Practices and Trends of Machine Learning Application in Nanotoxicology
暂无分享,去创建一个
Irini Furxhi | Finbarr Murphy | Martin Mullins | Athanasios Arvanitis | Craig A Poland | Finbarr Murphy | Martin Mullins | I. Furxhi | A. Arvanitis | C. Poland | Irini Furxhi
[1] Supratik Kar,et al. On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models , 2015 .
[2] F. Gharagheizi,et al. A Molecular‐Based Model for Prediction of Solubility of C60 Fullerene in Various Solvents , 2008 .
[3] R. Judson,et al. Integrating data gap filling techniques: A case study predicting TEFs for neurotoxicity TEQs to facilitate the hazard assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[4] Amir Amani,et al. Cytotoxicity of chitosan/streptokinase nanoparticles as a function of size: An artificial neural networks study. , 2016, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.
[5] Terry Wilkins,et al. Accurate and interpretable nanoSAR models from genetic programming-based decision tree construction approaches , 2016, Nanotoxicology.
[6] Andrey A Toropov,et al. Quasi-SMILES and nano-QFAR: united model for mutagenicity of fullerene and MWCNT under different conditions. , 2015, Chemosphere.
[7] Irini Furxhi,et al. Nanotoxicology data for in silico tools: a literature review , 2020, Nanotoxicology.
[8] A. Tropsha,et al. Quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling. , 2010, ACS nano.
[9] Irini Furxhi,et al. Hazard Screening Methods for Nanomaterials: A Comparative Study , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.
[10] Thomas Hartung,et al. "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. , 2009, Toxicology letters.
[11] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Zeta Potential for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Predictive Model Developed by a Nano-Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship Approach , 2015 .
[12] Haralambos Sarimveis,et al. A safe-by-design tool for functionalised nanomaterials through the Enalos Nanoinformatics Cloud platform , 2018, Nanoscale advances.
[13] Lindsey M. Bishop,et al. Sparse Supervised Classification Methods Predict and Characterize Nanomaterial Exposures: Independent Markers of MWCNT Exposures , 2018, Toxicologic pathology.
[14] Zhaoqing Pan,et al. Multivariate statistical analysis for selecting optimal descriptors in the toxicity modeling of nanomaterials , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.
[15] Shikha Gupta,et al. Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting biological activity of diverse nanomaterials , 2014 .
[16] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Towards understanding mechanisms governing cytotoxicity of metal oxides nanoparticles: Hints from nano-QSAR studies , 2015, Nanotoxicology.
[17] Joris T.K. Quik,et al. Directions in QPPR development to complement the predictive models used in risk assessment of nanomaterials , 2018, NanoImpact.
[18] Haralambos Sarimveis,et al. Perspectives from the NanoSafety Modelling Cluster on the validation criteria for (Q)SAR models used in nanotechnology. , 2017, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[19] Mark T. D. Cronin,et al. Addressing a bottle neck for regulation of nanomaterials: quantitative read-across (Nano-QRA) algorithm for cases when only limited data is available , 2017 .
[20] R. Lins,et al. Comparative hazard analysis and toxicological modeling of diverse nanomaterials using the embryonic zebrafish (EZ) metric of toxicity , 2015, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.
[21] E Benfenati,et al. A quasi-QSPR modelling for the photocatalytic decolourization rate constants and cellular viability (CV%) of nanoparticles by CORAL† , 2015, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[22] Lutz Mädler,et al. Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles in Escherichia coli correlates with conduction band and hydration energies. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.
[23] Kostas Kostarelos,et al. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of nanoparticles. , 2010, ACS nano.
[24] Feng Luan,et al. Computational ecotoxicology: simultaneous prediction of ecotoxic effects of nanoparticles under different experimental conditions. , 2014, Environment international.
[25] Yuliang Zhao,et al. Intelligent testing strategy and analytical techniques for the safety assessment of nanomaterials , 2018, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.
[26] Igor V. Tetko,et al. Critical Assessment of QSAR Models of Environmental Toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: Focusing on Applicability Domain and Overfitting by Variable Selection , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[27] Georgia Melagraki,et al. Enalos InSilicoNano platform: an online decision support tool for the design and virtual screening of nanoparticles , 2014 .
[28] Haizhou Li,et al. The Pareto Principle Is Everywhere: Finding Informative Sentences for Opinion Summarization Through Leader Detection , 2015, Recommendation and Search in Social Networks.
