Dictating and editing short texts while driving: distraction and task completion

This paper presents a multi-modal automotive dictation editor (codenamed ECOR) used to compose and correct text messages while driving. The goals are to keep driver's distraction minimal while achieving good task completion rates and times as well as acceptance by users. We report test results for a set of 28 native US-English speakers using the system while driving a standard lane-change-test (LCT) car simulator. The dictation editor was tested (1) without any display, (2) with a display showing the full edited text, and (3) with just the "active" part of text being shown. In all cases, the system provided extensive text-to-speech feedback in order to prevent the driver from having to look at the display. In addition, cell phone messaging and GPS destination entry were evaluated as reference tasks. The test subjects were instructed to send text messages containing prescribed semantic information, and were given a list of destinations for the GPS task. The levels of driver distraction (evaluated by car's deviation from an ideal track, reaction times, number of missed lane change signs, eye gaze information etc.) were compared between the 3 ECOR and the 2 reference tasks, and also to undistracted driving. Task completion was measured by the number and quality of messages sent out during a 4 minute LCT ride, and subjective feedback was collected via questionnaires. Results indicate that the eyes-free version keeps the distraction level acceptable while achieving good task completion rate. Both multi-modal versions caused more distraction than the eyes-free version and were comparable to the GPS entry task. For native speakers, the missing display for the eyes-free version did not impact quality of dictated text. By far, the cell phone texting task was the most distracting one. Text composition speed using dictation was faster than cell phone typing.

[1]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Driver distraction : a review of the literature , 2007 .

[2]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[3]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes , 2001 .

[4]  B. Thomas,et al.  Usability Evaluation In Industry , 1996 .

[5]  Paul Green,et al.  Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-Vehicle Tasks while Driving: A Brief Literature Review , 2006 .

[6]  Gerald Lee Dillingham AVIATION RULEMAKING: INCOMPLETE IMPLEMENTATION IMPAIRED FAA'S REFORM EFFORTS: STATEMENT OF GERALD L. DILLINGHAM, DIRECTOR, PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES: TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AVIATION, COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. , 2001 .

[7]  Jan Kleindienst,et al.  In-Car Dictation and Driver's Distraction: A Case Study , 2011, HCI.

[8]  A P Vulcan,et al.  THE MONASH UNIVERSITY ACCIDENT RESEARCH CENTRE , 1991 .

[9]  Keith Vertanen,et al.  Speech and speech recognition during dictation corrections , 2006, INTERSPEECH.

[10]  Tim Paek,et al.  A voice search approach to replying to SMS messages in automobiles , 2009, INTERSPEECH.

[11]  Alexander H. Waibel,et al.  Multimodal error correction for speech user interfaces , 2001, TCHI.

[12]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[13]  Zeljko Medenica,et al.  Comparing the Influence of Two User Interfaces for Mobile Radios on Driving Performance , 2007 .

[14]  A. Hamish Jamson,et al.  Speech-Based E-Mail and Driver Behavior: Effects of an In-Vehicle Message System Interface , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Max Duraz,et al.  IMPAIRMENT OF LANE CHANGE PERFORMANCE DUE TO DISTRACTION : EFFECT OF EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXTS , 2008 .

[16]  Elizabeth N. Mazzae,et al.  Measuring Distraction Potential of Operating In-Vehicle Devices , 2009 .

[17]  Ying Wang,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF DEGRADATION EFFECTS OF MOBILE PHONE USE ON DRIVING PERFORMANCE WITH DRIVING SIMULATION , 2008 .

[18]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Designing the User Interface for Multimodal Speech and Pen-Based Gesture Applications: State-of-the-Art Systems and Future Research Directions , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  The effects of text messaging on young novice driver performance , 2005 .