Methodology of the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference

OBJECTIVES This article describes the methodology used for The Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2). The PALLIC-2 sought to develop evidence-based clinical recommendations and when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements and research priorities for the diagnosis and management of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). DATA SOURCES Electronic searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from 2012 to March 2022. STUDY SELECTION Content was divided into 11 sections related to PARDS, with abstract and full text screening followed by data extraction for studies which met inclusion with no exclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION We used a standardized data extraction form to construct evidence tables, grade the evidence, and formulate recommendations or statements using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. DATA SYNTHESIS This consensus conference was comprised of a multidisciplinary group of international experts in pediatric critical care, pulmonology, respiratory care, and implementation science which followed standards set by the Institute of Medicine, using the GRADE system and Research And Development/University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness method, modeled after PALICC 2015. The panel of 52 content and four methodology experts had several web-based meetings over the course of 2 years. We conducted seven systematic reviews and four scoping reviews to cover the 11 topic areas. Dissemination was via primary publication listing all statements and separate supplemental publications for each subtopic that include supporting arguments for each recommendation and statement. CONCLUSIONS A consensus conference of experts from around the world developed recommendations and consensus statements for the definition and management of PARDS and identified evidence gaps which need further research.

[1]  A. Randolph,et al.  Pulmonary Specific Ancillary Treatment for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference , 2023, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[2]  Ryan P. Barbaro,et al.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. , 2023, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[3]  N. Iyer,et al.  Noninvasive Respiratory Support for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference , 2023, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[4]  M. Dahmer,et al.  Pathobiology, Severity, and Risk Stratification of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference , 2023, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[5]  N. Yehya,et al.  Definition, Incidence, and Epidemiology of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference , 2023, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[6]  W. Brunow de Carvalho,et al.  Diagnostic, Management, and Research Considerations for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Resource-Limited Settings: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference , 2023, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[7]  F. Baudin,et al.  Monitoring in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference , 2023, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[8]  I. Cheifetz,et al.  Invasive Ventilatory Support in Patients With Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference , 2023, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[9]  V. Nadkarni,et al.  Nonpulmonary Treatments for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference , 2023, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[10]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  Summaries of harms in systematic reviews are unreliable Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms , 2021, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Informing Healthcare Decisions with Observational Research Assessing Causal Effect. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement , 2021, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[12]  R. Berg,et al.  A Core Outcome Set for Pediatric Critical Care. , 2020, Critical care medicine.

[13]  Natalie S Blencowe,et al.  RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2019, BMJ.

[14]  Zachary Munn,et al.  Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach , 2018, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[15]  J. McGowan,et al.  PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation , 2018, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A scoping review and survey provides the rationale, perceptions, and preferences for the integration of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses and GRADE assessments. , 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  M. Hernán,et al.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[19]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[20]  N. Thomas,et al.  Methodology of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference , 2015, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[21]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Guideline panels should not GRADE good practice statements. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Non‐randomized studies as a source of complementary, sequential or replacement evidence for randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions , 2013, Research synthesis methods.

[24]  Elie A Akl,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users: R as a Computational Back-End , 2012 .

[26]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome The Berlin Definition , 2012 .

[27]  M. Curley,et al.  Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Consensus Recommendations From the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference* , 2015, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[28]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[30]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GrADe : what is “ quality of evidence ” and why is it important to clinicians ? rATING quALITY of evIDeNCe AND STreNGTH of reCommeNDATIoNS , 2022 .

[31]  Michael K Gould,et al.  An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[32]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  M. Lamy,et al.  The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[34]  Byuh Ree Kim,et al.  소아 급성호흡곤란증후군에서 Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference 정의의 임상적 적용 , 2019 .

[35]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.