Novel Quantitative PET Techniques for Clinical Decision Support in Oncology.

Quantitative image analysis has deep roots in the usage of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical and research settings to address a wide variety of diseases. It has been extensively employed to assess molecular and physiological biomarkers in vivo in healthy and disease states, in oncology, cardiology, neurology, and psychiatry. Quantitative PET allows relating the time-varying activity concentration in tissues/organs of interest and the basic functional parameters governing the biological processes being studied. Yet, quantitative PET is challenged by a number of degrading physical factors related to the physics of PET imaging, the limitations of the instrumentation used, and the physiological status of the patient. Moreover, there is no consensus on the most reliable and robust image-derived PET metric(s) that can be used with confidence in clinical oncology owing to the discrepancies between the conclusions reported in the literature. There is also increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence based techniques, particularly machine learning and deep learning techniques in a variety of applications to extract quantitative features (radiomics) from PET including image segmentation and outcome prediction in clinical oncology. These novel techniques are revolutionizing clinical practice and are now offering unique capabilities to the clinical molecular imaging community and biomedical researchers at large. In this report, we summarize recent developments and future tendencies in quantitative PET imaging and present example applications in clinical decision support to illustrate its potential in the context of clinical oncology.

[1]  Ruijiang Li,et al.  Machine learning in radiation oncology : theory and applications , 2015 .

[2]  Piergiorgio Cerello,et al.  Online proton therapy monitoring: clinical test of a Silicon-photodetector-based in-beam PET , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[3]  A. Alavi,et al.  Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  Mark Lubberink,et al.  Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Abass Alavi,et al.  Feasibility and performance of novel software to quantify metabolically active volumes and 3D partial volume corrected SUV and metabolic volumetric products of spinal bone marrow metastases on 18F-FDG-PET/CT. , 2011, Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine.

[6]  A. Alavi,et al.  Standardized uptake values of FDG: body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  M E Casey,et al.  Continuous bed motion on clinical scanner: design, data correction, and reconstruction. , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Martin J. Murphy,et al.  Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology , 2015 .

[9]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Modeling in PET. , 2007, PET clinics.

[10]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[11]  Andre Dekker,et al.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  Abass Alavi,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the atherosclerotic burden of the aorta by combined FDG-PET and CT image analysis: a new concept. , 2006, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[13]  M. Conti Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  L. Pierce,et al.  A Digital Reference Object to Analyze Calculation Accuracy of PET Standardized Uptake Value. , 2015, Radiology.

[17]  S. Houshmand,et al.  Quantification of aging effects upon global knee inflammation by 18F-FDG-PET , 2015, Nuclear medicine communications.

[18]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Radiomics strategies for risk assessment of tumour failure in head-and-neck cancer , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Brief review of invariant texture analysis methods , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Quantitative assessment of tumor metabolism using FDG-PET imaging. , 2000, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[21]  J. Bradley,et al.  Combined PET/CT image characteristics for radiotherapy tumor response in lung cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  I. El Naqa,et al.  Beyond imaging: The promise of radiomics. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[23]  Y. Liu,et al.  Radiomic Features Are Associated With EGFR Mutation Status in Lung Adenocarcinomas. , 2016, Clinical lung cancer.

[24]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  Effect of Midtreatment PET/CT-Adapted Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[25]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Breast imaging with fluorine-18-FDG PET: quantitative image analysis. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  R L Wahl,et al.  Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. , 1993, Radiology.

[27]  Peter Smeets,et al.  Predictive and prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis in solid tumours , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  Chun-Ta Liao,et al.  Textural Features of Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT Images: Prognostic Significance in Patients with Advanced T-Stage Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  T. Werner,et al.  Clinical Utility of FDG–PET and PET/CT in Non-malignant Thoracic Disorders , 2011, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[30]  Jen-Tzung Chien,et al.  Deep reinforcement learning for automated radiation adaptation in lung cancer , 2017, Medical physics.

[31]  A. Alavi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of PET and MRI data in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease: atrophy weighted total brain metabolism and absolute whole brain metabolism as reliable discriminators. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[33]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Respiratory Motion Correction Strategies in Thoracic PET-CT Imaging. , 2013, PET clinics.

[34]  F O'Sullivan,et al.  Incorporation of tumor shape into an assessment of spatial heterogeneity for human sarcomas imaged with FDG-PET. , 2005, Biostatistics.

[35]  C. Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[36]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Classification and evaluation strategies of auto‐segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211 , 2017, Medical physics.

[37]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[38]  T. Werner,et al.  Detection and global quantification of cardiovascular molecular calcification by fluoro18-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography--a novel concept. , 2011, Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine.

[39]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Vision 20/20: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation correction in PET/MRI: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities. , 2016, Medical physics.

[40]  Bing Bai,et al.  Tumor Quantification in Clinical Positron Emission Tomography , 2013, Theranostics.

[41]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[42]  Klemens Scheidhauer,et al.  Investigating added value of freehand SPECT in sentinel node biopsy of melanomas , 2011 .

