The impact of first metatarsophalangeal angle on the gait features measured by an in-shoe motion sensor

For proper walking, metatarsophalangeal joints play a crucial role during gait. In this study, we specify characteristic features observed in the foot motion signals measured by an in-shoe motion sensor that are significantly affected by the first metatarsophalangeal angle (FMTPA). To validate these specified features, we conduct a classification test for high and low FMTPA subjects by using them. Fifty subjects (23 males and 27 females) participated in our study, and their FMTPAs were measured by digital photography. The subjects with FMTPA above and below 20 degrees were categorized as the high and low groups, respectively, on the basis of the FMTPA distribution in all subjects. The perspective features that have a level of significance of p < 0.05 were specified by comparing the foot motion of the subjects in both groups. The two groups were classified by support vector machine learning. From the results, most significant differences are observed in the coronal plane during pre-swing. By applying the specified features as a predictor, 82.1% of strides are correctly classified in the leave-one-subject-out cross-validation test, which suggests the specified foot motion features intrinsically reflect the gait change induced by FMTPA.

[1]  D. Neumann Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system : foundations for physical rehabilitation , 2002 .

[2]  Tao Liu,et al.  Gait Analysis Using Wearable Sensors , 2012, Sensors.

[3]  M. Stephens,et al.  The pathogenesis of hallux valgus. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  M. Barnish,et al.  High-heeled shoes and musculoskeletal injuries: a narrative systematic review , 2016, BMJ Open.

[5]  Yaodong Gu,et al.  The effect of walking speed on the foot inter-segment kinematics, ground reaction forces and lower limb joint moments , 2018, PeerJ.

[6]  Simona Crea,et al.  Development of gait segmentation methods for wearable foot pressure sensors , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  I. Turan,et al.  Gait analysis in hallux valgus. , 1991, The Journal of foot surgery.

[8]  B. Vicenzino,et al.  Validity and reliability of hallux valgus angle measured on digital photographs. , 2012, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[9]  Frank Rattay,et al.  Mobile gait analysis via eSHOEs instrumented shoe insoles: a pilot study for validation against the gold standard GAITRite® , 2017, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[10]  Sebastian Madgwick,et al.  Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[11]  S. Yamaguchi,et al.  Nonradiographic Measurement of Hallux Valgus Angle Using Self‐photography , 2019, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[12]  R. Marks,et al.  Motion of the Multisegmental Foot in Hallux Valgus , 2010, Foot & ankle international.

[13]  M. Tada,et al.  Evaluation of plantar pressures in people with hallux valgus using principal component analysis. , 2018, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[14]  V. Vapnik Pattern recognition using generalized portrait method , 1963 .

[15]  K. Moerenhout,et al.  Characterization of gait in female patients with moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity. , 2015, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Weiya Zhang,et al.  Are hallux valgus and big toe pain associated with impaired quality of life? A cross-sectional study. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[17]  B. Vicenzino,et al.  Gait parameters associated with hallux valgus: a systematic review , 2013, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.