of Solution Chemistry.

[134]  Martin Fritts,et al.  Integration among databases and data sets to support productive nanotechnology: Challenges and recommendations , 2018, NanoImpact.

[135]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Novel application of the CORAL software to model cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to bacteria Escherichia coli. , 2012, Chemosphere.

[136]  Feng Luan,et al.  Computational modeling in nanomedicine: prediction of multiple antibacterial profiles of nanoparticles using a quantitative structure-activity relationship perturbation model. , 2015, Nanomedicine.

[137]  K. Bratlie,et al.  Altering in vivo macrophage responses with modified polymer properties. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[138]  M. Salahinejad,et al.  QSAR studies of the dispersion of SWNTs in different organic solvents , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[139]  Manuel Mucientes,et al.  STAC: A web platform for the comparison of algorithms using statistical tests , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[140]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  How the toxicity of nanomaterials towards different species could be simultaneously evaluated: a novel multi-nano-read-across approach. , 2018, Nanoscale.

[141]  L. Lamon,et al.  Computational models for the assessment of manufactured nanomaterials: Development of model reporting standards and mapping of the model landscape , 2019, Computational toxicology.

[142]  Humayun Kabir,et al.  Comparative Studies on Some Metrics for External Validation of QSPR Models , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[143]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  QSAR modeling of adipose/blood partition coefficients of Alcohols, PCBs, PBDEs, PCDDs and PAHs: A data gap filling approach. , 2018, Environment international.

[144]  W. Chan,et al.  Prediction of nanoparticles-cell association based on corona proteins and physicochemical properties. , 2015, Nanoscale.

[145]  Emilio Benfenati,et al.  Quasi-SMILES as a tool to utilize eclectic data for predicting the behavior of nanomaterials , 2016 .

[146]  Mohammad Hossein Fatemi,et al.  Modeling the cellular uptake of magnetofluorescent nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells : a quantitative structure activity relationship study , 2012 .

[147]  M. Hormozi-Nezhad,et al.  Using nano-QSAR to determine the most responsible factor(s) in gold nanoparticle exocytosis , 2015 .