Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA): a novel method to quantify individual radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in detail.

OBJECTIVE Radiography is still the golden standard for imaging features of osteoarthritis (OA), such as joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and osteophyte formation. Objective assessment, however, remains difficult. The goal of the present study was to evaluate a novel digital method to analyse standard knee radiographs. METHODS Standardized radiographs of 20 healthy and 55 OA knees were taken in general practise according to the semi-flexed method by Buckland-Wright. Joint Space Width (JSW), osteophyte area, subchondral bone density, joint angle, and tibial eminence height were measured as continuous variables using newly developed Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA) software on a standard PC. Two observers evaluated the radiographs twice, each on two different occasions. The observers were blinded to the source of the radiographs and to their previous measurements. Statistical analysis to compare measurements within and between observers was performed according to Bland and Altman. Correlations between KIDA data and Kellgren & Lawrence (K&L) grade were calculated and data of healthy knees were compared to those of OA knees. RESULTS Intra- and inter-observer variations for measurement of JSW, subchondral bone density, osteophytes, tibial eminence, and joint angle were small. Significant correlations were found between KIDA parameters and K&L grade. Furthermore, significant differences were found between healthy and OA knees. CONCLUSION In addition to JSW measurement, objective evaluation of osteophyte formation and subchondral bone density is possible on standard radiographs. The measured differences between OA and healthy individuals suggest that KIDA allows detection of changes in time, although sensitivity to change has to be demonstrated in long-term follow-up studies.

[1]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Epidemiologic associations of pain in osteoarthritis of the knee: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the National Health and Nutrition Examination-I Epidemiologic Follow-up Survey. , 1989, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  Jean-Pierre Devogelaer,et al.  Recommendations for the use of new methods to assess the efficacy of disease-modifying drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  E. Vignon,et al.  Influence of the quality of tibial plateau alignment on the reproducibility of computer joint space measurement from Lyon schuss radiographic views of the knee in patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[4]  M Lequesne,et al.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[5]  E. Vignon,et al.  Radiographic assessment of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Recommendations: recommended guidelines. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  K. Brandt,et al.  Comparison of quantitative and semiquantitative indicators of joint space narrowing in subjects with knee osteoarthritis , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  N. Hadler.  Knee Pain Is the Malady—Not Osteoarthritis , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[9]  P. Garnero,et al.  Use of biochemical markers to study and follow patients with osteoarthritis , 2006, Current rheumatology reports.

[10]  E. Vignon,et al.  Advances in radiographic imaging of progression of hip and knee osteoarthritis. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  P. Costa,et al.  Association of radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the knee with knee pain: data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. , 1995, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[12]  P A Dieppe,et al.  The Bristol 'OA500' study: progression of osteoarthritis (OA) over 3 years and the relationship between clinical and radiographic changes at the knee joint. , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[13]  M. Dougados,et al.  Measurement of the radiological hip joint space width. An evaluation of various methods of measurement. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[14]  C Buckland-Wright,et al.  Current status of imaging procedures in the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of osteoarthritis. , 1997, Bailliere's clinical rheumatology.

[15]  I. Petersson,et al.  Joint space width of the tibiofemoral and of the patellofemoral joint in chronic knee pain with or without radiographic osteoarthritis: a 2-year follow-up. , 2003, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[16]  C. Hayne,et al.  Substantial superiority of semiflexed (MTP) views in knee osteoarthritis: a comparative radiographic study, without fluoroscopy, of standing extended, semiflexed (MTP), and schuss views. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  C. Webber.  Photon absorptiometry, bone densitometry and the challenge of osteoporosis , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  R. Bank,et al.  Molecular markers for osteoarthritis: the road ahead , 2002, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[19]  M A Viergever,et al.  Ankle images digital analysis (AIDA): digital measurement of joint space width and subchondral sclerosis on standard radiographs. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[20]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[21]  P. Croft,et al.  An introduction to the Atlas of Standard Radiographs of Arthritis. , 2005, Rheumatology.

[22]  P. Croft,et al.  Clinical classification criteria for knee osteoarthritis: performance in the general population and primary care , 2006, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[23]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Osteoarthritis: definitions and criteria. , 1989, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  C. Peterfy,et al.  Reproducibility of the semiflexed (metatarsophalangeal) radiographic knee position and automated measurements of medial tibiofemoral joint space width in a multicenter clinical trial of knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[25]  A. Poole.  Can serum biomarker assays measure the progression of cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis? , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[27]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  L. Sharma,et al.  Effects of doxycycline on progression of osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[29]  A. M. Doughan,et al.  Quantification of progressive joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis of the hip: longitudinal analysis of the contralateral hip after total hip arthroplasty. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[30]  S. Ahlback,et al.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. , 1968 .

[31]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  The Outcome of Nonoperated Patients with Chronic Lateral Instability of the Ankle: A 20-Year Follow-up Study , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[32]  Pybus Pk,et al.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. , 1980 .

[33]  J. Lynch,et al.  Quantitative microfocal radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis of the knee from weight bearing tunnel and semiflexed standing views. , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology.

[34]  T. Hangartner,et al.  X-ray technologists' reproducibility from automated measurements of the medial tibiofemoral joint space width in knee osteoarthritis for a multicenter, multinational clinical trial. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.