[43]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Novel quantitative techniques for assessing regional and global function and structure based on modern imaging modalities: implications for normal variation, aging and diseased states. , 2007, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[44]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative Analysis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[45]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  A. Salavati,et al.  FDG PET/CT in Crohn’s disease: correlation of quantitative FDG PET/CT parameters with clinical and endoscopic surrogate markers of disease activity , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[47]  A. Alavi,et al.  Quantification of atherosclerotic plaque activity and vascular inflammation using [18-F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[48]  R. Mak,et al.  Impact of experimental design on PET radiomics in predicting somatic mutation status. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[49]  R. Gillies,et al.  The biology underlying molecular imaging in oncology: from genome to anatome and back again. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[50]  J. Valliant A Bridge Not Too Far: Linking Disciplines Through Molecular Imaging Probes , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[51]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[52]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[53]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  The role of quantitative (18)F-FDG PET studies for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[54]  M. Hatt,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[55]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Defining a Radiomic Response Phenotype: A Pilot Study using targeted therapy in NSCLC , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[56]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Advances in PET Image Reconstruction. , 2007, PET clinics.

[57]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Direct parametric reconstruction for dynamic [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging in the body , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[58]  S. Houshmand,et al.  An update on novel quantitative techniques in the context of evolving whole-body PET imaging. , 2015, PET clinics.

[59]  Gary Kelloff,et al.  The Quantitative Imaging Network: NCI's Historical Perspective and Planned Goals. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[60]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  Radiomics in precision medicine for lung cancer. , 2017, Translational lung cancer research.

[61]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Correction of oral contrast artifacts in CT-based attenuation correction of PET images using an automated segmentation algorithm , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[62]  Anil K. Jain Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[63]  John L. Humm,et al.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[64]  Finbarr O'Sullivan,et al.  A statistical measure of tissue heterogeneity with application to 3D PET sarcoma data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[65]  R. Mach New Targets for the Development of PET Tracers for Imaging Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer Disease , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[66]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[67]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: Historical review, current status and future potential , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[68]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  A Guide to Outcome Modeling in Radiotherapy and Oncology: Listening to the Data , 2018 .

[69]  Jian Zhou,et al.  Efficient fully 3D list-mode TOF PET image reconstruction using a factorized system matrix with an image domain resolution model , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[70]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Metal artifact reduction strategies for improved attenuation correction in hybrid PET/CT imaging. , 2012, Medical physics.

[71]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Hybrid whole-body dynamic TOF PET imaging for simultaneous estimation of compartmental and patlak parametric maps from continuous bed motion data , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[72]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Whole-body direct 4D parametric PET imaging employing nested generalized Patlak expectation–maximization reconstruction , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[73]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[74]  Suleman Surti,et al.  A recovery coefficient method for partial volume correction of PET images , 2009, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[75]  G. Fakhri,et al.  Monitoring proton therapy with PET. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[76]  A. Alavi,et al.  Current Evidence Base of FDG-PET/CT Imaging in the Clinical Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Emerging Significance of Image Segmentation and Global Disease Assessment , 2011, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[77]  I. Naqa The role of quantitative PET in predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2014, Clinical and Translational Imaging.

[78]  Stephan G. Nekolla,et al.  Local motion correction for lung tumours in PET/CT—first results , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[79]  R. Boellaard Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[80]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology. , 2018, The British journal of radiology.

[81]  Andrew V. Sutherland,et al.  Molecular tracers for the PET and SPECT imaging of disease. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[82]  A. Alavi,et al.  Trends in PET quantification: opportunities and challenges , 2014, Clinical and Translational Imaging.

[83]  Jeffrey D Bradley,et al.  Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Textural Features in Locally Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[84]  W. Moses,et al.  Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[85]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy? , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[86]  Roger Fulton,et al.  A scheme for PET data normalization in event-based motion correction , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[87]  R. Frank,et al.  Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance FDG–PET/CT Working Group Report , 2008, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[88]  Chuong D. Hoang,et al.  Predictive radiogenomics modeling of EGFR mutation status in lung cancer , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[89]  Christian Barillot,et al.  The first MICCAI challenge on PET tumor segmentation , 2018, Medical Image Anal..

[90]  H. Aerts,et al.  Applications and limitations of radiomics , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[91]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Four-dimensional (4D) image reconstruction strategies in dynamic PET: beyond conventional independent frame reconstruction. , 2009, Medical physics.

[92]  Abass Alavi,et al.  Quantification in PET. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[93]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[94]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Patient-Specific Hybrid Whole-body PET Parametric Imaging From SpeedModulated Continuous Bed Motion Dynamic Data , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[95]  T. Werner,et al.  A novel method to assess subchondral bone formation using [18F]NaF-PET in the evaluation of knee degeneration , 2018, Nuclear medicine communications.

[96]  F. Cendes,et al.  Texture analysis of medical images. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[97]  Wei Lu,et al.  Toward a standard for the evaluation of PET‐Auto‐Segmentation methods following the recommendations of AAPM task group No. 211: Requirements and implementation , 2017, Medical physics.

[98]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Partial Volume Correction Strategies in PET. , 2007, PET clinics.

[99]  A. Alavi,et al.  Determination of whole-body metabolic burden as a quantitative measure of disease activity in lymphoma: a novel approach with fluorodeoxyglucose-PET , 2008, Nuclear medicine communications.

[100]  A. Reader,et al.  4D image reconstruction for emission tomography , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[101]  A. Salavati,et al.  Quantitative assessment of global lung inflammation following radiation therapy using FDG PET/CT: a pilot study , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.