Tamm review: Tree interactions between myth and reality
暂无分享,去创建一个
Arne Pommerening | Andrew J. Sánchez Meador | A. Pommerening | A. S. Meador | A. S. Sánchez Meador | Andrew J. Sánchez Meador
[1] Matthias Dobbertin,et al. A Comparison of Distance-Dependent Competition Measures for Height and Basal Area Growth of Individual Conifer Trees , 1992, Forest Science.
[2] J. P. Grime,et al. An Experimental Test of Plant Strategy Theory , 1992 .
[3] D. Stoyan,et al. Model-based analysis of the influence of ecological processes on forest point pattern formation—A case study , 2011 .
[4] J. Jarvis,et al. A Preliminary Study to Assess Competition in a White Spruce - Trembling Aspen Stand , 1963 .
[5] Fabio Bulleri,et al. Facilitation and the niche: implications for coexistence, range shifts and ecosystem functioning , 2016 .
[6] Christopher J. Lortie,et al. Refining the stress‐gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities , 2009 .
[7] K. Umeki,et al. Effect of Canopy Structure on Degree of Asymmetry of Competition in Two Forest Stands in Northern Japan , 1996 .
[8] Manuel Abellanas,et al. A forest simulation approach using weighted Voronoi diagrams. An application to Mediterranean fir Abies pinsapo Boiss stands , 2016 .
[9] William R. Wykoff,et al. A Basal Area Increment Model for Individual Conifers in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 1990, Forest Science.
[10] Jacob Weiner,et al. The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations , 1984, Oecologia.
[11] H. Lichtenthaler,et al. The Stress Concept in Plants: An Introduction , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[12] J. Vanclay,et al. Spatially explicit competition in a mixed planting of Araucaria cunninghamii and Flindersia brayleyana , 2013, Annals of Forest Science.
[13] Tal Seifan,et al. Symmetry and range limits in importance indices , 2015, Ecology and evolution.
[14] M. Fortin,et al. Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists 1st edition , 2005 .
[15] D. Murrell,et al. Testing Spatial Theories of Plant Coexistence: No Consistent Differences in Intra‐ and Interspecific Interaction Distances , 2009, The American Naturalist.
[16] C. Mattheck. Trees: The Mechanical Design , 1991 .
[17] H. Morowitz,et al. Energy Flow in Biology , 1969 .
[18] Density dependence across multiple life stages in a temperate old-growth forest of northeast China , 2012, Oecologia.
[19] Hsin-I Wu,et al. Ecological field theory: A spatial analysis of resource interference among plants , 1985 .
[20] B. Gardiner,et al. The effect of wind exposure on the tree aerial architecture and biomechanics of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis, Pinaceae). , 2006, American journal of botany.
[21] A. Pommerening,et al. Differences between competition kernels and traditional size-ratio based competition indices used in forest ecology , 2014 .
[22] Xinna Zhang,et al. Effects of density dependence in a temperate forest in northeastern China , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[23] Jacob Weiner,et al. Symmetry of below-ground competition between Kochia scoparia individuals , 1997 .
[24] F R Adler,et al. A model of self-thinning through local competition. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] Alexia Stokes,et al. Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. , 2006, American journal of botany.
[26] R. Monserud,et al. A basal area increment model for individual trees growing in even- and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria , 1996 .
[27] Christian Messier,et al. Use of a spatially explicit individual-tree model (SORTIE/BC) to explore the implications of patchiness in structurally complex forests , 2003 .
[28] M. Westoby,et al. Plant height and evolutionary games , 2003 .
[29] Q. V. Cao,et al. A Simple Stand Growth Model Based on Canopy Dynamics and Biomechanics , 2013 .
[30] T. Spies,et al. An Individual-Based Process Model to Simulate Landscape-Scale Forest Ecosystem Dynamics , 2012 .
[31] J. Cahill. Fertilization effects on interactions between above-and belowground competition in an old field , 1999 .
[32] J. A. Neldee. New Kinds of Systematic Designs for Spacing Experiments , 1962 .
[33] Hans Pretzsch,et al. Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield: From Measurement to Model , 2009 .
[34] W. E. Snyder,et al. Niche Partitioning Increases Resource Exploitation by Diverse Communities , 2008, Science.
[35] A. Brunner. A light model for spatially explicit forest stand models , 1996 .
[36] Jonathan M. Chase,et al. Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2003 .
[37] D. Coomes,et al. Competitive interactions between forest trees are driven by species' trait hierarchy, not phylogenetic or functional similarity: implications for forest community assembly. , 2012, Ecology letters.
[38] R. Law,et al. Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors , 2002 .
[39] Joseph S. Wright. Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence , 2017, Oecologia.
