SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND COMPONENT DESIGN OF REFINERY PIPING SYSTEMS

In petroleum industries, especially in refineries installations, hundreds of miles of pipes are installed to transfer row and refined material (fluid and gas) from a point to another of the plant, connecting all the components involved in the transformation process (tanks, distillations columns, furnaces, etc..).Recent seismic events showed a quite high vulnerability of these structures, where damage ranges from the simple failure of joints to the failure of supporting structures. For these reasons, initially the seismic analysis and component design of refinery piping systems is here analysed. A review of the current approaches imposed by European (EN13480:3) and American (ASME B31.3) standards is illustrated by using a proper case study of a piping system on a pipe-rack. The analysis permitted to identify the limits of the design standards and to identify the critical aspects of the problem, i.e., dynamic interaction between pipes and rack, correct definition of the response factor, strain versus stress approach. Finally, the preliminary phases of an experimental investigation on flanged joints are also illustrated. Fabrizio Paolacci, Md. Shahin Reza and Oreste S. Bursi 2

[1]  Hiroe Kobayashi,et al.  Dynamic response of piping system on rack structure with gaps and frictions , 1989 .

[2]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Seismic Performance of Industrial Facilities Affected by the 1999 Turkey Earthquake , 2006 .

[3]  Kohei Suzuki,et al.  Earthquake Damage to Industrial Facilities and Development of Seismic and Vibration Control Technology – Based on Experience from the 1995 Kobe (Hanshin-Awaji) Earthquake – , 2006 .

[4]  David Nash,et al.  Combined external load tests for standard and compact flanges , 2000 .

[5]  G. Antaki,et al.  Seismic design and retrofit of piping systems , 2002 .

[6]  Xxyyzz,et al.  Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems , 1984 .

[7]  Mahmood Hosseini,et al.  A Verification Study of ASCE Recommended Guidelines for Seismic Evaluation and Design of Combination Structures in Petrochemical Facilities , 2009 .

[8]  Ayman Saudy Seismic analysis of multiply-supported MDOF secondary systems , 1992 .

[9]  Sassan Eshghi,et al.  THE BEHAVIOR OF SPECIAL STRUCTURES DURING THE BAM EARTHQUAKE OF 26 DECEMBER 2003 , 2004 .

[10]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis , 2010 .

[11]  Ricardo A. Burdisso,et al.  Multiply supported secondary systems part I: Response spectrum analysis , 1987 .

[12]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Floor response spectrum method for seismic analysis of multiply supported secondary systems , 1986 .

[13]  William H. Semke,et al.  Efficient dynamic structural response modelling of bolted flange piping systems , 2006 .

[14]  Ayman M. Okeil,et al.  Effects of ductility on seismic response of piping systems and their implication on design and qualification , 1996 .

[15]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Seismic demands on secondary systems in base‐isolated nuclear power plants , 2007 .

[16]  P. Sollogoub,et al.  Seismic behaviour of piping systems with and without defects: experimental and numerical evaluations , 1999 .

[17]  P. Sollogoub,et al.  Enhanced seismic criteria for piping , 2006 .

[18]  Ajaya K. Gupta,et al.  A new instructure response spectrum (IRS) method for multiply connected secondary systems with coupling effects , 1986 .

[19]  Bing Liu,et al.  Strain-based design criteria of pipelines , 2009 .