Out of Mind, Out of Sight

Mind wandering, in which cognitive processing of the external environment decreases in favor of internal processing (Small-wood & Schooler, 2006), has been consistently associated with errors on tasks requiring sustained attention and continu-ous stimulus monitoring (e.g., Cheyne, Carriere, & Smilek, 2006; Robertson, Manly, Andrade, Baddeley, & Yiend, 1997; Smallwood et al., 2004). Consistent with this finding, recent neuroimaging studies suggest that mind wandering engages the default neural network (Christoff, Gordon, Smallwood, Smith, & Schooler, 2009; Mason et al., 2007; Smallwood, Beach, Schooler, & Handy, 2008; Weissman, Roberts, Viss-cher, & Woldorff, 2006) and is associated with decreased neu-ral analysis of incoming information (Christoff et al., 2009; Smallwood, Beach, et al., 2008; Weissman et al., 2006). Here, we propose that mind wandering also involves overt embodied components whereby external input is blocked at the sensory endings. We demonstrate that during an extended period of reading, episodes of mind wandering, compared with on-task periods, contain more eye closures (blinks) and fewer fixa-tions on the text―even as subjects continue to scan the text.The present investigation is based on the idea that blink rate might serve to modulate trade-offs between attention to mind-wandering thoughts and to external task-related stimuli. Blinks reduce processing of external stimuli in two ways―by physi-cally closing the eyelid and by generating cortical suppression of visual processing both before and after the time of actual lid closure (Bristow, Frith, & Rees, 2005; Bristow, Haynes, Syl-vester, Frith, & Rees, 2005; Ridder & Tomlinson, 1997; Volk-mann, 1986). Increasing the rate of such visual interruptions may facilitate a shift in the balance of processing from exter-nal stimuli to internal thoughts. Consistent with these consid-erations, evidence suggests that an increase in eye blinks is associated with errors in vigilance to external stimuli (Papadelis et al., 2007; Poulton & Gregory, 1952; Van Orden, Jung, & Makeig, 2000) and with conflict between internal and external workload (Recarte, Perez, Conchillo, & Nunes, 2008).To assess the relation between eye blinks and mind wandering, we compared blink rates during probe-caught epi-sodes of mind wandering and on-task periods of reading. Mind-wandering episodes during reading are relatively fre-quent; everyone has experienced interfering thoughts that compromise reading (Reichle, Reineberg, & Schooler, in press; Schooler, Reichle, & Halpern, 2004; Smallwood, McSpadden, & Schooler, 2008), and it is possible to even find oneself at the end of a page with no recollection of having processed the material just “read.” Such

[1]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[2]  Chrysoula Kourtidou-Papadeli,et al.  Monitoring sleepiness with on-board electrophysiological recordings for preventing sleep-deprived traffic accidents , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Going AWOL in the Brain: Mind Wandering Reduces Cortical Analysis of External Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Eye and Head Turning Indicates Cerebral Lateralization , 1972, Science.

[5]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  A comparison of saccadic and blink suppression in normal observers , 1997, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The restless mind. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Two distinct neural effects of blinking on human visual processing , 2005, NeuroImage.

[9]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Lost in the Sauce , 2009, Psychological science.

[10]  Christopher Martyn,et al.  A Short History of Nearly Everything , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  D. Levin.  Thinking and seeing : visual metacognition in adults and children , 2004 .

[12]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Zoning Out while Reading: Evidence for Dissociations between Experience and Metaconsciousness. , 2004 .

[13]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Blinking Suppresses the Neural Response to Unchanging Retinal Stimulation , 2005, Current Biology.

[14]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[15]  T. Boult,et al.  The eyes have it , 2003, WBMA '03.

[16]  J. Smallwood,et al.  When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye Movements During Mindless Reading , 2010, Psychological science.

[18]  T. Jung,et al.  Combined eye activity measures accurately estimate changes in sustained visual task performance , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[19]  L. Giambra,et al.  Task-Unrelated Images and Thoughts While Reading , 1989 .

[20]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  R. K. Simpson.  Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .

[22]  R. Gregory,et al.  Blinking during Visual Tracking , 1952 .

[23]  F. C. Volkmann.  Human visual suppression , 1986, Vision Research.

[24]  I. Robertson,et al.  `Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  K. Christoff,et al.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Mental Workload and Visual Impairment: Differences between Pupil, Blink, and Subjective Rating , 2008, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.