The acquisition of recursive modification in NPs

Abstract:Despite sensitivity to the contextual demands of modification, children struggle with the production of complex NPs. What syntactic or semantic properties of NP embedding specifically introduce complexity? We compare production of definite descriptions with two modifiers that contrast in the attachment of the second modifier: sequential vs. recursive modification. Children (n = 71) produced overall fewer targets than adults (n = 13), but both groups found double nonrecursive modification (e.g. the plate with oranges under the table) much easier than recursive modification (e.g. the bird on the alligator in the water). We conclude that each embedding step introduces complexity beyond the elements and operations employed in the semantic composition of the structure, or the cyclic syntax that generates it.

[1]  E. McCready,et al.  Maximality and Plurality , 2005 .

[2]  Ž. Bošković Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis , 2014, Linguistic Inquiry.

[3]  Noam Chomsky Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[4]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Natural Languages , 1968 .

[5]  Thomas Roeper,et al.  The Acquisition of Recursion: How Formalism Articulates the Child’s Path , 2011, Biolinguistics.

[6]  J. Hintikka On denoting what? , 2005, Synthese.

[7]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Evidence of Perspective-Taking Constraints in Children's On-Line Reference Resolution , 2002, Psychological science.

[8]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[9]  A. Moro A closer look at the turtle's eyes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Wayne Cowart,et al.  What kind of thing is a coordinate , 2012 .

[11]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  How toddlers and preschoolers learn to uniquely identify referents for others: a training study. , 2007, Child development.

[12]  N. Friedmann,et al.  The child heard a coordinated sentence and wondered: On children's difficulty in understanding coordination and relative clauses with crossing dependencies , 2010 .

[13]  Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux,et al.  Elmo's Sister's Ball: The Problem of Acquiring Nominal Recursion , 2012 .

[14]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis , 2001 .

[15]  Andreas Trotzke,et al.  Syntactic complexity across interfaces , 2015 .

[16]  Andreas Trotzke,et al.  The complexity of narrow syntax : Minimalism, representational economy, and simplest Merge , 2014 .

[17]  Evan Kidd,et al.  Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: the role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery. , 2011, Journal of child language.

[18]  John McWhorter,et al.  Linguistic Simplicity and Complexity: Why Do Languages Undress? , 2011 .

[19]  Peter W. Culicover,et al.  The simpler syntax hypothesis , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Cristina Schmitt,et al.  Maximality and Plurality in Children’s Interpretation of Definites , 2006 .

[21]  Nelleke Strik,et al.  Scope-marking Strategies in the Acquisition of Long Distance wh-Questions in French and Dutch , 2008, Language and speech.

[22]  Wolfram Hinzen,et al.  The Philosophy of Universal Grammar , 2013 .

[23]  C. R.,et al.  On referring , 1950 .

[24]  L. Rizzi,et al.  Agreement configurations in language development : a movement-based complexity metric , 2014 .

[25]  Sarita L Eisenberg,et al.  Noun phrase elaboration in children's spoken stories. , 2008, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[26]  Paul Portner,et al.  Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings , 2002 .

[27]  D. Slobin The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .

[28]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[29]  Anna Maria Di Sciullo UG and External Systems: Language, brain and computation , 2005 .

[30]  T. Roeper,et al.  Recursion : complexity in cognition , 2014 .

[31]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  Recursion and human language , 2010 .

[32]  Floyd Merrell,et al.  Simplicity and complexity , 1998 .

[33]  Jonathan M. Campbell,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test , 2010 .

[34]  Eri Takahashi,et al.  BEYOND STATISTICAL LEARNING IN THE ACQUISITION OF PHRASE STRUCTURE , 2009 .

[35]  C. Chambers,et al.  Would a blue kite by any other name be just as blue? Effects of descriptive choices on subsequent referential behavior , 2014 .

[36]  Lois Bloom,et al.  One Word at a Time: The Use of Single Word Utterances Before Syntax , 1976 .

