Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR

In recent years, LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and especially Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) systems have shown the potential to revolutionise forest structural characterisation by providing unprecedented 3D data. However, manned Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) requires costly campaigns and produces relatively low point density, while TLS is labour intense and time demanding. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne laser scanning can be the way in between. In this study, we present first results and experiences with the RIEGL RiCOPTER with VUX®-1UAV ALS system and compare it with the well tested RIEGL VZ-400 TLS system. We scanned the same forest plots with both systems over the course of two days. We derived Digital Terrain Models (DTMs), Digital Surface Models (DSMs) and finally Canopy Height Models (CHMs) from the resulting point clouds. ALS CHMs were on average 11.5 cm higher in five plots with different canopy conditions. This showed that TLS could not always detect the top of canopy. Moreover, we extracted trunk segments of 58 trees for ALS and TLS simultaneously, of which 39 could be used to model Diameter at Breast Height (DBH). ALS DBH showed a high agreement with TLS DBH with a correlation coefficient of 0.98 and root mean square error of 4.24 cm. We conclude that RiCOPTER has the potential to perform comparable to TLS for estimating forest canopy height and DBH under the studied forest conditions. Further research should be directed to testing UAV-borne LiDAR for explicit 3D modelling of whole trees to estimate tree volume and subsequently Above-Ground Biomass (AGB).

[1]  M. Herold,et al.  Data acquisition considerations for Terrestrial Laser Scanning of forest plots , 2017 .

[2]  R. Brandl,et al.  Contrasting performance of Lidar and optical texture models in predicting avian diversity in a tropical mountain forest , 2016 .

[3]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Assessing Precision in Conventional Field Measurements of Individual Tree Attributes , 2017 .

[4]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Evaluating Tree Detection and Segmentation Routines on Very High Resolution UAV LiDAR Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Jan Verbesselt,et al.  The Speulderbos fiducial reference site for continuous monitoring of forest biophysical variables , 2016 .

[6]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[7]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Fast Automatic Precision Tree Models from Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[8]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Plot-Scale Forest Measurement , 2015, Current Forestry Reports.

[9]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Spatial variability in tropical forest leaf area density from multireturn lidar and modeling , 2015 .

[10]  Yi Lin,et al.  A low-cost multi-sensoral mobile mapping system and its feasibility for tree measurements , 2010 .

[11]  M. Herold,et al.  Estimation of above‐ground biomass of large tropical trees with terrestrial LiDAR , 2017 .

[12]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Deriving and validating Leaf Area Index (LAI) at multiple spatial scales through lidar remote sensing: a case study in Sierra National Forest, CA , 2014 .

[13]  M. Herold,et al.  Nondestructive estimates of above‐ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning , 2015 .

[14]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Development of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[15]  I. D. Coope,et al.  Circle fitting by linear and nonlinear least squares , 1993 .

[16]  Felix Morsdorf,et al.  Assessing forest structural and physiological information content of multi-spectral LiDAR waveforms by radiative transfer modelling , 2009 .

[17]  Juha Suomalainen,et al.  A Lightweight Hyperspectral Mapping System and Photogrammetric Processing Chain for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  An Assessment of the Repeatability of Automatic Forest Inventory Metrics Derived From UAV-Borne Laser Scanning Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Guan-Zhong Cao,et al.  Vegetation filtering algorithm for UAV-borne lidar point clouds: a case study in the middle-lower Yangtze River riparian zone , 2017 .

[20]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[21]  Jonathan P. Sheppard,et al.  Highly Accurate Tree Models Derived from Terrestrial Laser Scan Data: A Method Description , 2014 .

[22]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  Beyond 3-D: The New Spectrum of Lidar Applications for Earth and Ecological Sciences , 2016 .

[23]  N. Coops,et al.  Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand , 2010, Trees.

[24]  Andrea Berton,et al.  Forestry applications of UAVs in Europe: a review , 2017 .

[25]  S. Ustin,et al.  Canopy clumping appraisal using terrestrial and airborne laser scanning , 2015 .

[26]  Jinqiang Cui,et al.  UAV LiDAR for below-canopy forest surveys , 2013 .

[27]  K. Itten,et al.  Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction , 2006 .

[28]  F. Rocca,et al.  The BIOMASS mission: Mapping global forest biomass to better understand the terrestrial carbon cycle , 2011 .