Strike feeding behavior in the muskellunge, Esox masquinongy: contributions of the lateral line and visual sensory systems.

The muskellunge, Esox masquinongy, is a predatory esocid fish with well-developed visual and lateral line systems. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative roles of these two sensory modalities in organizing the strike behavior of the animal. Subadult muskellunge were videotaped in a test arena while feeding on fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Animals were tested under five conditions: (i) control animals in which the visual and lateral line systems were intact; (ii) animals with lateral line afference suppressed by immersion for 12-24 h in 0.1 mmol l(-1) CoCl2; (iii) animals blinded by bilateral optic nerve transection; (iv) animals that had been unilaterally blinded; and (v) animals in which the lateral line system had been unilaterally denervated. The feeding behavior of the muskellunge consists of two phases: a slow stalk of the prey with minimal body movement followed by an explosive C- or S-start lunge at the prey. Quantitative comparisons of animals in the five test groups indicate that, although vision is used in the initial acquisition of the prey, both vision and the lateral line system play important roles in determining the initiation of the rapid strike. The lateral line system may play a critical role in the final capture of the prey at the end of the strike. In addition, lateral-line-suppressed muskellunge strongly alter their approaches to more distant prey. Bilaterally blinded muskellunge do not stalk their prey, but will lunge only at prey that are at close range. Unilaterally blinded or denervated muskellunge also alter their detection of and approach to prey, attending to a wider region of the intact sensory hemisphere. Our data suggest not only that the visual and lateral line systems play complementary roles in the feeding behavior sequence but also that each system plays a more or less dominant role during consecutive phases of the behavior.

[1]  D. Bellwood,et al.  Visual acuity and feeding in larval Premnas biaculeatus , 1996 .

[2]  J. Janssen,et al.  Lateral line stimuli can override vision to determine sunfish strike trajectory. , 1993, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  J. Janssen,et al.  Comparison of response distance to prey via the lateral line in the ruffe and yellow perch , 1997 .

[4]  M. Lemire,et al.  A radioautographic study of the visual system in fresh water teleosts following intraocular injection of tritiated fucose and proline , 1976, Brain Research.

[5]  G. Emde,et al.  Finding food: senses involved in foraging for insect larvae in the electric fish gnathonemus petersii , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  G. Lauder SHORT COMMUNICATION AQUATIC PREY CAPTURE IN FISHES: EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL APPROACHES , 1986 .

[7]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Dipole source localization by the mottled sculpin II. The role of lateral line excitation patterns , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Behavioral Investigations on the Functions of the Lateral Line and Inner Ear in Predation , 1989 .

[9]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Field and laboratory studies of the feeding behaviour of the piper Hyporhamphus ihi with reference to the role of the lateral line in feeding , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[10]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Functional morphology of the piper Hyporhamphus ihi with reference to the role of the lateral line in feeding , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Dipole source localization by mottled sculpin. I. Approach strategies , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  J. Montgomery,et al.  The lateral line can mediate rheotaxis in fish , 1997, Nature.

[13]  '. DAVIDM.RAND Prey capture in the chain pickerel , Esox niger : correlations between feeding and locomotor behavior , 2022 .

[14]  Elke Blübaum-Gronau,et al.  The Lateral Line System of Surface-Feeding Fish: Anatomy, Physiology, and Behavior , 1989 .

[15]  Olav Sand,et al.  Selective and Reversible Blocking of the Lateral Line in Freshwater Fish , 1987 .

[16]  P. Webb,et al.  Strike tactics of Esox. , 1980, Canadian journal of zoology.

[17]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Use of the lateral line for feeding in the torrentfish (Cheimarrichthys fosteri) , 1993 .

[18]  R. Douglas,et al.  Size constancy in goldfish (Carassius auratus) , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  S. Coombs,et al.  Dipole source localization by mottled sculpin. III. Orientation after site-specific, unilateral denervation of the lateral line system , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  G. Lauder Prey Capture Hydrodynamics in Fishes: Experimental Tests of Two Models , 1983 .

[21]  P. Oshel,et al.  Use of the lateral line in particulate feeding in the dark by juvenile alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) , 1995 .

[22]  J. K. Liu,et al.  The role of sense organs in the feeding behaviour of Chinese perch , 1998 .

[23]  J. Montgomery Lateral Line Detection of Planktonic Prey , 1989 .

[24]  C. Hawryshyn,et al.  Behavioural studies of fish vision: an analysis of visual capabilities , 1990 .

[25]  D. Nyberg Prey Capture in the Largemouth Bass , 1971 .

[26]  J. L. Leeuwen,et al.  Prey capture hydrodynamics in fishes: two approaches , 1985 .

[27]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Neural Nets in Electric Fish , 1991 .

[28]  J. Bence,et al.  Prey Selection by Freshwater Predators with Different Foraging Strategies , 1985 .

[29]  E. Brainerd,et al.  CONVERGENCE IN THE FEEDING MECHANICS OF ECOMORPHOLOGICALLY SIMILAR SPECIES IN THE CENTRARCHIDAE AND CICHLIDAE , 1993 .