[29] Nikita Basant,et al. Multi-target QSTR modeling for simultaneous prediction of multiple toxicity endpoints of nano-metal oxides , 2017, Nanotoxicology.
[30] Peter C. Jurs,et al. Prediction of C60 Solubilities from Solvent Molecular Structures , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[31] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. CORAL: QSPR models for solubility of [C60] and [C70] fullerene derivatives , 2011, Molecular Diversity.
[32] Bo-Han Su,et al. Dependence of QSAR Models on the Selection of Trial Descriptor Sets: A Demonstration Using Nanotoxicity Endpoints of Decorated Nanotubes , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[33] My Kieu Ha,et al. Curation of datasets, assessment of their quality and completeness, and nanoSAR classification model development for metallic nanoparticles , 2018 .
[34] Fabio Roli,et al. Reject option with multiple thresholds , 2000, Pattern Recognit..
[35] Lin Zhao,et al. An Experimental and Computational Approach to the Development of ZnO Nanoparticles that are Safe by Design. , 2016, Small.
[36] Robert Rallo,et al. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for cellular uptake of surface-modified nanoparticles. , 2015, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[37] Antonios D. Niros,et al. Optimized Classification Predictions with a New Index Combining Machine Learning Algorithms , 2018, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.
[38] A Worth,et al. Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: a review , 2018, Nanotoxicology.
[39] Hyung-Gi Byun,et al. Quasi-SMILES-Based Nano-Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Model to Predict the Cytotoxicity of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes to Human Lung Cells. , 2018, Chemical research in toxicology.
[40] Christian Micheletti,et al. Implementation of Safe-by-Design for Nanomaterial Development and Safe Innovation: Why We Need a Comprehensive Approach , 2018, Nanomaterials.
[41] Irini Furxhi,et al. Predicting Nanomaterials toxicity pathways based on genome-wide transcriptomics studies using Bayesian networks , 2018, 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO).
[42] Ceyda Oksel,et al. Structure-activity Relationship Models for Hazard Assessment and Risk Management of Engineered Nanomaterials , 2015 .
[43] Micha Rautenberg,et al. Nano-Lazar: Read across Predictions for Nanoparticle Toxicities with Calculated and Measured Properties , 2017, Front. Pharmacol..
[44] A. Tropsha,et al. Computer-aided design of carbon nanotubes with the desired bioactivity and safety profiles , 2016, Nanotoxicology.
[45] Andrew Emili,et al. Protein corona fingerprinting predicts the cellular interaction of gold and silver nanoparticles. , 2014, ACS nano.
[46] Sabri Boughorbel,et al. Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric , 2017, PloS one.
[47] David A Groneberg,et al. Gold nanoparticles: recent aspects for human toxicology , 2013, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology.
[48] T Burgdorf,et al. Workshop on the validation and regulatory acceptance of innovative 3R approaches in regulatory toxicology - Evolution versus revolution. , 2019, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.
[49] Igor V Tetko,et al. Modelling the toxicity of a large set of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles using the OCHEM platform. , 2017, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[50] Finbarr Murphy,et al. Application of Bayesian networks for hazard ranking of nanomaterials to support human health risk assessment , 2017, Nanotoxicology.
[51] Danail Hristozov,et al. Predicting toxic potencies of metal oxide nanoparticles by means of nano-QSARs , 2016, Nanotoxicology.
[52] J. Leszczynski,et al. Modeling the Dispersibility of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Organic Solvents by Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Approach , 2015, Nanomaterials.
[53] J. Leszczynski,et al. Second generation periodic table-based descriptors to encode toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to multiple species: QSTR modeling for exploration of toxicity mechanisms , 2018 .
[54] Egon L. Willighagen,et al. RRegrs: an R package for computer-aided model selection with multiple regression models , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[55] Mohmmad Younus Wani,et al. Nanotoxicity: Dimensional and Morphological Concerns , 2011 .
[56] Katarzyna Odziomek,et al. Decision tree models to classify nanomaterials according to the DF4nanoGrouping scheme , 2018, Nanotoxicology.
[57] Sanjay Mathur,et al. Mapping the surface adsorption forces of nanomaterials in biological systems. , 2011, ACS nano.
