Relationship Between Early and Late Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia and Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial

Background—Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is common after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a marker of increased risk of arrhythmogenic death. However, the prognostic significance of NSVT when evaluated with other contemporary risk markers and at later time points after ACS remains uncertain. Methods and Results—In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, continuous ECGs were performed during the first 7 days after ACS (n=2866) and repeated for another 7 days at day 30 (n=1991). Median follow-up was 1 year. There was a time-varying interaction between NSVT and cardiovascular death such that NSVT was significantly associated with increased risk within the first 30 days after randomization (22/999 [2.2%] versus 16/1825 [0.9%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.39–5.79; P=0.004) but not after 30 days (28/929 [3.0%] versus 42/1734 [2.4%]; P=0.71). Detection of NSVT during the convalescent phase (n=428/1991; 21.5%) was also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, and was most marked within the first 2 months after detection (1.9% versus 0.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 5.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–28.20; P=0.01), and then decreasing over time such that the relationship was no longer significant by ≈5 months after ACS. Conclusions—NSVT occurred frequently during the acute and convalescent phases of ACS. The risk of cardiovascular death associated with NSVT was the greatest during the first 30 days after presentation; however, patients with NSVT detected during the convalescent phase were also at a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular death that persisted for an additional several months after the index event. Clinical Trial Registration—http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

[1]  C. Held,et al.  Causes of mortality with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes , 2014, Heart.

[2]  R. Califf,et al.  Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia and Ventricular Fibrillation Complicating Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2012, Circulation.

[3]  P. Pais,et al.  The incidence of bradyarrhythmias and clinical bradyarrhythmic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial: results of the continuous electrocardiographic assessment substudy. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Piccini,et al.  Relationship of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias to outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with varying underlying baseline risk. , 2011, American heart journal.

[5]  David A. Morrow,et al.  Relationship Between Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia After Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome and Sudden Cardiac Death: Observations From the Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 36 (MERLIN , 2010, Circulation.

[6]  A. Habets,et al.  Defibrillator implantation early after myocardial infarction. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Claes Held,et al.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Skene,et al.  Comparison of ticagrelor, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. , 2009, American heart journal.

[9]  Barry J Maron,et al.  American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Statement on Noninvasive Risk Stratification Techniques for Identifying Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  T. Young,et al.  Sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease: an American Heart Association/american College Of Cardiology Foundation Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research Professional Education Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke Council, and Coun , 2008, Circulation.

[11]  H. Huikuri,et al.  Prediction of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction: role of Holter monitoring in the modern treatment era. , 2005, European heart journal.

[12]  Eric Fain,et al.  Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Pekka Raatikainen,et al.  Prediction of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  R. Califf,et al.  Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes With No ST-Segment Elevation: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes , 2002, Circulation.

[15]  K. Lee,et al.  Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at risk for sudden death. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Ric,et al.  ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC TESTING TO IDENTIFY PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE WHO ARE AT RISK FOR SUDDEN DEATH , 2000 .

[17]  S. Hohnloser,et al.  Prevalence, characteristics and prognostic value during long-term follow-up of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  A. Kadish,et al.  Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: tachycardia characteristics and their prognostic implications. , 1998, Circulation.

[19]  A. Camm,et al.  Randomised trial of effect of amiodarone on mortality in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after recent myocardial infarction: EMIAT , 1997, The Lancet.

[20]  Bertram Pitt,et al.  Effect of d-sotalol on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after recent and remote myocardial infarction , 1996, The Lancet.

[21]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Ventricular Arrhythmias After Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Fibrinolytic Era GISSI‐2 Results , 1993, Circulation.

[22]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Effect of antiarrhythmic therapy on mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction with asymptomatic complex ventricular arrhythmias: Basel Antiarrhythmic Study of Infarct Survival (BASIS) , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  M. Weir,et al.  The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial Investigators: Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression After Myocardial Infarction. , 1990 .

[24]  W. Rogers,et al.  Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Prevalence, characteristics and significance of ventricular tachycardia detected by 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic recordings in the late hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  R. Peto,et al.  Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. , 1985, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.