Involving the patient: A prospective study on use, appreciation and effectiveness of an information system in head and neck cancer care

OBJECTIVE To determine use, appreciation and effectiveness of an electronic health information support system in head and neck (H&N) cancer care. DESIGN A prospective evaluation study. The evaluated system has four different functions: (1) communication amongst health care providers and between health care providers and patients, (2) information for health care providers and patients, (3) contact with fellow sufferers and (4) monitoring of discharged patients by means of electronic questionnaires. Evaluation of the system was done both objectively using automatically created log files and stored messages, and subjectively by using paper questionnaires from patients and general practitioners (GPs). SETTING Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery of a tertiary health care centre in the Netherlands. The system was put at patients' disposal for a period of 6 weeks following discharge from the hospital after surgery for H&N cancer, and was additional to standard care. PARTICIPANTS Head and neck cancer patients, hospital physicians, members of a hospital-based support team, GPs, district nurses and speech therapists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Actual use of the system by patients and health care providers. Patients' appreciation for each of the system's four different functions. GPs' appreciation for the system. Capability to detect potential patient problems with the system. RESULTS The system was used by 36 H&N cancer patients, 10 hospital physicians, 2 members of the support team, 8 GPs, 2 district nurses and 2 speech therapists. The total number of patient-sessions was 982: an average of 27.3 sessions per patient during the 6 weeks study period. In total, 456 monitoring questionnaires were completed. The support team in hospital responded with 231 actions. In 16 cases, an extra appointment was made for a patient with the hospital physician. Out of these cases, immediate action was considered necessary eight times. Patients appreciated the system highly, rating it with an average score of 8.0 on a 10-point scale. All patients used the monitoring function, and rated 'monitoring' with a mean score of 8.0 on a 10-point scale. Least used and appreciated was the 'contact with fellow sufferers' function. Only 8 out of possible 36 GPs used the system, rating it with an average of 5.6 on a 10-point scale. CONCLUSIONS The electronic health information support system was used intensively and highly appreciated by H&N cancer patients. The system enabled the early detection of occurring health problems that required direct intervention. ICT can play an additional role in the management of patients, also in a relatively elderly and computer illiterate patient population.

[1]  M D Hagen,et al.  The utility of electronic mail as a medium for patient-physician communication. , 1994, Archives of family medicine.

[2]  Chen-Tan Lin,et al.  Review Paper: The Effects of Promoting Patient Access to Medical Records: A Review , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  van den Borne Hw,et al.  Effects of contact between cancer patients on their psychosocial problems. , 1992 .

[4]  Arie Hasman,et al.  A consumer health record for supporting the patient-centered management of chronic diseases , 2003, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[5]  D H Gustafson,et al.  CHESS (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System): an interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an underserved population. , 1995, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[6]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Application of Information Technology: Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: Technical Implementation , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Jan Norum,et al.  Information and communication technology (ICT) in oncology. Patients' and relatives' experiences and suggestions , 2003, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[8]  J. Pruyn,et al.  Coping with stress in cancer patients. , 1983, Patient education and counseling.

[9]  W R Hersh,et al.  Telemedicine for the Medicare population. , 2001, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[10]  E van der Does,et al.  Continuity of information in cancer care: evaluation of a logbook. , 1997, Patient education and counseling.

[11]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics , 1997, Computers and Medicine.

[12]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  CHESS: An interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an underserved population , 1994, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[13]  J H van Bemmel,et al.  The Introduction of Computer-based Patient Records in the Netherlands , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  J. Fernsler,et al.  Evaluation of a computer-based cancer support network. , 1997, Cancer practice.

[15]  Randolph A. Miller,et al.  Reference Standards in Evaluating System Performance , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  William R. Hersh,et al.  Telemedicine for the Medicare Population: Summary , 2001 .

[17]  J. Hampson,et al.  Shared care: a review of the literature. , 1996, Family practice.

[18]  J. Pruyn,et al.  Effects of contact between cancer patients on their psychosocial problems. , 1987, WHO regional publications. European series.

[19]  Jan H. van Bemmel,et al.  An information system to support the care for head and neck cancer patients , 2003, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[20]  J H van Bemmel,et al.  Electronic communication between providers of primary and secondary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[21]  R M Rippey,et al.  A computerized cancer information system. , 1992, Patient education and counseling.

[22]  U. Shaikh,et al.  Electronic Communication With Patients for Breastfeeding Support , 2007, Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association.

[23]  P. Whitten,et al.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  P. Klemm,et al.  A nontraditional cancer support group. The Internet. , 1998, Computers in nursing.

[25]  Joyce A. Mitchell,et al.  Electronic Communication With Patients: Evaluation of Distance Medicine Technology , 1997 .

[26]  J P Alexander,et al.  Measuring the Continuity and Coordination of Medical Care in a System Involving Multiple Providers , 1984, Medical care.

[27]  Johan van der Lei,et al.  Electronic Messaging Between Primary and Secondary Care , 2001 .

[28]  J. C. Cherry,et al.  Diabetes disease management program for an indigent population empowered by telemedicine technology. , 2002, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.