[58] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic data into prediction of cytotoxicity for metal oxide nanoparticles under different conditions. , 2015, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.
[59] Robert Rallo,et al. Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with in vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials. , 2011, ACS nano.
[60] Brajesh Dubey,et al. Particle size, surface charge and concentration dependent ecotoxicity of three organo-coated silver nanoparticles: comparison between general linear model-predicted and observed toxicity. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.
[61] Mohammad Hossein Habibi,et al. Least square-support vector (LS-SVM) method for modeling of methylene blue dye adsorption using copper oxide loaded on activated carbon: Kinetic and isotherm study , 2014 .
[62] Amalia Luque,et al. The impact of class imbalance in classification performance metrics based on the binary confusion matrix , 2019, Pattern Recognit..
[63] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Causal inference methods to assist in mechanistic interpretation of classification nano-SAR models , 2015 .
[64] Hamidreza Ghandehari,et al. Predicting cytotoxicity of PAMAM dendrimers using molecular descriptors , 2015, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.
[65] M. Natália D. S. Cordeiro,et al. Probing the toxicity of nanoparticles: a unified in silico machine learning model based on perturbation theory , 2017, Nanotoxicology.
[66] Irini Furxhi,et al. Machine learning prediction of nanoparticle in vitro toxicity: A comparative study of classifiers and ensemble-classifiers using the Copeland Index. , 2019, Toxicology letters.
[67] Amit Kumar,et al. Understanding the toxicity of aggregated zero valent copper nanoparticles against Escherichia coli. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.
[68] Tomasz Puzyn,et al. Comparing the CORAL and Random Forest Approaches for Modelling the In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Silica Nanomaterials , 2016, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.
[69] Iris Eisenberger,et al. Making Nanomaterials Safer by Design? , 2017 .
[70] Andrea-Nicole Richarz,et al. Identification and description of the uncertainty, variability, bias and influence in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for toxicity prediction. , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[71] Igor L. Medintz,et al. Meta-analysis of cellular toxicity for cadmium-containing quantum dots. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.
[72] T. Xia,et al. Development of structure-activity relationship for metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2013, Nanoscale.
[73] I. Ivanov,et al. Comparative Study of Predictive Computational Models for Nanoparticle‐Induced Cytotoxicity , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[74] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Optimal nano-descriptors as translators of eclectic data into prediction of the cell membrane damage by means of nano metal-oxides , 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[75] Jahan B. Ghasemi,et al. An Alignment Independent 3D-QSAR Modeling of Dispersibility of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes in Different Organic Solvents , 2014 .
[76] R. Natarajan,et al. QSPR Modeling for Solubility of Fullerene (C60) in Organic Solvents , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[77] Yong Pan,et al. Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles using novel descriptors , 2016 .
[78] Hwanho Choi,et al. Development and application of a comprehensive machine learning program for predicting molecular biochemical and pharmacological properties. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[79] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. QSAR as a random event: modeling of nanoparticles uptake in PaCa2 cancer cells. , 2013, Chemosphere.
[80] Maqc Consortium. The MicroArray Quality Control ( MAQC )-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models , 2012 .
[81] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.
[82] V. V. Kleandrova,et al. Computational tool for risk assessment of nanomaterials: novel QSTR-perturbation model for simultaneous prediction of ecotoxicity and cytotoxicity of uncoated and coated nanoparticles under multiple experimental conditions. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.
[83] Andrea Haase,et al. Nanomaterial grouping: Existing approaches and future recommendations , 2019, NanoImpact.
[84] Hans Bouwmeester,et al. Characterization of translocation of silver nanoparticles and effects on whole-genome gene expression using an in vitro intestinal epithelium coculture model. , 2011, ACS nano.
[85] Scott D. Kahn,et al. Current Status of Methods for Defining the Applicability Domain of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.
[86] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Multiplicative SMILES-based optimal descriptors: QSPR modeling of fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents , 2007 .
[87] Andrea Torsello,et al. Making use of available and emerging data to predict the hazards of engineered nanomaterials by means of in silico tools: A critical review , 2019, NanoImpact.
[88] Andrey A Toropov,et al. Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic data into endpoint prediction: mutagenicity of fullerene as a mathematical function of conditions. , 2014, Chemosphere.
