Molecular sieve membrane: supported metal-organic framework with high hydrogen selectivity.

Microporous membranes with pore apertures below the nanolevel can exhibit size selectivity by serving as a molecular sieve, which is promising for overcoming Robeson s “upperbound” limits in membrane-based gas separation. Zeolites, polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs), metal oxides, and active carbon are the typical materials used for this purpose. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted much research interest in recent years, and are emerging as a new family of molecular sieves. MOFs are novel porous crystalline materials consisting of metal ions or clusters interconnected by a variety of organic linkers. In addition to promising applications in adsorptive gas separation and storage or in catalysis, their unique properties, such as their highly diversified structures, large range in pore sizes, very high surface areas, and specific adsorption affinities, make MOFs excellent candidates for use in the construction of molecular sieve membranes with superior performance. The preparation of MOF membranes for gas separation is rapidly becoming a research focus. A number of attempts have been made to prepare supported-MOF membranes; however, progress is very limited and so far there are only very few reports of continuous MOF films on porous supports being used as separating membranes. Recently, Guo et al. reported a copper-net-supported HKUST-1 (Cu3(BTC)2; BTC= benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate) membrane exhibiting a H2/N2 selectivity of 7 [13] (separation factor of H2 over N2 is calculated as the permeate-to-retentate composition ratio of H2, divided by the same ratio for N2 as proposed by IUPAC) ; this is the first MOF membrane to show gasseparation performance beyond Knudsen diffusion behavior. Very recently, Ranjan and Tsapatsis prepared a microporous metal–organic framework [MMOF, Cu(hfipbb)(H2hfipbb)0.5; hfipbb= 4,4’-(hexafluoroisopropylidene)bis(benzoic acid)] membrane by seeded growth on an alumina support. The ideal selectivity for H2/N2, based on single permeation tests, was 23 at 190 8C. This higher selectivity, compared to the report from Guo et al., might be a result of the smaller effective pore size (ca. 0.32 nm of MMOF versus 0.9 nm of HKUTS-1), which results in a relatively low H2 permeance of this MMOF membrane (10 9 molm 2 s Pa 1 at 190 8C). The authors attributed this finding to the blockage of the onedimensional (1D) straight-pore channels in the membrane. Therefore, with regard to H2 separation, small-pore MOFs having three-dimensional (3D) channel structures are considered to be ideal membrane materials. Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), a subfamily of MOFs, consist of transition metals (Zn, Co) and imidazolate linkers which form 3D tetrahedral frameworks and frequently resemble zeolite topologies. A number of ZIFs exhibit exceptional thermal and chemical stability. Another important feature of ZIFs is their hydrophobic surfaces, which give ZIF membranes certain advantages over zeolite membranes and sol–gel-derived silica membranes in the separation of H2 in the presence of steam. Very recently we reported the first result from permeation measurements on a ZIF-8 membrane. The ZIF-8 membrane showed a H2/CH4 separation factor greater than 10. Whereas the ZIF-8 pores (0.34 nm) are slightly larger than the kinetic diameter of CO2 (0.33 nm), and are very flexible, the H2/CO2 separation on this ZIF-8 membrane showed Knudsen selectivity. In the current work, we therefore chose ZIF-7 as a promising candidate for the development of a H2-selective membrane to satisfy the above requirements. ZIF-7 (Zn(bim)2) is formed by bridging benzimidazolate (bim) anions and zinc cations with soladite (SOD) topology. The pore size of ZIF-7 (the hexagonal window size in the SOD cage) estimated from crystallographic data is about 0.3 nm, which is just in between the size of H2 (0.29 nm) and CO2 (0.33 nm). We could therefore expect a ZIF-7 membrane to achieve a high selectivity of H2 over CO2 and other gases through a molecular sieving effect. In many cases, it was reported that the heterogeneous nucleation density of MOF crystals on ceramic supports is very low, 14] which makes it extremely difficult to prepare supported-MOF membranes by an in situ synthesis route. Chemical modifications of substrate surfaces have been proposed to direct the nucleation and orientation of the deposited MOF layers. Based on our knowledge in the development of zeolite membranes, we adopted a seeded secondary growth method for the ZIF-7 membrane prepara[*] Prof. Dr. Y.-S. Li, F.-Y. Liang, H. Bux, A. Feldhoff, Prof. Dr. J. Caro Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry and the Laboratory for Nano and Quantum Engineering (LNQE) in cooperation with the Center for Solid State Research and New Materials, Leibniz Universit t Hannover Callinstrasse 3A, 30167 Hannover (Germany) Fax: (+49)511-762-19121 E-mail: yanshuo.li@pci.uni-hannover.de juergen.caro@pci.uni-hannover.de

