Microbleed Detection Using Automated Segmentation (MIDAS): A New Method Applicable to Standard Clinical MR Images

BACKGROUND Cerebral microbleeds, visible on gradient-recalled echo (GRE) T2* MRI, have generated increasing interest as an imaging marker of small vessel diseases, with relevance for intracerebral bleeding risk or brain dysfunction. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Manual rating methods have limited reliability and are time-consuming. We developed a new method for microbleed detection using automated segmentation (MIDAS) and compared it with a validated visual rating system. In thirty consecutive stroke service patients, standard GRE T2* images were acquired and manually rated for microbleeds by a trained observer. After spatially normalizing each patient's GRE T2* images into a standard stereotaxic space, the automated microbleed detection algorithm (MIDAS) identified cerebral microbleeds by explicitly incorporating an "extra" tissue class for abnormal voxels within a unified segmentation-normalization model. The agreement between manual and automated methods was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kappa statistic. We found that MIDAS had generally moderate to good agreement with the manual reference method for the presence of lobar microbleeds (Kappa = 0.43, improved to 0.65 after manual exclusion of obvious artefacts). Agreement for the number of microbleeds was very good for lobar regions: (ICC = 0.71, improved to ICC = 0.87). MIDAS successfully detected all patients with multiple (≥2) lobar microbleeds. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE MIDAS can identify microbleeds on standard MR datasets, and with an additional rapid editing step shows good agreement with a validated visual rating system. MIDAS may be useful in screening for multiple lobar microbleeds.

[1]  Steven Warach,et al.  Cerebral Microbleeds : A Field Guide to their Detection and Interpretation , 2012 .

[2]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[3]  D. Werring,et al.  Brain microbleeds as a potential risk factor for antiplatelet-related intracerebral haemorrhage: hospital-based, case–control study , 2010, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[4]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  MR Imaging Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds: Effect of Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging, Section Thickness, and Field Strength , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  D. Werring,et al.  The Microbleed Anatomical Rating Scale (MARS) , 2009, Neurology.

[6]  P. Vermersch,et al.  Parkinson's disease and basal ganglia calcifications: Prevalence and clinico-radiological correlations , 1992, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[7]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer agreement of brain MRI lesion volume measurements in multiple sclerosis. A comparison of techniques. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[9]  D. Werring,et al.  Cognitive dysfunction in patients with cerebral microbleeds on T2*-weighted gradient-echo MRI. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  H. Chabriat,et al.  Cerebral microhemorrhage. Commentary , 2006 .

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[13]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Spatial clustering of hemorrhages in probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[14]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Noureddine Doghmane,et al.  Brain MRI Segmentation and Lesions Detection by EM Algorithm , 2008 .

[16]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Comparative magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla for the evaluation of traumatic microbleeds. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[17]  H. Chabriat,et al.  Cerebral microhemorrhage. , 2006, Stroke.

[18]  A. Traboulsee,et al.  Semi-Automated Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions in Brain MRI using Texture Analysis , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology.

[19]  H. Leung,et al.  Risk vs benefit of anti-thrombotic therapy in ischaemic stroke patients with cerebral microbleeds , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[20]  Rebecca A Betensky,et al.  Microbleeds Versus Macrobleeds: Evidence for Distinct Entities , 2009, Stroke.

[21]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) , 2004, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[22]  Anil F. Ramlackhansingh,et al.  Lesion identification using unified segmentation-normalisation models and fuzzy clustering , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  S. Greenberg,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Validation of the Boston Criteria , 2003, Current atherosclerosis reports.

[24]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  Detection of asymptomatic cerebral microbleeds: a comparative study at 1.5 and 3.0 T. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[25]  A. Silman,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. , 1992, BMJ.