Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction.

It is commonly assumed that one can always assign a direction-upward or downward-to a percept of pitch change. The present study shows that this is true for some, but not all, listeners. Frequency difference limens (FDLs, in cents) for pure tones roved in frequency were measured in two conditions. In one condition, the task was to detect frequency changes; in the other condition, the task was to identify the direction of frequency changes. For three listeners, the identification FDL was about 1.5 times smaller than the detection FDL, as predicted (counterintuitively) by signal detection theory under the assumption that performance in the two conditions was limited by one and the same internal noise. For three other listeners, however, the identification FDL was much larger than the detection FDL. The latter listeners had relatively high detection FDLs. They had no difficulty in identifying the direction of just-detectable changes in intensity, or in the frequency of amplitude modulation. Their difficulty in perceiving the direction of small frequency/pitch changes showed up not only when the task required absolute judgments of direction, but also when the directions of two successive frequency changes had to be judged as identical or different.

[1]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. VIII. Loudness comparisons between different types of stimuli. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Laurent Demany,et al.  On the binding of successive sounds: perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitches. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. Bachem,et al.  Tone height and tone chroma as two different pitch qualities. , 1950 .

[4]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the frequency discrimination of pulsed tones and the detection of frequency modulation , 1989 .

[5]  R. Ritsma Existence Region of the Tonal Residue. I , 1962 .

[6]  L. Demany,et al.  The slow formation of a pitch percept beyond the ending time of a short tone burst , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Louis D Braida,et al.  Functional role of auditory cortex in frequency processing and pitch perception. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Functional specificity in the right human auditory cortex for perceiving pitch direction. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Catherine Semal,et al.  Learning to perceive pitch differences. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Neuronal populations in the human brain extracting invariant relationships from acoustic variance , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Comparing F0 discrimination in sequential and simultaneous conditions. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B. Moore,et al.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency, measured in several ways. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  D. M. Green,et al.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Isabelle Peretz,et al.  Characterization of deficits in pitch perception underlying 'tone deafness'. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  PITCH CHANGE, SONIFICATION, AND MUSICAL EXPERTISE: WHICH WAY IS UP? , 2002 .

[17]  Wolfgang Ellermeier,et al.  A reexamination of the frequency discrimination of random‐amplitude tones, and a test of Henning’s modified energy‐detector model , 1989 .

[18]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Associative strength theory of recognition memory for pitch , 1969 .

[19]  R. Freyman,et al.  A general equation describing frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C. Micheyl,et al.  Likelihood ratio, optimal decision rules, and correct response probabilities in a signal detection theoretic, equal-variance Gaussian model of the observer in the 4IAX paradigm , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  I. Peretz,et al.  What is specific to music processing? Insights from congenital amusia , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Intensity and frequency discrimination in one- and two-interval paradigms. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  N. Macmillan,et al.  The psychophysics of categorical perception. , 1977, Psychological review.