[1]  O. Shekhah,et al.  Thin films of metal-organic frameworks. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[2]  M. O'Keeffe Design of MOFs and intellectual content in reticular chemistry: a personal view. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[3]  Xiao-Ming Chen,et al.  Ligand-directed strategy for zeolite-type metal-organic frameworks: zinc(II) imidazolates with unusual zeolitic topologies. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[4]  T. Bein,et al.  Oriented growth of the metal organic framework Cu(3)(BTC)(2)(H(2)O)(3).xH(2)O tunable with functionalized self-assembled monolayers. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  W. Koros,et al.  Terminology for membranes and membrane processes (IUPAC Recommendations 1996) , 1996 .

[6]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Hierarchische Nanofertigung: von geformten Zeolithnanopartikeln zu hochleistungsfähigen Trennmembranen , 2007 .

[7]  Jie‐Peng Zhang,et al.  [Zn(bim)2] · (H2O)1.67: A metal-organic open-framework with sodalite topology , 2003 .

[8]  S. Qiu,et al.  "Twin copper source" growth of metal-organic framework membrane: Cu(3)(BTC)(2) with high permeability and selectivity for recycling H(2). , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  C. Wöll,et al.  Selective nucleation and growth of metal-organic open framework thin films on patterned COOH/CF3-terminated self-assembled monolayers on Au(111). , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  Yuehe Lin,et al.  MICROPOROUS INORGANIC MEMBRANES , 2000 .

[11]  D. Olson,et al.  Separation of hydrocarbons with a microporous metal-organic framework. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[12]  Z. Lai,et al.  Fabrication of MOF-5 membranes using microwave-induced rapid seeding and solvothermal secondary growth , 2009 .

[13]  Hae‐Kwon Jeong,et al.  Rapid fabrication of metal organic framework thin films using microwave-induced thermal deposition. , 2008, Chemical communications.

[14]  Susumu Kitagawa,et al.  Functional porous coordination polymers. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  Yingchun Liu,et al.  Adsorption sites of hydrogen in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[16]  J. Caro,et al.  Zeolite membranes – Recent developments and progress , 2008 .

[17]  Y. S. Lin,et al.  Gas permeation through DDR‐type zeolite membranes at high temperatures , 2008 .

[18]  L. Robeson,et al.  The upper bound revisited , 2008 .

[19]  S. Kitagawa,et al.  Funktionale poröse Koordinationspolymere , 2004 .

[20]  J. Falconer,et al.  Modification of Zeolite Membranes for H2 Separation by Catalytic Cracking of Methyldiethoxysilane , 2005 .

[21]  F. Kapteijn,et al.  Manufacture of dense coatings of Cu3(BTC)2 (HKUST-1) on α-alumina , 2008 .

[22]  G. Shi,et al.  Template-free electrosynthesis of aligned poly(p-phenylene) microtubules , 2003 .

[23]  M. Snyder,et al.  Hierarchical nanomanufacturing: from shaped zeolite nanoparticles to high-performance separation membranes. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[24]  Dunyi Liu,et al.  Paleoproterozoic lower crust beneath Nushan in Anhui Province: Evidence from zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating on granulite xenoliths in Cenozoic alkali basalt , 2003 .

[25]  R. Ranjan,et al.  Microporous Metal Organic Framework Membrane on Porous Support Using the Seeded Growth Method , 2009 .

[26]  Stuart L James,et al.  Metal-organic frameworks. , 2003, Chemical Society reviews.

[27]  Michael O'Keeffe,et al.  Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials , 2003, Nature.

[28]  Yanshuo Li,et al.  Microwave synthesis of zeolite membranes : A review , 2008 .

[29]  Deborah J. Jones,et al.  Oriented Crystallisation on Supports and Anisotropic Mass Transport of the Metal‐Organic Framework Manganese Formate , 2007 .

[30]  Gérard Férey,et al.  Hybrid porous solids: past, present, future. , 2008, Chemical Society reviews.

[31]  L. Robeson,et al.  Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes , 1991 .

[32]  A. Feldhoff,et al.  Rapid Room-Temperature Synthesis and Characterization of Nanocrystals of a Prototypical Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework , 2009 .

[33]  Easir A Khan,et al.  Synthesis of continuous MOF-5 membranes on porous α-alumina substrates , 2009 .

[34]  Hong-Cai Zhou,et al.  Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[35]  Michael O’Keeffe,et al.  Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  V. Kislenko,et al.  Complex formation of polyethyleneimine with copper(II), nickel(II), and cobalt(II) ions , 2002 .