[89] Cristian R. Munteanu,et al. Experimental-Computational Study of Carbon Nanotube Effects on Mitochondrial Respiration: In Silico Nano-QSPR Machine Learning Models Based on New Raman Spectra Transform with Markov-Shannon Entropy Invariants , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[90] Lutz Mädler,et al. Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. , 2012, ACS nano.
[91] Andrey A Toropov,et al. Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic information into the prediction of membrane damage by means of various TiO(2) nanoparticles. , 2013, Chemosphere.
[92] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Improved model for fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents based on quantum-chemical and topological descriptors , 2011 .
[93] Juan José Villaverde,et al. Considerations of nano-QSAR/QSPR models for nanopesticide risk assessment within the European legislative framework. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.
[94] Serdar Durdagi,et al. Computational design of novel fullerene analogues as potential HIV-1 PR inhibitors: Analysis of the binding interactions between fullerene inhibitors and HIV-1 PR residues using 3D QSAR, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. , 2008, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[95] J. Leszczynski,et al. Introduction of simplex-informational descriptors for QSPR analysis of fullerene derivatives , 2016, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry.
[96] Chun Wei Yap,et al. Quantitative Nanostructure–Activity Relationship modelling of nanoparticles , 2012 .
[97] Jang Sik Choi,et al. Toxicity Classification of Oxide Nanomaterials: Effects of Data Gap Filling and PChem Score-based Screening Approaches , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[98] R. Weissleder,et al. Modeling biological activities of nanoparticles. , 2012, Nano letters.
[99] Tomasz Puzyn,et al. Nano-quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling using easily computable and interpretable descriptors for uptake of magnetofluorescent engineered nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells. , 2014, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.
[100] Oded Maimon,et al. Predictive toxicology of cobalt nanoparticles and ions: comparative in vitro study of different cellular models using methods of knowledge discovery from data. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[101] Christian Borgs,et al. Unreasonable effectiveness of learning neural networks: From accessible states and robust ensembles to basic algorithmic schemes , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[102] Hagar I. Labouta,et al. Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Cytotoxicity via Data-Mining the Literature. , 2019, ACS nano.
[103] Qixing Zhou,et al. Screening Priority Factors Determining and Predicting the Reproductive Toxicity of Various Nanoparticles. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.
[104] Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg,et al. Development of nanostructure–activity relationships assisting the nanomaterial hazard categorization for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making , 2016 .
[105] Richarz Andrea,et al. Evaluation of the availability and applicability of computational approaches in the safety assessment of nanomaterials: Final report of the Nanocomput project , 2017 .
[106] Igor L. Medintz,et al. Bayesian Network Resource for Meta-Analysis: Cellular Toxicity of Quantum Dots. , 2019, Small.
[107] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Extrapolating between toxicity endpoints of metal oxide nanoparticles: Predicting toxicity to Escherichia coli and human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) with Nano-QTTR. , 2016, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.
[108] S. Tofail,et al. A Tractable Method for Measuring Nanomaterial Risk Using Bayesian Networks , 2016, Nanoscale Research Letters.
[109] R Weissleder,et al. Modelling and predicting the biological effects of nanomaterials , 2014, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[110] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. From basic physics to mechanisms of toxicity: the "liquid drop" approach applied to develop predictive classification models for toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2014, Nanoscale.
[111] Hyung-Gi Byun,et al. Towards a generalized toxicity prediction model for oxide nanomaterials using integrated data from different sources , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[112] Irini Furxhi,et al. Application of Bayesian networks in determining nanoparticle-induced cellular outcomes using transcriptomics , 2019, Nanotoxicology.
[113] Tomasz Puzyn,et al. Nano-QSAR modeling for ecosafe design of heterogeneous TiO2-based nano-photocatalysts , 2018 .
[114] A. Nel,et al. Classification NanoSAR development for cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2011, Small.
[115] Jeremy M. Gernand,et al. A Meta‐Analysis of Carbon Nanotube Pulmonary Toxicity Studies—How Physical Dimensions and Impurities Affect the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[116] Xue Z. Wang,et al. (Q)SAR Modelling of Nanomaterial Toxicity - A Critical Review , 2015 .