[40] Noelle G. Beckman,et al. Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence for distance- and density-dependent seed and seedling survival , 2014, The Journal of ecology.
[41] R. Freckleton,et al. Measuring plant neighbour effects. Authors' reply , 1997 .
[42] J. Roy,et al. Dynamic niche partitioning in root water uptake facilitates efficient water use in more diverse grassland plant communities , 2018 .
[43] A. R. Ek,et al. A Comparison of Competition Measures and Growth Models for Predicting Plantation Red Pine Diameter and Height Growth , 1984 .
[44] P. Keddy,et al. Measuring Diffuse Competition Along an Environmental Gradient: Results from a Shoreline Plant Community , 1986, The American Naturalist.
[45] Harold E. Burkhart,et al. Modeling Forest Trees and Stands , 2012, Springer Netherlands.
[46] J. Weiner,et al. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[47] G. F. Gause. The struggle for existence , 1971 .
[48] Lars Lundqvist,et al. Influence of biomechanics and growing space on tree growth in young Pinus sylvestris stands. , 2010 .
[49] Hubert Hasenauer,et al. Dimensional relationships of open-grown trees in Austria , 1997 .
[50] H. Pretzsch,et al. Tree species mixing can increase maximum stand density , 2016 .
[51] R. Freckleton,et al. Constant Final Yield , 2010 .
[52] F. Houllier,et al. Ecological meaning and predictive ability of social status, vigour and competition indices in a tropical rain forest (India) , 1999 .
[53] R. Freckleton,et al. Asymmetric competition between plant species , 2001 .
[54] A. Pommerening,et al. Relative plant growth revisited: Towards a mathematical standardisation of separate approaches , 2016 .
[55] Manuel K. Schneider,et al. Quantification of neighbourhood‐dependent plant growth by Bayesian hierarchical modelling , 2006 .
[56] F. Pugnaire,et al. MEASURING PLANT INTERACTIONS: A NEW COMPARATIVE INDEX , 2004 .
[57] P. Urwin,et al. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.
[58] A. Pommerening,et al. A review of the history, definitions and methods of continuous cover forestry with special attention to afforestation and restocking , 2004 .
[59] Jacob Weiner,et al. How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations , 1986 .
[60] Francis K. C. Hui,et al. Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition , 2015, Nature.
[61] P. Jolliffe,et al. Indices of plant competition , 2003 .
[62] Satoshi N. Suzuki,et al. Development of a local size hierarchy causes regular spacing of trees in an even-aged Abies forest: analyses using spatial autocorrelation and the mark correlation function. , 2008, Annals of botany.
[63] S. Hubbell,et al. Strong density- and diversity-related effects help to maintain tree species diversity in a neotropical forest. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[64] R. Macarthur. PATTERNS OF SPECIES DIVERSITY , 1965 .
[65] H. Muller‐Landau,et al. The Effects of Density, Spatial Pattern, and Competitive Symmetry on Size Variation in Simulated Plant Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[66] Wenzhen Liu,et al. A novel approach for assessing the neighborhood competition in two different aged forests , 2018, Forest Ecology and Management.
[67] Harold E. Burkhart,et al. Distance-Dependent Competition Measures for Predicting Growth of Individual Trees , 1989 .
[68] J. HilleRisLambers,et al. Competition and facilitation may lead to asymmetric range shift dynamics with climate change , 2017, Global change biology.
[69] Uta Berger,et al. Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.
[70] K. Tielbörger,et al. Facilitating an importance index , 2010 .
[71] M. Loreau,et al. Biodiversity effects and transgressive overyielding , 2008 .
[72] Jessica Gurevitch,et al. THE META‐ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY , 1999 .
[73] Hans Pretzsch,et al. The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA: construction, application and evaluation , 2002 .
[74] P. Hessburg,et al. Restoring forest resilience: From reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring , 2013 .
[75] J. Lepš,et al. Do biodiversity indices behave as expected from traits of constituent species in simulated scenarios , 2011 .
[76] Arne Pommerening,et al. Do large forest trees tend towards high species mingling? , 2017, Ecol. Informatics.
[77] Eric Renshaw,et al. The analysis of marked point patterns evolving through space and time , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[78] Jacob Weiner,et al. Size Hierarchies in Experimental Populations of Annual Plants , 1985 .
[79] V. Grimm. Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? , 1999 .
[80] J. Weiner,et al. Competitive effect is a linear function of neighbour biomass in experimental populations of Kochia scoparia , 2006 .
[81] Liesje Mommer,et al. Molecular mechanisms of plant competition: neighbour detection and response strategies , 2013 .
[82] Hanns-Christof Spatz,et al. Basic biomechanics of self-supporting plants: wind loads and gravitational loads on a Norway spruce tree , 2000 .
