The Learning Curve of Pedicle Screw Placement: How Many Screws Are Enough?

Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. Assess the learning curve of pedicle screw (PS) placement of a Spinal Surgery Fellow (SSF) with no previous experience with the technique. Summary of Background Data. Recent studies have attempted to identify the learning curve for different surgical procedures to define training requirements. Several authors have described a learning curve for PS placement. However, no one has defined the number of PS necessary to be competent in this skill. Methods. All patients who had PS inserted by the SSF under the supervision of an Attending Spinal Consultant (ASC) and had adequate postoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans available, were included in this study. PS position was assessed by 2 blinded independent observers using a grading scale. PS placement by the SSF was evaluated by examining the assessed position in chronological groups of 40 screws. Results. Ninety-four patients underwent internal fixation of the spine with 582 PS. Eight cases (40 screws) were excluded because of lack of imaging studies. Of the 542 screws under evaluation, 320 (59%) were performed by the SSF, 187 (34.5%) by the ASC, and 35 (6.5%) by advanced orthopedic or neurosurgical trainees. The rate of misplaced PS performed by the SSF for the first 80 PS was 12.5% and dropped to 3.4% for the remaining 240 screws, which is a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01). Evaluation of computed tomography of vertebrae with PS placed by the SSF on one side and by the ASC on the other showed that the ASC achieved better placement during the first 80 PS (P < 0.01). However, this difference disappeared in the last 240 (P = 1.00). Conclusion. The findings demonstrate a learning curve for PS placement. In this series, the asymptote for this technique for an inexperienced SSF, started after about 80 screws (approximately 25 cases).

[1]  K. White,et al.  Pullout Strength of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: Comparison of the Transpedicular and Extrapedicular Techniques , 2006, Spine.

[2]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic Considerations of Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic Spine: Roy‐Camille Technique Versus Open‐Lamina Technique , 1998, Spine.

[3]  A. Dhawan,et al.  In Vivo Accuracy of Thoracic Pedicle Screws , 2001, Spine.

[4]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo , 1990, Spine.

[5]  M H Krag,et al.  Hole Preparation Techniques for Transpedicle Screws Effect on Pull‐Out Strength from Human Cadaveric Vertebrae , 1991, Spine.

[6]  R. Lehman,et al.  Anatomy and biomechanics of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation , 2004 .

[7]  H. Halm,et al.  Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis. , 2000, Spine.

[8]  Y. Rampersaud,et al.  Clinical Accuracy of Fluoroscopic Computer-Assisted Pedicle Screw Fixation: A CT Analysis , 2005, Spine.

[9]  A. Jayaswal,et al.  Outcome-Based Classification for Assessment of Thoracic Pedicular Screw Placement , 2008, Spine.

[10]  Constantin Schizas,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy: A Meta-analysis , 2007, Spine.

[11]  D. Polly,et al.  Volumetric Spinal Canal Intrusion: A Comparison Between Thoracic Pedicle Screws and Thoracic Hooks , 2004, Spine.

[12]  D. Simon,et al.  Accuracy Requirements for Image-Guided Spinal Pedicle Screw Placement , 2001, Spine.

[13]  A. Agresti An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[14]  D. Polly,et al.  Accuracy of Thoracic Pedicle Screws in Patients with and Without Coronal Plane Spinal Deformities , 2002, Spine.

[15]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  Skill acquisition: History, questions, and theories , 2005 .

[16]  J. Hiatt,et al.  The laparoscopic learning curve. , 1995, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[17]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.

[18]  D. Graeb,et al.  Accuracy and safety of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic spine trauma. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[19]  G. Rao,et al.  Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of Computed Tomography in Assessment of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement , 2003, Spine.

[20]  W. Castro,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae , 1996, Spine.

[21]  J. Stambough Lumbosacral instrumented fusion: analysis of 124 consecutive cases. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[22]  U Liljenqvist,et al.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[23]  Imaging Assessment of Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement: Sensitivity and Specificity of Plain Radiographs and Computer Axial Tomography , 2007, Spine.

[24]  S. C. Açıkbaş,et al.  The effect of transpedicular screw misplacement on late spinal stability , 2003, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[25]  Ganesh Rao,et al.  Comparison of computerized tomography and direct visualization in thoracic pedicle screw placement. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[26]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Multidirectional Instability of the Thoracic Spine Due to Iatrogenic Pedicle Injuries During Transpedicular Fixation: A Biomechanical Investigation , 1997, Spine.

[27]  A G Patwardhan,et al.  Analysis of the Morphometric Characteristics of the Thoracic and Lumbar Pedicles , 1987, Spine.

[28]  K. Shea,et al.  Defining the Pediatric Spinal Thoracoscopy Learning Curve: Sixty-Five Consecutive Cases , 2000, Spine.

[29]  A. Nowitzke Assessment of the Learning Curve for Lumbar Microendoscopic Discectomy , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[30]  Amir H Fayyazi,et al.  Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Assessing Thoracic Pedicle Screw Malposition , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.