[37]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[38]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[39]  K. Hale,et al.  Ken Hale: A Life in Language , 2001 .

[40]  M. Tomasello,et al.  A New Look at the Acquisition of Relative Clauses , 2005 .

[41]  A. Belletti,et al.  Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies , 2009 .

[42]  Jongil Kwon,et al.  TOPICS IN THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS OF , 2009 .

[43]  Danielle E. Matthews,et al.  How do 3- and 5-year-olds respond to under- and over-informative utterances? , 2013 .

[44]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[45]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system: Building nominal constituents in homesign , 2012, Language.

[46]  V. Marchman,et al.  Grammar and the lexicon: developmental ordering in language acquisition. , 2007, Child development.

[47]  James Myers In search of grammar : experimental and corpus-based studies , 2012 .

[48]  Charles D. Yang Universal Grammar, statistics or both? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Napoleon Katsos,et al.  Are speakers and listeners ‘only moderately Gricean’? An empirical response to Engelhardt et al. (2006) , 2013 .

[50]  M. Oermann,et al.  [Clinical evaluation]. , 1981, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[51]  D. O'Neill,et al.  First Language , 2009 .

[52]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children , 2010 .

[53]  P. Lightbown,et al.  Structure and variation in child language. , 1975 .

[54]  D. Pesetsky,et al.  Pirahã Exceptionality: A Reassessment , 2009 .

[55]  Ljiljana Progovac,et al.  STRUCTURE FOR COORDINATION Part I , 1998 .

[56]  Maria Teresa Guasti,et al.  Interference in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions , 2011, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[57]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Pragmatic Versus Form-Based Accounts of Referential Contrast: Evidence for Effects of Informativity Expectations , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[58]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[59]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[60]  Wolfram Hinzen,et al.  On the Absence of X-within-X Recursion in Human Grammar , 2012, Linguistic Inquiry.

[61]  Cecile McKee,et al.  Children's sentence planning: Syntactic correlates of fluency variations* , 2009, Journal of Child Language.

[62]  T. Campbell,et al.  Nonword repetition and child language impairment. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[63]  David Lebeaux,et al.  Language acquisition and the form of the grammar , 2000 .

[64]  T. Mulvey A closer look , 2007, Nature.

[65]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Interfaces + Recursion = Language?: Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics , 2007 .

[66]  Charles Yang,et al.  The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language , 2016 .

[67]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type‐shifting Principles , 2008 .

[68]  David Barner,et al.  Acquiring the meaning of free relative clauses and plural definite descriptions , 2012, J. Semant..

[69]  A. Pérez-Leroux,et al.  The acquisition of mood selection in Spanish relative clauses , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[70]  A. Pérez-Leroux,et al.  Simplicity and complexity in child language and its explanation , 2011 .

[71]  Thomas Roeper,et al.  Language learnability and the forms of recursion , 2004 .

[72]  A. Pérez-Leroux,et al.  General and specific effects of lexicon in grammar: determiner and object pronoun omissions in child Spanish. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[73]  Chien Yu-Chin,et al.  Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics , 1990 .

[74]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Measuring Grammatical Complexity , 2014 .

[75]  Judith R. Johnston,et al.  Cognitive prerequisites: The evidence from children learning English. , 1985 .

[76]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[77]  Thomas Givon,et al.  The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution , 2009 .

[78]  青山 真二,et al.  アメリカ合衆国におけるKaufman Assessment Battery for Childrenに関する研究動向 , 1995 .

[79]  Noam Chomsky Approaching UG from Below , 2006 .

[80]  Bonnie Worth Johnson,et al.  A closer look at MLU: What does it really measure? , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[81]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Meaning and Context in Children's Understanding of Gradable Adjectives , 2010, J. Semant..

[82]  Peter W. Culicover,et al.  Grammar and Complexity: Language at the Intersection of Competence and Performance , 2013 .

[83]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[84]  N. Katsos,et al.  Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? , 2010 .

[85]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.