Temporal integration of vowel periodicity in the auditory cortex.

Cortical sensitivity to the periodicity of speech sounds has been evidenced by larger, more anterior responses to periodic than to aperiodic vowels in several non-invasive studies of the human brain. The current study investigated the temporal integration underlying the cortical sensitivity to speech periodicity by studying the increase in periodicity-specific cortical activation with growing stimulus duration. Periodicity-specific activation was estimated from magnetoencephalography as the differences between the N1m responses elicited by periodic and aperiodic vowel stimuli. The duration of the vowel stimuli with a fundamental frequency (F0=106 Hz) representative of typical male speech was varied in units corresponding to the vowel fundamental period (9.4 ms) and ranged from one to ten units. Cortical sensitivity to speech periodicity, as reflected by larger and more anterior responses to periodic than to aperiodic stimuli, was observed when stimulus duration was 3 cycles or more. Further, for stimulus durations of 5 cycles and above, response latency was shorter for the periodic than for the aperiodic stimuli. Together the current results define a temporal window of integration for the periodicity of speech sounds in the F0 range of typical male speech. The length of this window is 3-5 cycles, or 30-50 ms.

[1]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Locating the initial stages of speech–sound processing in human temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  Yoshiharu Soeta,et al.  Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to iterated rippled noise , 2005, Hearing Research.

[3]  P. Alku,et al.  A method for generating natural-sounding speech stimuli for cognitive brain research , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Sustained Magnetic Fields Reveal Separate Sites for Sound Level and Temporal Regularity in Human Auditory Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  L. Wiegrebe,et al.  Searching for the time constant of neural pitch extraction. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Patterson,et al.  The effect of temporal context on the sustained pitch response in human auditory cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: Hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.

[8]  Elvira Brattico,et al.  Orderly cortical representation of vowel categories presented by multiple exemplars. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  B C Moore,et al.  Psychoacoustic consequences of compression in the peripheral auditory system. , 1998, Psychological review.

[10]  Claude Alain,et al.  Neural encoding of sound duration persists in older adults , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Depth electrode recordings show double dissociation between pitch processing in lateral Heschl’s gyrus and sound onset processing in medial Heschl’s gyrus , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  B Lütkenhöner,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  K. Kaga,et al.  A magnetoencephalographic study of Japanese vowel processing , 2006, Neuroreport.

[14]  Sensitivity of human auditory evoked potentials to the harmonicity of complex tones: evidence for dissociated cortical processes of spectral and periodicity analysis , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  M. Florentine,et al.  Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  K. Saberi,et al.  Cognitive restoration of reversed speech , 1999, Nature.

[17]  K. Palomäki,et al.  The periodic structure of vowel sounds is reflected in human electromagnetic brain responses , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  G. Weismer,et al.  The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The stimulus duration required to identify vowels, their octave, and their pitch chroma , 1995 .

[20]  R. Patterson,et al.  The Duration Required to Identify the Instrument, the Octave, or the Pitch Chroma of a Musical Note , 1995 .

[21]  André Rupp,et al.  Neuromagnetic responses reflect the temporal pitch change of regular interval sounds , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  D. Woods,et al.  Activation of duration-sensitive auditory cortical fields in humans. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  T H Crystal,et al.  Segmental durations in connected speech signals: preliminary results. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Paavo Alku,et al.  The auditory N1m reveals the left-hemispheric representation of vowel identity in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  H. Davis,et al.  Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Claude Alain,et al.  Aging and the processing of sound duration in human auditory cortex , 2003, Hearing Research.

[27]  H. Tiitinen,et al.  Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Nicole M. Gage,et al.  Temporal integration: reflections in the M100 of the auditory evoked field , 2000, Neuroreport.

[29]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Cortical sensitivity to periodicity of speech sounds. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Representation of the vocal roughness of aperiodic speech sounds in the auditory cortex. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[32]  Stefan Uppenkamp,et al.  Temporal dynamics of pitch in human auditory cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[33]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  Piano tones evoke stronger magnetic fields than pure tones or noise, both in musicians and non-musicians , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[35]  Yoshiharu Soeta,et al.  The effects of pitch and pitch strength on an auditory-evoked N1m , 2008, Neuroreport.

[36]  K Mathiak,et al.  Differential impact of periodic and aperiodic speech‐like acoustic signals on magnetic M50/M100 fields , 2000, Neuroreport.

[37]  R Hari,et al.  Cerebral magnetic responses to noise bursts and pauses of different durations. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[38]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[39]  R. Peters,et al.  Threshold Duration for Melodic Pitch , 1983 .