[117] A. Doucet-Panaye,et al. Linear and non-linear modelling of the cytotoxicity of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles by empirical descriptors† , 2015, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[118] Kyeongjae Cho,et al. Developing Descriptors To Predict Mechanical Properties of Nanotubes , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[119] A. Doucet-Panaye,et al. Investigation of the influence of protein corona composition on gold nanoparticle bioactivity using machine learning approaches , 2016, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[120] A Worth,et al. Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: from data collection to assessment of the grouping hypothesis by application of chemoinformatic techniques , 2018, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.
[121] Kaizhi Tang,et al. Predictive modeling of nanomaterial exposure effects in biological systems , 2013, International journal of nanomedicine.
[122] M. Ganjali,et al. QSPR study on solubility of some fullerenes derivatives using the genetic algorithms — Multiple linear regression , 2015 .
[123] Agnieszka Gajewicz,et al. What if the number of nanotoxicity data is too small for developing predictive Nano-QSAR models? An alternative read-across based approach for filling data gaps. , 2017, Nanoscale.
[124] Kunal Roy,et al. How Precise Are Our Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Derived Predictions for New Query Chemicals? , 2018, ACS omega.
[125] P. Duchowicz,et al. Enhanced replacement method integration with genetic algorithms populations in QSAR and QSPR theories , 2015 .
[126] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Additive InChI-based optimal descriptors: QSPR modeling of fullerene C60 solubility in organic solvents , 2009 .
[127] Feng Luan,et al. nanotoxicology : assessing cytotoxicity of nanoparticles under diverse experimental conditions by using a novel QSTR-perturbation approach † , 2014 .
[128] G. Melagraki,et al. A Risk Assessment Tool for the Virtual Screening of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles through Enalos InSilicoNano Platform. , 2015, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[129] Min Li,et al. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Pharmaceutical Nanoparticles , 2016, The AAPS Journal.
[130] Tomasz Puzyn,et al. EU US Roadmap Nanoinformatics 2030 , 2018 .
[131] Hyung-Gi Byun,et al. Quasi-QSAR for predicting the cell viability of human lung and skin cells exposed to different metal oxide nanomaterials. , 2019, Chemosphere.
[132] Kavitha Pathakoti,et al. Using experimental data of Escherichia coli to develop a QSAR model for predicting the photo-induced cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2014, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.
[133] F. Abbasitabar,et al. New LSER Model Based on Solvent Empirical Parameters for the Prediction and Description of the Solubility of Buckminsterfullerene in Various Solvents , 2013, Journal of Solution Chemistry.
[134] Martin Fritts,et al. Integration among databases and data sets to support productive nanotechnology: Challenges and recommendations , 2018, NanoImpact.
[135] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Novel application of the CORAL software to model cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to bacteria Escherichia coli. , 2012, Chemosphere.
[136] Feng Luan,et al. Computational modeling in nanomedicine: prediction of multiple antibacterial profiles of nanoparticles using a quantitative structure-activity relationship perturbation model. , 2015, Nanomedicine.
[137] K. Bratlie,et al. Altering in vivo macrophage responses with modified polymer properties. , 2015, Biomaterials.
[138] M. Salahinejad,et al. QSAR studies of the dispersion of SWNTs in different organic solvents , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.
[139] Manuel Mucientes,et al. STAC: A web platform for the comparison of algorithms using statistical tests , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).
[140] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. How the toxicity of nanomaterials towards different species could be simultaneously evaluated: a novel multi-nano-read-across approach. , 2018, Nanoscale.
[141] L. Lamon,et al. Computational models for the assessment of manufactured nanomaterials: Development of model reporting standards and mapping of the model landscape , 2019, Computational toxicology.
[142] Humayun Kabir,et al. Comparative Studies on Some Metrics for External Validation of QSPR Models , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[143] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. QSAR modeling of adipose/blood partition coefficients of Alcohols, PCBs, PBDEs, PCDDs and PAHs: A data gap filling approach. , 2018, Environment international.
[144] W. Chan,et al. Prediction of nanoparticles-cell association based on corona proteins and physicochemical properties. , 2015, Nanoscale.
[145] Emilio Benfenati,et al. Quasi-SMILES as a tool to utilize eclectic data for predicting the behavior of nanomaterials , 2016 .
[146] Mohammad Hossein Fatemi,et al. Modeling the cellular uptake of magnetofluorescent nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells : a quantitative structure activity relationship study , 2012 .
[147] M. Hormozi-Nezhad,et al. Using nano-QSAR to determine the most responsible factor(s) in gold nanoparticle exocytosis , 2015 .