Order and Disorder in Product Innovation Models

This article argues that the conceptual development of product innovation models goes hand in hand with paradigmatic changes in the field of organization science. Remarkable similarities in the change of organizational perspectives and product innovation models are noticeable. To illustrate how changes in the organizational paradigm are being translated into changes in new product development (NPD) practices, five NPD models are presented: the sequential, compression, flexible, integrative and improvisational models. The evolution of product innovation management shows a move from planned and mechanistic, towards emergent and organic models. Such a process of re-orientation poses several challenges that are presented in the form of six propositions: from universal to contingent models, from invariant to flexible practices, from avoiding risks to taking advantage of opportunities, from planning to learning, from exclusive teams to inclusive networks, from structure to structured chaos.

[1]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Cross-Functional Dynamics in New Product Development , 2000 .

[2]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 1997 .

[3]  J. Lyneis,et al.  The dynamics of project performance: benchmarking the drivers of cost and schedule overrun , 1999 .

[4]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[5]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  The new corporate architecture , 1995 .

[6]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[7]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Managing the new product development process , 1985 .

[8]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[9]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Switching Cognitive Gears: From Habits of Mind to Active Thinking , 1991 .

[10]  Jos‚Äö Fonseca,et al.  Complexity and Innovation in Organizations , 2001 .

[11]  David Robertson,et al.  Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry , 1992 .

[12]  E. Trist,et al.  The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments , 1965 .

[13]  Bank Marketing Management , 1984 .

[14]  M. Iansiti,et al.  Developing products on Internet time. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[15]  R. Schmenner,et al.  Collapsing new product development times: Six case studies , 1992 .

[16]  S. Thomke,et al.  Agile Product Development: Managing Development Flexibility in Uncertain Environments , 1998 .

[17]  R. H. Connery,et al.  Processes of organization and management , 1948 .

[18]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[19]  Tasadduq A. Shervani,et al.  The albatross of product innovation , 1997 .

[20]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives , 1998 .

[21]  D. Deschoolmeester,et al.  R&D-marketing integration mechanisms, communication flows, and innovation success , 1994 .

[22]  R. Stacey The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes , 1995 .

[23]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[24]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Debating organization : point-counterpoint in organization studies , 2003 .

[25]  S. Clegg,et al.  Management Paradoxes: A Relational View , 2002 .

[26]  I. Nonaka Creating Organizational Order Out of Chaos: Self-Renewal in Japanese Firms , 1988 .

[27]  Massimo Scanziani,et al.  Competing on the edge , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[29]  Joseph J. Giglierano,et al.  Missing the Boat and Sinking the Boat: A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurial Risk , 1986 .

[30]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  THE DOMINANT LOGIC: RETROSPECTIVE AND EXTENSION , 1995 .

[31]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[32]  R. P. Hardingham A simple model approach to multi‐project monitoring , 1970 .

[33]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[34]  Adler,et al.  Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system , 1999 .

[35]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Managing New Product and Process Development: Text and Cases , 1992 .

[36]  J. Gomesa,et al.  Is more always better ? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development , 2003 .

[37]  S. Sitkin Learning Through Failure : The Strategy of Small Losses , 1992 .

[38]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[39]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[40]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .

[41]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[42]  Scott Edgett,et al.  The Traits of Successful New Service Development , 1994 .

[43]  V. Mahajan,et al.  New Product Development Process: A Perspective for Reexamination , 1988 .

[44]  Neil F. Johnson,et al.  The science of complexity , 2002 .

[45]  Yehouda Shenhav,et al.  Manufacturing Rationality: The Engineering Foundations of the Managerial Revolution , 1999 .

[46]  M. Iansiti Shooting the Rapids: Managing Product Development in Turbulent Environments , 1995 .

[47]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[48]  M. Cunha,et al.  Organizational improvisation: what, when, how, and why , 1999 .

[49]  Paul A. Emmanuelides,et al.  Towards an integrative framework of performance in product development projects , 1993 .

[50]  H. Ernst Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the Empirical Literature , 2002 .

[51]  Eric Abrahamson Disorganization theory and disorganizational behavior: Towards an etiology of messes , 2002 .

[52]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Learning: A Field Study , 2001 .

[53]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Editorial: Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 1997 .

[54]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The new product process: A decision guide for management , 1988 .

[55]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[56]  John Preston,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1988 .

[57]  J. Gupta,et al.  Creating Knowledge Based Organizations , 2003 .

[58]  Robert Garfinkel,et al.  Introduction: Jazz Improvisation As a Metaphor for Organization Theory , 1998 .

[59]  Jan Jorgensen,et al.  Some surprising things about collaboration—Knowing how people connect makes it work better , 1996 .

[60]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[61]  Ken Kamoche,et al.  Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisation to Product Innovation , 2001 .

[62]  R. Cooper Third‐Generation New Product Processes , 1994 .

[63]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[64]  J. Farley,et al.  Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis , 1993 .

[65]  Rosa Oppenheim,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1990 .