The Use of a Wax Bite Wafer and a Double Computed Tomography Scan Procedure to Obtain a Three-Dimensional Augmented Virtual Skull Model

A detailed visualization of the interocclusal relationship is essential in a three-dimensional virtual planning setup for orthognathic and facial orthomorphic surgery. The purpose of this study was to introduce and evaluate the use of a wax bite wafer in combination with a double computed tomography (CT) scan procedure to augment the three-dimensional virtual model of the skull with a detailed dental surface. A total of 10 orthognathic patients were scanned after a standardized multislice CT scanning protocol with dose reduction with their wax bite wafer in place. Afterward, the impressions of the upper and lower arches and the wax bite wafer were scanned for each patient separately using a high-resolution standardized multislice CT scanning protocol. Accurate fitting of the virtual impressions on the wax bite wafer was done with surface matching using iterative closest points. Consecutively, automatic rigid point-based registration of the wax bite wafer on the patient scan was performed to implement the digital virtual dental arches into the patient's skull model (Maxilim, version 2.0; Medicim NV, St-Niklaas, Belgium). Probability error histograms showed errors of ≤0.16 mm (25% percentile), ≤0.31 mm (50% percentile), and ≤0.92 (90% percentile) for iterative closest point surface matching. The mean registration error for automatic point-based registration was 0.17 ± 0.07 mm (range, 0.12-0.22 mm). The combination of the wax bite wafer with the double CT scan procedure allowed for the setup of an accurate three-dimensional virtual augmented model of the skull with detailed dental surface. However, from a clinical workload, data handling, and computational point of view, this method is too time-consuming to be introduced in the clinical routine.

[1]  H. Kärcher,et al.  Three-dimensional craniofacial surgery: transfer from a three-dimensional model (Endoplan) to clinical surgery: a new technique (Graz). , 1992, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[2]  Filip Schutyser,et al.  From 3-D Volumetric Computer Tomography to 3-D Cephalometry , 2006 .

[3]  James S. Duncan,et al.  A Robust Point Matching Algorithm for Autoradiograph Alignment , 1996, VBC.

[4]  G. Santler,et al.  The Graz hemisphere splint: a new precise, non-invasive method of replacing the dental arch of 3D-models by plaster models. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[5]  S. Brooks,et al.  Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  G. Swennen,et al.  The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[8]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  G. Adam,et al.  Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Robust Visualization of the Dental Occlusion by a Double Scan Procedure , 2005, MICCAI.

[12]  Filip Schutyser,et al.  Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  D. Hatcher,et al.  Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[14]  E Nkenke,et al.  Fusion of computed tomography data and optical 3D images of the dentition for streak artefact correction in the simulation of orthognathic surgery. , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[15]  James S. Duncan,et al.  A robust point-matching algorithm for autoradiograph alignment , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  H. Terai,et al.  Accuracy of integration of dental casts in three-dimensional models. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  Kostas Tsiklakis,et al.  Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. , 2005, European journal of radiology.