Experimental and numerical evaluation of interfacial adhesion on Cu/SiN in LSI interconnect structures

Abstract The local interfacial strength is a key factor in designing and fabricating advanced three-dimensional large-scale integration interconnect structures. In this paper, both local fracture tests and three-dimensional elastic–plastic crack propagation analysis for a 10 μm × 10 μm specimen were performed, and the local interfacial adhesion between a Cu interconnect and a SiN cap layer were evaluated. The three-dimensional elastic–plastic crack propagation simulation was developed to evaluate the interfacial adhesion that eliminated the effect of progressive plastic dissipation energy during crack propagation. The results show that the average interfacial adhesion for Cu/SiN is 4.46 ± 0.17 J/m2. The crack propagation behavior and fracture pattern depend on the interfacial adhesion, and these differences are due to the plastic yielding of the side edge of the specimen. The critical interfacial adhesion for the onset of shear fracture is 4.92 J/m2, which is the upper bound of the interfacial adhesion evaluation for the 10 μm × 10 μm specimen.

[1]  A. Evans,et al.  A Test Specimen for Determining the Fracture Resistance of Bimaterial Interfaces , 1989 .

[2]  W. Gerberich,et al.  Continuous microscratch measurements of the practical and true works of adhesion for metal/ceramic systems , 1996 .

[3]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  Measurement of adherence of residually stressed thin films by indentation. I. Mechanics of interface delamination , 1984 .

[4]  Masaki Omiya,et al.  A comparative study of a new microscale technique and conventional bending techniques for evaluating the interface adhesion strength in IC metallization systems , 2010 .

[5]  Michael Lane,et al.  Relationship between interfacial adhesion and electromigration in Cu metallization , 2003 .

[6]  Masaki Omiya,et al.  Adhesion energy of Cu/polyimide interface in flexible printed circuits , 2007 .

[7]  Michael Lane,et al.  Adhesion and debonding of multi-layer thin film structures , 1998 .

[8]  S. Kwon,et al.  Adhesion studies of magnetron-sputtered copper films on nickel substrates: Effects of substrate surface pretreatments , 1990 .

[9]  Toru Ikeda,et al.  Stress intensity factor analysis of a three-dimensional interface crack between dissimilar anisotropic materials , 2007 .

[10]  N. J. Chou,et al.  Adhesion of titanium thin film to oxide substrates , 1987 .

[11]  L. Freund,et al.  Thin Film Materials: Stress, Defect Formation and Surface Evolution , 2004 .

[12]  Masumi Saka,et al.  A comparative study of the mechanical properties of PVD coatings evaluated by new techniques and conventional methods , 2004 .

[13]  Koh Yamanaga,et al.  Stress intensity factor analyses of interface cracks between dissimilar anisotropic materials using the finite element method , 2006 .

[14]  Masumi Saka,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of bonding energy for the interfaces in Cu metallization systems , 2006 .

[15]  Masaki Omiya,et al.  Evaluation of Interfacial Strength by Multi-Stages Peel Test , 2004 .

[16]  Masaki Omiya,et al.  A novel evaluation method for interfacial adhesion strength in ductile dissimilar materials , 2008 .

[17]  Zhenjiang Cui,et al.  Benchmarking Four Point Bend Adhesion Testing: The Effect of Test Parameters On Adhesion Energy , 2005 .

[18]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Plasticity contributions to interface adhesion in thin-film interconnect structures , 2000 .

[19]  Nikolaos Aravas,et al.  Elastoplastic analysis of the peel test , 1988 .

[20]  Masumi Saka,et al.  A comparative study of the mechanical strength of chemical vapor-deposited diamond and physical vapor-deposited hard coatings , 2005 .

[21]  Butrus T. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Measurements of adherence of residually stressed thin films by indentation. II. Experiments with ZnO/Si , 1984 .