[83] J. P. Grime,et al. Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.
[84] A. Ares,et al. Early responses to thinning treatments designed to accelerate late successional forest structure in young coniferous stands of western Oregon, USA , 2012 .
[85] O. Iribarne,et al. Beyond competition: the stress-gradient hypothesis tested in plant-herbivore interactions. , 2009, Ecology.
[86] M. Rietkerk,et al. A new family of standardized and symmetric indices for measuring the intensity and importance of plant neighbour effects , 2017 .
[87] H. Lichtenthaler. Vegetation stress : an introduction to the stress concept in plants , 1996 .
[88] D. Sumpter,et al. The role of competition and clustering in population dynamics , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[89] U. Berger,et al. The importance of conspecific facilitation during recruitment and regeneration: A case study in degraded mangroves , 2014 .
[90] I. Bella,et al. A New Competition Model for Individual Trees , 1971 .
[91] Mustapha Tlidi,et al. Self-Replication of Localized Vegetation Patches in Scarce Environments , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[92] Yuanfa Li,et al. Spatial structure of timber harvested according to structure-based forest management , 2014 .
[93] Robert Haining,et al. Spatial data analysis , 2003 .
[94] J. Connell. The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .
[95] A. Larson,et al. Tree spatial patterns in fire-frequent forests of western North America, including mechanisms of pattern formation and implications for designing fuel reduction and restoration treatments , 2012 .
[96] H. Pretzsch,et al. A Re-Evaluation of Reineke's Rule and Stand Density Index , 2005, Forest Science.
[97] Jacob Weiner,et al. Neighbourhood interference amongst Pinus rigida individuals , 1984 .
[98] G. Marion,et al. Understanding plantation transformation using a size-structured spatial population model , 2011 .
[99] H. Pretzsch. Species-specific allometric scaling under self-thinning: evidence from long-term plots in forest stands , 2005, Oecologia.
[100] S. Boyden,et al. COMPETITION AND FACILITATION BETWEEN EUCALYPTUS AND NITROGEN-FIXING FALCATARIA IN RELATION TO SOIL FERTILITY , 2005 .
[101] Thomas W. Schoener,et al. Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities , 1974, Science.
[102] Jerome K. Vanclay,et al. Forest Growth and Yield Modeling , 2011 .
[103] D. Janzen. Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests , 1970, The American Naturalist.
[104] Timo Pukkala,et al. Application of ecological field theory in distance-dependent growth modelling , 2002 .
[105] D. Binkley,et al. Are long-term changes in plant species composition related to asymmetric growth dominance in the pristine Białowieża Forest? , 2016 .
[106] M. Bertness,et al. Positive interactions in communities. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[107] E. D. Ford,et al. Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures , 1975 .
[108] D. Stoyan,et al. Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns , 2008 .
[109] H. Sterba,et al. Do competition-density rule and self-thinning rule agree? , 2014, Annals of Forest Science.
[110] Philip J. Burton,et al. Some limitations inherent to static indices of plant competition , 1993 .
[111] Thorsten Wiegand,et al. Handbook of Spatial Point-Pattern Analysis in Ecology , 2013 .
[112] D. Tilman. Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.
[113] S. Roberts,et al. Individual tree growth response to variable-density thinning in coastal Pacific Northwest forests. , 2008 .
[114] K. Rennolls,et al. Timber Management-A Quantitative Approach. , 1984 .
[115] K. Yoda,et al. Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions (Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI) , 1963 .
[116] C. Darwin. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .
[117] Jerome K. Vanclay,et al. Forest site productivity: a review of the evolution of dendrometric concepts for even-aged stands , 2008 .
[118] Uta Berger,et al. Differences between symmetric and asymmetric facilitation matter: exploring the interplay between modes of positive and negative plant interactions , 2012 .
[119] M. G. Ryan,et al. Patterns of growth dominance in forests of the Rocky Mountains, USA , 2006 .
[120] V. Grimm,et al. Plant Interactions Alter the Predictions of Metabolic Scaling Theory , 2013, PloS one.
[121] C. Damgaard. Measuring competition in plant communities where it is difficult to distinguish individual plants , 2011 .
[122] Steven F. Railsback,et al. Individual-based modeling and ecology , 2005 .
[123] Uta Berger,et al. TOWARDS A STANDARD FOR THE INDIVIDUAL‐BASED MODELING OF PLANT POPULATIONS: SELF‐THINNING AND THE FIELD‐OF‐NEIGHBORHOOD APPROACH , 2002 .
[124] H. Sterba,et al. The relationship between available area efficiency and area exploitation index in an even-aged coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) stand , 2012 .